Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Restricted Reaction Matrices

Theorem 12. (a) There is no non-trivial restricted reaction matrix for... [Pg.55]

Remark. Suppose R is a restricted reaction matrix. Then R has three represen-... [Pg.61]

Even more important, however, is that if a restricted reaction matrix is decomposed according to the basis L(ij), K i), then it may happen that, although i fits B, none of the L(if), K(i), or any linear combination omitting one of the terms, fits B. For consider in R[S) the matrix. [Pg.61]

The R-matrices that can act on a reactant matrix B must contain negative integers r-jj such that r-jj < by. The negative entries in R represent the bonds broken in the reactant set represented by B. We can restrict reactions by specifying which bonds must be broken in any reaction. We can also augment the reactant set by a specified species such as hydrogen or chlorine, etc. These two above requirements are specified by a 1 reaction block.1 There are 9 reaction blocks currently in the system. [Pg.196]

Hence any diagonal entry for an atom in a BE matrix will be the free pair of electrons the atom possesses. Thus, the diagonal entry for Nitrogen could be 2 whereas for Hydrogen, Chlorine and Carbon, etc. it is zero. As a consequence, a reaction matrix in restricted chemistry will have all diagonal entries zero and each row sum equal to zero. Dugundji and Ugi (24) came to the following conclusions about R-matrices in restricted chemistry. [Pg.198]

Mass transfer limitations can be relevant in heterogeneous biocatalysis. If the enzyme is immobilized in the surface or inside a solid matrix, external (EDR) or internal (IDR) diffusional restrictions may be significant and have to be considered for proper bioreactor design. As shown in Fig. 3.1, this effect can be conveniently incorporated into the model that describes enzyme reactor operation in terms of the effectiveness factor, defined as the ratio between the effective (or observed) and inherent (in the absence of diffusional restrictions) reaction rates. Expressions for the effectiveness factor (rj), in the case of EDR, and the global effectiveness factor (t ) for different particle geometries, in the case of IDR, were developed in sections 4.4.1 and 4.4.2 (see Eqs. 4.39-4.42,4.53,4.54,4.71 and 4.72). Such functions can be generically written as ... [Pg.223]

Here (, ) is an initial (final) state momentum p = E, s, - m where s, and m, are the spin of ith particle and its projection and t is a reaction matrix. In other words, 7 invariance leads to no restrictions on the reaction amplitude, but to a relation between amplitudes for different processes. [Pg.79]

A completely difierent approach to scattering involves writing down an expression that can be used to obtain S directly from the wavefunction, and which is stationary with respect to small errors in die waveftmction. In this case one can obtain the scattering matrix element by variational theory. A recent review of this topic has been given by Miller [32]. There are many different expressions that give S as a ftmctional of the wavefunction and, therefore, there are many different variational theories. This section describes the Kohn variational theory, which has proven particularly useftil in many applications in chemical reaction dynamics. To keep the derivation as simple as possible, we restrict our consideration to potentials of die type plotted in figure A3.11.1(c) where the waveftmcfton vanishes in the limit of v -oo, and where the Smatrix is a scalar property so we can drop the matrix notation. [Pg.968]

Note that the sums are restricted to the portion of the frill S matrix that describes reaction (or the specific reactive process that is of interest). It is clear from this definition that the CRP is a highly averaged property where there is no infomiation about individual quantum states, so it is of interest to develop methods that detemiine this probability directly from the Scln-ddinger equation rather than indirectly from the scattering matrix. In this section we first show how the CRP is related to the physically measurable rate constant, and then we discuss some rigorous and approximate methods for directly detennining the CRP. Much of this discussion is adapted from Miller and coworkers [44, 45]. [Pg.990]

The induction period observed at the very beginning of the irradiation is due to the well known inhibition effect of oxygen on these radical-induced reactions. Once it is over, after the, v10 ms needed to consume essentially all of the oxygen dissolved in the liquid film (19), the polymerization starts rapidly to reach 75 % conversion within 0.08 s. Further UV exposure leads only to a slow increase in the cure, mainly because of mobility restrictions in the rigid matrix, so that there still remains about 15 % of acrylic unsaturation in coatings heavily irradiated for 0.4 s. [Pg.213]

In the early 1960s it became evident that the reaction environment had an important role in dictating the course of photochemical conversions acting on the course of the relaxation processes and stabilizing photoproducts.17 A constrained medium such as that of a porous matrix or a micelle provides the restricted environment to stop any bimolecular processes that could lead to degradation of products. These effects, however, are subtle. For instance, confinement of a molecule within a host instead of leading to inhibition of reactions of the trapped substrate often results in enhanced reactivity and selectivity because confinement does not mean steric inhibition of all motions of the entrapped host molecule which may eventually enjoy less restriction of some motions than in common solvents. [Pg.21]

The limiting cases are limvo 0 a = 1 and limy. x a = 0. To evaluate the saturation matrix we restrict each element to a well-defined interval, specified in the following way As for most biochemical rate laws na nt 1, the saturation parameter of substrates usually takes a value between zero and unity that determines the degree of saturation of the respective reaction. In the case of cooperative behavior with a Hill coefficient = = ,> 1, the saturation parameter is restricted to the interval [0, n] and, analogously, to the interval [0, n] for inhibitory interaction with na = 0 and n = , > 1. Note that the sigmoidality of the rate equation is not specifically taken into account, rather the intervals for hyperbolic and sigmoidal functions overlap. [Pg.194]

LT-FAB mass spectra are obtained during thawing of the frozen solution in the ion source of the mass spectrometer, thereby allowing to employ almost any solvent as matrix in LT-FAB-MS. Consequently, neither volatility nor unwanted chemical reactions with the matrix restrict the choice of a matrix. Instead, the solvent matrix may be tailored to the analyte s requirements. [Pg.397]

Examination of the matrix given in Table XV brings up an item of special interest. If the combination s4 of atomic oxygen were assumed not to occur, we would still be able to produce ethylene oxide by a combination of the first three steps. This scheme could place a lower limit on the selectivity at 6 7 or 85.7%, corresponding to a simple overall reaction rather than a multiple overall reaction. This serves to illustrate that we get fewer overall reactions than would be predicted by considering only the atom-by-species matrix, as a result of a more restricted choice of possible steps. [Pg.302]

Notice that the number NA of atoms is usually small compared to the number NS of species, and hence the RAND algorithm is very effective in terms of computational effort. The rank of the atom matrix, however, must be equal to the number NA of atoms. At this point it is interesting to remark that instead of the atom matrix we can use a virtual atom matrix, i.e., the matrix of reaction invariant coefficients if the atom matrix is not available or we are interested in a restricted equilibrium. For details see Section 1.8.1. [Pg.133]

This is a very restricted oxidation state of copper but may be considered to occur in the polynuclear copper species Cu2, Cu3 and Cus, which have been characterized by matrix isolation techniques. Copper(O) also occurs in species formed by the reaction of copper metal vapour and carbon monoxide gas. Matrix isolation techniques have characterized a monomeric [Cu(CO)3] trigonal planar species and a dimeric [(CO)3CuCu(CO)3] species.32... [Pg.535]


See other pages where Restricted Reaction Matrices is mentioned: [Pg.52]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.1083]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.947]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.848]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.284]   


SEARCH



Reaction matrix

© 2024 chempedia.info