Release experiments, procedure

Recently we attempted to prepare monosize PLA particles in micron size range as carriers for potential colloidal drug delivery formulations. We prepared PLA particles in a wide size range of 1-50 im by a conventional solvent evaporation method and its modified form. A tuberculostatic drug (i.e., rifampicin) was loaded in these particles. Here, the preparation procedure, the results of drug loading and release experiments of PLA are briefly presented. Details of these studies can be found elsewhere (90,91). 

Typical events that are considered are fire, explosion, ship collision, and the failure of pressurized storage vessels for which historical data established the failure frequencies. Assessment of consequences was based partly on conservative treatment of past experience. For example ilic assessment of the number of casualties from the release of a toxic material was based on past histoiy conditioned by knowledge of the toxicology and the prevailing weather conditions. An altemati. e used fault trees to estimate probabilities and identify the consequences. Credit is taken in this process for preventative measures in design, operation, and maintenance procedures. Historical data provide reliability expected from plant components and humans. 

On the basis of these redox potentials it seems likely that direct electron release to the benzenediazonium ion takes place only with iodide. This corresponds well with experience in organic synthesis iodo-de-diazoniations are possible without catalysts, light, or other special procedures (Sec. 10.6). For bromo- and chloro-de-di-azoniations, catalysis by cuprous salts (Sandmeyer reaction, Sec. 10.5) is necessary. For fluorination the Balz-Schiemann reaction of arenediazonium tetrafluoroborates in the solid state (thermolysis) or in special solvents must be chosen (see Sec. 10.4). With astatide (211At-), the heaviest of the halide ions, Meyer et al. (1979) found higher yields for astato-de-diazoniation than for iodo-de-diazoniation, a result consistent with the position of At in the Periodic System. It has to be emphasized, however, that in investigations based on measuring yields of final products (Ar-Hal), the possibility that part of the yield may be due to heterolytic dediazoniation is very difficult to quantify. 

Several antiinflammatory compounds have been formulated in lactide/ glycolide polymers (107-111). Methylprednisolone microspheres based on an 85 15 DL-lactide/glycolide copolymer were developed for intra-articulate administration (111). The microspheres, prepared by a solvent evaporation procedure, are 5—20 jam in diameter and are designed to release low levels of the steroid over a extended period in the joint. Controlled experiments in rabbits with induced arthritis showed that the microspheres afforded an antiinflammatory response for up to 5 months following a single injection. 

Several scouting experiments were performed to find the best pH conditions. Figure 3 reports the ratio between the PG specific activity measured after the purification procedure (ASf) and the initial PG specific activity (ASi). At pH 3.5, the microspheres are able to remove from the broth the major part of the protein without PG activity, thus providing a four time increase of the enzyme specific activity. The purified PG from Kluyveromyces marxianus was immobilised following the above procedure. Batch reactions in the packed bed reactor were done to evaluate the biocatalyst stability. After an initial loss, due to enzyme release, the residual PG activity reaches a plateau value corresponding to about 40% of the initial activity. Probably, some broth component interfered during the immobilisation reaction weakening the protein-carrier interactions. 

The fundamental issue is to describe how much of the residue can be characterized accurately and whether an accounting of the applied mass of pesticide can be maintained throughout the course of the experiment. A series of environmental fate studies is required for pesticide registration in order to characterize the degradation pathways and formation and decline patterns of each major degradate. These studies are typically conducted in the laboratory under controlled conditions, applying radiolabeled pesticides to evaluate the extraction efficiency of various procedures. When standard extraction methods fail to release a significant amount of the applied radioactivity, more efficient and exhaustive extraction procedures are tried in a stepwise fashion... 

A summary of the most important experimental findings of Chamoun (H), along with a description of the experimental apparatus and procedure, is presented in this chapter. In particular, the experiments have shown which factors (such as pH, ionic strength, etc.) control the release of non-Brownian particles and also have proven that the initial particle release mechanism is rolling rather than sliding. 

The first belief in the possibility of enzyme stabilization on a silica matrix was stated by Dickey in 1955, but he did not give experimental evidence, only mentioning that his experiments were unsuccessful [65]. A sol-gel procedure for enzyme immobilization in silica was first developed by Johnson and Whateley in 1971 [66]. The entrapped trypsin retained about 34 % of its tryptic activity observed in solution before the encapsulation. Furthermore, the enzyme was not released from the silica matrix by washing, demonstrating the increased stability and working pH range. Unfortunately, the article did not attract attention, although their method contained all the details that may be found in the present-day common approach. This was probably due to its publication in a colloid journal that was not read by biochemists. 

The tritiated version could be prepared from tritiated formic acid which we had prepared at high specific activity (2.5 Ci mmol-1) by a metal-catalyzed hydrogen-tritium exchange procedure using T2 gas. The material can be stored either as a solid or as a solution if the latter any release of tritium by back exchange can be easily monitored by 3H NMR spectroscopy. In our experience very little exchange occurs over several weeks of storage [51]. 

In an isoperibolic experiment, the jacket temperature of the sample container (or the surroundings of the container, i.e., the oven temperature) is held constant. On attaining a steady-state, a temperature difference between the sample and jacket may be obtained, which becomes (1) zero (within the detection limit of the equipment) if no energy is released from the sample, or (2) positive if energy is released due to chemical reaction or decomposition. If no temperature difference is recorded after a fixed time interval, the oven temperature is increased (typically 5°C) and held constant once again. This procedure is repeated until an exothermic event is observed. 

The procedure may start with the reference experiment, which, in the case under analysis, involved a solution of ferrocene in cyclohexane (ferrocene is a nonphotoreactive substance that converts all the absorbed 366 nm radiation into heat). With the shutter closed, the calorimeter was calibrated using the Joule effect, as described in chapter 8, yielding the calibration constant s. The same solution was then irradiated for a given period of time t (typically, 2-3 min), by opening the shutter. The heat released during this period (g0, determined from the temperature against time plot and from the calibration constant (see chapter 8), leads to the radiant power (radiant energy per second) absorbed by the solution, P = /t. ... 

The main experiment followed a similar procedure. The Joule calibration yields e. The cyclohexane solution of Cr(CO)6 and piperidine was irradiated for a period t. The heat released (Q) provided A0bs H via equation 10.5. If/ / t, then Q derived from the reference experiment needs to be multiplied by t/t. Alternatively, we can simply derive the rate of temperature increase during the irradiation. This rate multiplied by e is equal to rate of heat production (Q/t), which Adamson and co-workers called F. The difference between the radiant power (P) and F gives A0bsH/t. 

The fundamental basis for virtually all a prion mathematical models of air pollution is the statement of conservation of mass for each pollutant species. The formulation of a mathematical model of air poUution involves a number of basic steps, the first of which is a detaUed examination of the basis of the description of the diffusion of material released into the atmosphere. The second step requires that the form of interaction among the various physical and chemical processes be specified and tested against independent experiments. Once the appropriate mathematical descriptions have been formulated, it is necessary to implement suitable solution procedures. The final step is to assess the ability of the model to predict actual ambient concentration distributions. 

---