Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reflection coefficient of the surface

The release rate (dM/dt) of a dmg from an osmotic pump can be described as Cd (dV/dt) where Cd is the dmg solubility in its reservoir compartment. The effective surface area, permeability coefficient, thickness, and osmotic reflection coefficient of the semi-permeable membrane used for the pump are 3.0 cm2, 0.7 10-4 cm2/day, 500 pm, and 0.8, respectively. Initially, the pump has a reservoir compartment with a dmg having Cd of 100 mg/ml, and the observed Ax is 100 atm. If we change the reservoir medium and osmotic agent to increase Cd of the dmg from 100 to 300 mg/ml and to increase Ax from 100 to 300 atm, by how much will the release rate of the dmg increase ... [Pg.103]

Dipole scattering does not require an atomistic theory. A phenomenological theory suffices, which includes a response function dependent on dielectric constants. The cross-section for dipole scattering based on these assumptions is given in Eqs, 3.7 and 3.9 of Ibach and Mills./61/ These formulae include plane-wave reflection coefficients from the surface, which are solutions of the standard LEED problem. Since dipole scattering involves essentially only forward scattering, it is not necessary in practice to adopt the spherical-wave picture of our step 2 (cf. section 3.4.3), the plane-wave approach is adequate in this situation. [Pg.74]

The effect of reflected light is very noticeable in an empty coke oven. The reflection coefficient of the brick walls is comparatively high. If a perfect mirror were placed parallel to a glowing surface the mirror would appear as hot as the surface. This effect of reflection takes place in a coke oven so that both walls appear of approximately equal brightness even though they may differ considerably in temperature. Frequently a patch of the wall on one side becomes coated with a layer of coke. Since the coke has a higher emissive power than brick this patch appears much hotter. [Pg.452]

Let us next consider a metal hoUow-optical fiber with dielectric inner coating. When the coating thickness is properly designed, the dielectric layer enhances reflection in a specific wavelength range owing to the interference effect. Let us consider a metal surface coated with a dielectric film of thickness d as shown in Fig. 2. From Fresnel s formula, the reflection coefficient of the electric field on boundary I is expressed as... [Pg.180]

In reflectance spectroscopy, the incident light of intensity T is reflected upon the electrode surface (external reflection mpde), which is either free of absorbing species - reflected intensity l(o) = R(o) I or covered by an absorbing layer of thickness d - reflected intensity 1(d) = R(d) 1° -, where R(o) and R(d) are the reflectivity coefficients of the electrode surface, without and with the absorbing layer, respectively. The relative reflectivity change, 6R/R, of the surface, is thus defined as ... [Pg.550]

Here rip and ris are the Fresnel reflection coefficients of the film surface, and r2p and rzs the Fresnel coefficients at the film-substrate interface. These in turn can be calculated from the material properties and wave directions, so that ... [Pg.1033]

The part of the flux entering the detector should be as large as possible. This means that the detector stmcture should be optimized in order to maximize it, e.g., by decreasing the reflection coefficient of the incident surface and by maximizing the optical to electrical surface ratio. [Pg.39]

The diffuse reflection coefficient of the crystal side surface was taken equal to = 0.18 for radiation coming from the gas and = 0.823 for radiation coming from the crystal. The first value was obtained by averaging of the Fresnel reflection coefficient over an incident angle, while the second follows from relation between and p, Eq. (8.8). The specular reflection coefficient was calculated by the Fresnel formulae. The reflection coefficient of a free surface of a melt is unknown at present and was taken equal to p both for diffuse and specular reflection that can be justified by a small difference between refraction index of solid and hquid phases. The latter, along with opacity of the melt, permits consideration of the... [Pg.214]

The plasma-wall interaction of the neutral particles is described by a so-called sticking model [136, 137]. In this model only the radicals react with the surface, while nonradical neutrals (H2, SiHa, and Si H2 +2) are reflected into the discharge. The surface reaction and sticking probability of each radical must be specified. The nature (material, roughness) and the temperature of the surface will influence the surface reaction probabilities. Perrin et al. [136] and Matsuda et al. [137] have shown that the surface reaction coefficient of SiH3 is temperature-independent at a value of = 0.26 0.05 at a growing a-Si H surface in a... [Pg.39]

The presence of adsorbed layers also affects the other parameters of the interaction between metastable atoms and a metal surface. Titley et al. [136] have shown that the presence of an adsorbed layer of oxygen on a W( 110) surface increases the reflection coefficient of helium metastable atoms. The reflection is of irregular nature and grows higher when the incidence angle of the initial beam increases. A series of publications [132, 136, 137] indicate that the presence of adsorbed layers causes an increase in the quantum yield of electron emission from a metal under the action of rare gas metastable atoms. [Pg.322]

Doyen [158] was one who theoretically examined the reflection of metastable atoms from a solid surface within the framework of a quantum- mechanical model based on the general properties of the solid body symmetry. From the author s viewpoint the probability of metastable atom reflection should be negligibly small, regardless of the chemical nature of the surface involved. However, presence of defects and inhomogeneities of a surface formed by adsorbed layers should lead to an abrupt increase in the reflection coefficient, so that its value can approach the relevant gaseous phase parameter on a very inhomogeneous surface. [Pg.326]

Before in situ external reflectance FTIR can be employed quantitatively to the study of near-electrode processes, one final experimental problem must be overcome the determination of the thickness of the thin layer between electrode and window. This is a fundamental aspect of the application of this increasingly important technique, marking an obstacle that must be overcome if it is to attain its true potential, due to the dearth of extinction coefficients in the IR available in the literature. In the study of adsorbed species this determination is unimportant, as the extinction coefficients of the absorption bands of the surface species can be determined via coulometry. [Pg.217]


See other pages where Reflection coefficient of the surface is mentioned: [Pg.62]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.951]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.922]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.696]    [Pg.602]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.825]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.41]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.552 ]




SEARCH



Coefficient of the

Reflection coefficients

Surface reflectance

Surface reflectivity

© 2024 chempedia.info