Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Removing false positives

From Fig. 4.21, it can be observed that only one component gave rise to the true loss of m/z 129. In turn this will mean that more time will have to be spent reviewing meticulously the data acquired to remove false positives. Furthermore, due to the fact that not always the loss of m/z 129 will be present due to the nature of the... [Pg.180]

Step 7 Frequency analysis (to identify relevant terms) to prioritize the corrterrts Step 8 Build the network based on relationships (ML appUed to remove false positives ). Optimize the ML tools to build the models to automatically alert the relationships between terms (molecule-disease, molecrrle-target, molecirle-activity) with confidence score Step 9 Network analysis and interpretation... [Pg.426]

The inclusion of the number of protons at each chemical shift proved to be key the number of false positives increased 5-7 fold (depending on how diverse the set of test compounds were) if this parameter was excluded. Various refinements were tested, but the most successful was the J Filter which disallowed a combination in which the number of couplings measured at a given chemical shift in the experimental spectrum was greater than in the predicted. This proved to be particularly valuable in the differentiation of isomers, where changes in the overall table of chemical shifts alone, could be quite subtle. The inconsistent appearance of labile protons in the experimental spectrum reduced the accuracy and it was asserted that where possible, they should be removed from both the experimental spectrum and the predicted spectrum. The mismatch level not only encoded the divergence of the experimental spectrum and the postulated structure, but also encoded... [Pg.234]

One-third of these appeared in the actives for the assay, which was defined using a 30% inhibition threshold. The overall hit rate for the assay was 2.0% in other words, 20% of the actives were false positives due to extreme optical interference with the assay readout. This number rises depending on the level of initial fluorescence used as a cutoff in the selection scheme used by the project team at the time, almost half of the actives were rejected as false positives on the basis of the initial fluorescence readings. The corporate screening collection has been reformatted since then, and many of these problem compounds have been removed. [Pg.148]

Filtering out uninteresting molecules up front carries a number of significant benefits. It removes large numbers of false positives, leading to an increase in confirmation rate... [Pg.169]

Be sure to remove the extraembryonic membrane. Failure to do this may result in the lower colorimetric detection due to the reduced penetration of the probe. If technically difficult, the extraembryonic membrane should be at least partially torn. Additionally, be sure to puncture the vesicular structures such as brain, heart, and otic vesicles to prevent the false-positive staining caused by trapping of the probe. [Pg.177]

Next, we used an in-house library design software (see details in Chapter 15) to enumerate the virtual libraries and then calculated various physical properties. Products were removed from consideration if MW is > 300, number of rotatable bonds > 3, and ClogP > 3. For solubility, two in-house model calculations were applied as filters turbidimetric >10 mg/mL and thermodynamic solubility >100 xM. The resulting cherry-picked library was then reviewed by NMR spectroscopists to remove compounds with possible artifacts, likely to be insoluble, or likely to be false positive. These included some conjugated systems and compounds with likelihood of indistinct NMR spectra. [Pg.225]

Meldal and co-workers26,27 first described the fluorescence-quenching approach to screen the OBOC combinatorial libraries for protease substrates. A fluorescence-quench combinatorial library prepared from the porous PEGA bead resin (see above) is first inspected under a fluorescent microscope and the fluorescent beads are removed and discarded. After all of the false-positive beads have been removed, the peptide beads are transferred into an Eppendorf tube and washed 5 x with water, followed by a 5 x wash with the appropriate protease buffer. Protease is then added... [Pg.314]

Exact mass filter exclusion based on the decimal places of a parent dmg, is a post processing filter which allows complete removal of unexpected entities (ions) which do not agree with the criteria preset by the user. Such a filter is fully adjustable once the samples have been processed. This process can dramatically reduce the number of ions in the analyte sample by filtering out the vast majority of matrix-related ions. This will also allow use of very low threshold values to detect low-level metabolites without having to go through the very tedious and long task of manual exclusion of false positives. Typically, extracted ion chromatogram windows of 0.1 mDa allow the... [Pg.173]

Therefore, using these hypothetical assumptions it is possible to remove unwanted false positives from the data processing step. However, if a compound contains... [Pg.174]

Applying various cleanup techniques to remove naturally occurring compounds and taking measures to eliminate trace level contamination in the glassware can considerably reduce the detrimental effects of these interferences on analysis of pesticides, herbicides, and PCBs. Even so, they are a major source of elevated detection limits and false positive results in... [Pg.220]

Sample cleanup is particularly important for analytical separations such as GC, HPLC, and electrophoresis. Many solid matrices, such as soil, can contain hundreds of compounds. These produce complex chromatograms, where the identification of analytes of interest becomes difficult. This is especially true if the analyte is present at a much lower concentration than the interfering species. So a cleanup step is necessary prior to the analytical measurements. Another important issue is the removal of high-boiling materials that can cause a variety of problems. These include analyte adsorption in the injection port or in front of a GC-HPLC column, false positives from interferences that fall within the retention window of the analyte, and false negatives because of a shift in the retention time window. [Pg.22]


See other pages where Removing false positives is mentioned: [Pg.100]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.534]    [Pg.660]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.472]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.235]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.173 ]




SEARCH



False position

False positives

© 2024 chempedia.info