Relational databases, features

All modern relational databases include the ability to export tables as XML files. It is usually possible to apply an XSLT transformation to the data as part of the export procedure. In the interest of simplicity and compatibility across different databases, no special transformation was applied to the tables extracted from the New Brunswick till database. Therefore, after exporting data out of MS Access in a generic XML format, the first XSLT transformation involves restructuring the data to conform to a Geochemical Survey XML schema, developed at the GSC (Adcock 2009b). The second transformation produces a set of files which conform to the GML schema (OGC, 2007). KML shares many features with GML, and hence the third and final GML-to-KML transformation is very simple. 

The virtual SWISS-PROT entries have a far-reaching effect on TrEMBL. For example, the virtual entry for the Rubisco (ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase) large chain affects 3300 TrEMBL entries. Therefore a system has been developed to decompose these virtual entries into rules that are stored in a relational database with proper version control features. 

Spatial information. Another important difference between relational databases and image databases is that implicit spatial information is critical for interpretation of image contents, but there is no such requirement in relational databases. One approach to this problem is to extract position-independent features before searching for patterns between image datasets. 

A table is a collection of data in rows and columns. As with tables in a scientific publication, each row typically represents some entity, such as a molecule, and each column represents some attribute of the entity, such as the name, molecular weight, ionization potential, or other theoretical or experimental data measurement. A table in a publication is laid out for clarity to the reader. Spreadsheet programs typically include ways to control the layout and look of the table. Display and layout features are irrelevant in a relational database. 

There are other features of SQL that are useful for chemical relational databases. Domains, triggers, and views are objects that belong to a schema just as tables and functions. These are also discussed in later chapters that focus on practical uses. 

Many of the examples in this book and the functions in this Appendix rely on tables of data to operate. This technique of storing data separately from the function definition makes modification of the data very simple. It also uses all of the data integrity features of a relational database. Data in these tables can be used in various ways, not only in the functions for which they were intended. 

The Kodak Registry at Columbus will continue despite Kodak s purchase of MACCS. Certain features of the CAS system are essential. At the moment the MACCS system is updated once a month with CAS input. Kodak is negotiating with CAS for electronic daily transfer of connection tables and their system from Columbus to Rochester. Kodak propose to add more subset indicators to their Registry ADMS and Unk in more data files once MACCS-II and a relational database management system have been implemented. They will continue training users. Various Kodak/CAS/MDL enhancements and the implementation of new technologies are planned. 

A solution to this is to build the lexicon as a relational database. In this, we have exactly one entry for each word. Each entry contains a number of uniquely identified fields, each of which has a single value. For for a simple word, the entry may just contain two fields, ORTHOGRAPHY and PRONUNCIATION. It is a simple matter to add more fields such as POS or SYNCAT. Each entry in a relational database can also be seen as a feature structure of the type we are now familiar with, and because of this similarity, we will use the feature structure terminology for ease of... 

This paper proposes extensions to the relational database model that allow chemical structure and other complex data types to be included in a relational database. It is argued that this approach provides benefits over the common practice of storing chemical structures in a chemical database system and associated research data in a relational or other general database system. The design, implementation, and usage patterns of an extended relational system are discussed in the context of the Upjohn Cousin compound information system. Emerging extensibiUty features that support the proposed approach within commercially available database systems are reviewed. 

A type of database which combines aspects of the classical relational database (rows, columns, tables) with features of object-oriented databases (support for data of unusual types or with inner structure, inheritance relationships, or user-defined functions which perform complex operations on data). See Full-text Database Object-oriented Database and Relational Database. 

We start with a definition of the problem and based on this, we identify the candidates (such as, molecules, mixtures and formulations) through expert knowledge, database search, model-based search, or a combination of all. The next step is to perform experiments and/or model-based simulations (of product behavior) to identify a feasible set of candidates. At this stage, issues related to process design are introduced and a process-product match is obtained. The final test is related to product quality and performance verification. Other features, such as life cycle assessment could also be introduced at this stage. 

---