Reverse phase experiment

For a mixture of biphenyl, benzoic acid, and benzyl alcohol, predict the order of elution and describe any differences that you would expect for a normal-phase HPLC experiment (in hexane solvent) compared with a reversed-phase experiment (in tetrahydrofuran-water solvent). 

The understanding of retention and selectivity behaviour in reversed-phase HPLC in order to control and predict chromatographic properties ai e interesting for both academic scientists and manufacturers. A number of retention and selectivity models are the subject of ongoing debate. The theoretical understanding of retention and selectivity, however, still lags behind the practical application of RP HPLC. In fact, many users of RP HPLC techniques very often select stationary phases and other experimental conditions by experience and intuition rather than by objective criteria. 

Alhedai et al also examined the exclusion properties of a reversed phase material The stationary phase chosen was a Cg hydrocarbon bonded to the silica, and the mobile phase chosen was 2-octane. As the solutes, solvent and stationary phase were all dispersive (hydrophobic in character) and both the stationary phase and the mobile phase contained Cg interacting moieties, the solute would experience the same interactions in both phases. Thus, any differential retention would be solely due to exclusion and not due to molecular interactions. This could be confirmed by carrying out the experiments at two different temperatures. If any interactive mechanism was present that caused retention, then different retention volumes would be obtained for the same solute at different temperatures. Solutes ranging from n-hexane to n hexatriacontane were chromatographed at 30°C and 50°C respectively. The results obtained are shown in Figure 8. 

A six-port valve was first used to interface the SEC microcolumn to the CZE capillary in a valve-loop design. UV-VIS detection was employed in this experiment. The overall run time was 2 h, with the CZE runs requiring 9 min. As in the reverse phase HPLC-CZE technique, runs were overlapped in the second dimension to reduce the apparent run time. The main disadvantage of this yu-SEC-CZE method was the valve that was used for interfacing. The six-port valve contributed a substantial extracolumn volume, and required a fixed volume of 900 nL of effluent from the chromatographic column for each CZE run. The large fixed volume imposed restrictions on the operating conditions of both of the separation methods. Specifically, to fill the 900 nL volume, the SEC flow rate had to be far above the optimum level and therefore the SEC efficiency was decreased (22). 

Recently, Janjic et al. published some papers [33-36] on the influence of the stationary and mobile phase composition on the solvent strength parameter e° and SP, the system parameter (SP = log xjx, where and denote the mole fractions of the modiher in the stationary and the mobile phase, respectively) in normal phase and reversed-phase column chromatography. They established a linear dependence between SP and the Snyder s solvent strength parameters e° by performing experiments with binary solvent mixtures on silica and alumina layers. 

Zarzycki and coworkers [77] studied the influence of temperature on the separation of cholesterol and bile acids using reversed-phase stationary phases. The best chromatographic conditions for the separation of mnlticomponent samples of steroids were chosen. Experiments were performed on wettable plates with RP-18W and at the temperatnres of 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60°C. The studies showed (Figure 9.9) that the degree of separation in the high-temperature region can be increased by an improvement of the efficiency of the chromatographic system. However, a relatively weak retention-temperatnre response for the studied steroids was observed. 

The method for chloroacetanilide soil metabolites in water determines concentrations of ethanesulfonic acid (ESA) and oxanilic acid (OXA) metabolites of alachlor, acetochlor, and metolachlor in surface water and groundwater samples by direct aqueous injection LC/MS/MS. After injection, compounds are separated by reversed-phase HPLC and introduced into the mass spectrometer with a TurboIonSpray atmospheric pressure ionization (API) interface. Using direct aqueous injection without prior SPE and/or concentration minimizes losses and greatly simplifies the analytical procedure. Standard addition experiments can be used to check for matrix effects. With multiple-reaction monitoring in the negative electrospray ionization mode, LC/MS/MS provides superior specificity and sensitivity compared with conventional liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) or liquid chromatography/ultraviolet detection (LC/UV), and the need for a confirmatory method is eliminated. In summary,... 

The PRISMA model was developed by Nyiredy for solvent optimization in TLC and HPLC [142,168-171]. The PRISMA model consists of three parts the selection of the chromatographic system, optimization of the selected mobile phases, and the selection of the development method. Since silica is the most widely used stationary phase in TLC, the optimization procedure always starts with this phase, although the method is equally applicable to all chemically bonded phases in the normal or reversed-phase mode. For the selection of suitable solvents the first experiments are carried out on TLC plates in unsaturated... 

The experiments below use reverse phase chromatography with bonded silica columns and uv absorbance detection. If more extensive experimental facilities are available, some additional experiments are suggested. These are concerned with the preparation and evaluation of columns, and with the use of other detectors and modes of hplc. It should be possible to complete each experiment within a three hour practical period. 

To separate homogeneous compounds from co-eluting metabolites, repeated HPLC experiments with changes in column and solvent systems were necessary. For example, kalihinol-A (107) sharing similar retention times with kalihinol-C (114), and kalihinol-F (112) with kalihinol-E (108), were resolved successfully on an ODS reverse phase column. Crystallization experiments were repeatedly undertaken. The sample of kalihinol-F (112) prepared for X-ray analysis had two C22H33N3O2 molecules in its asymmetric unit. 

An unusual series of nonterpenoid aliphatic isothiocyanates from a Fijian Pseudaxinyssa sp. was evident by their strong IR absorption [68]. After silica gel and reverse-phase HPLC experiments, the structures of (Z,Z)-1,18-diisothiocyanooctadeca-1,17-diene (134, n = 14), mp 15°C, and seven other di-olefinic a,mono-olefinic a, o>bisisothiocyanates (135, n = 9-18) and three a-isothiocyano-co-formyl mono-olefins (136, n = 9, 15, 16) were also identified by spectral data... 

Takayama and coworkers (60) introduced the h.p.l.c. separation technique for such amphiphilic molecules as lipid A, and in earlier experiments they applied paired-ion reverse-phase h.p.l.c. for the preparation of homogeneous fractions deriving from 4,-monophosphated lipid A of S. typhimur-ium. The purified preparations obtained were suitable for f.a.b. - m.s. analysis. However, monophosphated lipid A isolated in this way expressed a considerable heterogeneity with respect to the number and location of 0-acyl residues (60). In order to further improve the purification procedure, as well as to obtain lipid A derivatives suitable for n.m.r. spectroscopy, Qureshi et al. (174) prepared the dimethyl phosphate derivative of S. minnesota (R595) lipid A, which, after purification by reverse-phase h.p.l.c. (C18), could be analyzed by1 H-n.m.r. The n.m.r. spectrum of, for example, the heptaacyl lipid A dimethyl monophosphate fraction, unequivocally revealed 0-acyl substitution [14 0(3-OH)J at position 3 and a free hydroxyl group at position 4 of GlcN(I). 

In this experiment, a mixture of methyl, propyl, and butyl paraben (structures shown in Figure 13.14) in methanol solvent will be separated by reverse phase HPLC. Mobile phase compositions of varying polarities will first be tested to see which one gives the optimum resolution of this mixture, and following this, a standard curve for methyl paraben will be constructed and its concentration in this solution determined. 

---