Restriction Directive

Note that potential control profile discontinuities are allowed at each element location with error restrictions directly enforced for each element. For a sufficient number of elements (which can be determined by the algorithm in the previous section), the element can be as large as allowed by an active error constraint, or it can act as a degree of freedom for the control profile discontinuity, with its corresponding error constraint inactive. Otherwise, (35) is based on the implicit Runge-Kutta (IRK) or collocation... 

Current evidence suggests dietary restriction should begin as soon as possible, preferably within the first week of life (NIH Consensus Statement Online, 2000), but certainly within the first 20 days after birth (Poustie and Rutherford, 2004). There is considerable evidence that earlier initiation of dietary restriction directly corresponds to higher IQ levels, and elevated PA levels even in the first 2 weeks of life may affect development of the visual system (NIH Consensus Statement Online, 2000). 

In cases where data is considered to be more reliable and conclusive, such as on tin-organic compounds, SCHER has reached conclusions that have entailed a clearer green or red light for the Commission, which has usually followed suit (External expert 2009 DG Sanco 2009). The DG Sanco interviewees also maintained that SCHER s opinions had a significant impact on, e.g., the Commission s application of the so-called restriction directive . Thus, the better the data, the more influential the opinions of scientific committees such as SCHER. 

The computations for h > 12 became feasible by an exploitation of a code named DAST (dualist angle-restricted directional information) [31,48], It is no doubt that the Diisseldorf-Zagreb group has regained the hegemony in benzenoid enumerations. 

Methodological differences between the pre- and postintervention surveys restrict direct comparisons and should be considered when interpreting the results. Difference in samphng procedures, participant response rates, and issues arising from the collection of first morning void in the preintervention surveys versus casual spot morning samples in the post-intervention surveys have been discussed in detail in an earfier publication (Seal et ai, 2007). 

Irrespective of their classification, the following listed substances have to labeled in accordance with annex V part B of Directive 1999/45/EC [4-3] and of Restriction Directive 76/769/EEC [4-5] with the inscriptions mentioned. 

Council Directive 76/769/EEC [4-5], known as the Restriction Directive, was first published on 27 July 1976 and has so far been amended 28 times. The last amendments were 2005/59/EC and 2005/69/EC. 

Table 4.5 Regulated substances covered by annex I of the Restriction Directive.

AEA-EIA Joint Principles on Proposed European Waste and Substance Restrictions Directives, Nov. 2000. 

---