Reference electrode double layers

In solution, all electrodes are surrounded by a layer of water molecules, ions, and other atomic or molecular species. We will not look in depth at this topic, except to refer to the two principle layers, which are named after one of the original pioneers of electrochemistry, namely the nineteen-century great, Hermann Helmholtz. The two Helmholtz layers are often said to comprise the electrode double-layer (or electric double-layer ). 

Residual currents, also referred to as background currents, are the sum of faradaic and nonfaradaic currents that arise from the solvent/electrolyte blank. Faradaic processes from impurities may be practically eliminated by the careful experimentalist, but the nonfaradaic currents associated with charging of the electrode double layer (Chap. 2) are inherent to the nature of a potential sweep experiment. Equation 23.5 describes the relationship between this charging current icc, the double-layer capacitance Cdl, the electrode area A, and the scan rate v ... 

While many of the standard electroanalytical techniques utilized with metal electrodes can be employed to characterize the semiconductor-electrolyte interface, one must be careful not to interpret the semiconductor response in terms of the standard diagnostics employed with metal electrodes. Fundamental to our understanding of the metal-electrolyte interface is the assumption that all potential applied to the back side of a metal electrode will appear at the metal electrode surface. That is, in the case of a metal electrode, a potential drop only appears on the solution side of the interface (i.e., via the electrode double layer and the bulk electrolyte resistance). This is not the case when a semiconductor is employed. If the semiconductor responds in an ideal manner, the potential applied to the back side of the electrode will be dropped across the internal electrode-electrolyte interface. This has two implications (1) the potential applied to a semiconducting electrode does not control the electrochemistry, and (2) in most cases there exists a built-in barrier to charge transfer at the semiconductor-electrolyte interface, so that, electrochemical reversible behavior can never exist. In order to understand the radically different response of a semiconductor to an applied external potential, one must explore the solid-state band structure of the semiconductor. This topic is treated at an introductory level in References 1 and 2. A more complete discussion can be found in References 3, 4, 5, and 6, along with a detailed review of the photoelectrochemical response of a wide variety of inorganic semiconducting materials. 

The chemical system at the surface will be quite complex. There will be strongly bound species at various sites on the metal surface. Where these are ionic, the electric field established at the surface will tend to attract ions of opposite charge from the solution. The first layer has been termed the electrode double layer, while the gegenion distribution in the solution is called the diffuse double layer. A theoretical analysis of the double layer has been made by Gouy and Chapman and adapted to kinetic analysis by Stern. For references, and discussion see paper by D. C. Grahame, J. Chem, Phys, 21, 1054 (1953). 

Figure Bl.28.8. Equivalent circuit for a tliree-electrode electrochemical cell. WE, CE and RE represent the working, counter and reference electrodes is the solution resistance, the uncompensated resistance, R the charge-transfer resistance, R the resistance of the reference electrode, the double-layer capacitance and the parasitic loss to tire ground.

On the electrode side of the double layer the excess charges are concentrated in the plane of the surface of the electronic conductor. On the electrolyte side of the double layer the charge distribution is quite complex. The potential drop occurs over several atomic dimensions and depends on the specific reactivity and atomic stmcture of the electrode surface and the electrolyte composition. The electrical double layer strongly influences the rate and pathway of electrode reactions. The reader is referred to several excellent discussions of the electrical double layer at the electrode—solution interface (26-28). 

The potential difference across the electric double layer A. This cannot be determined in absolute terms but must be defined with reference to another charged interface, i.e. a reference electrode. In the case of a corroding metal the potential is the corrosion potential which arises from the mutual polarisation of the anodic and cathodic reactions constituting the overall corrosion reaction see Section 1.4). 

FIGURE 1-13 Double-layer capacitance of a mercury drop electrode in NaF solutions of different concentrations. (Reproduced with permission from reference 5.)... 

Figure 5.18. Schematic representation of the density of states N(E) in the conduction band and of the definitions of work function d>, chemical potential of electrons p, electrochemical potential of electrons or Fermi level p, surface potential x> Galvani (or inner) potential

The constancy of 0R with changing potential is also remarkable, as expected for a reference electrode. The deviation from Eq. (7.11) for negative potentials is due to the removal of O2 and concomitant destruction of the effective double layer. 

The reasons are analyzed in detail in Chapter 5. The equation is valid as long as the effective double layer is present at the metal/gas interfaces of the working and reference electrodes. Deviations are basically observed when ion backspillover is not faster than ion desorption or reaction (see also section 11.3). 

When the area A of the eleetrode/solution interface with a redox system in the solution varies (e.g. when using a streaming mercury electrode), the double layer capacity which is proportional to A, varies too. The corresponding double layer eharging current has to be supplied at open eireuit eonditions by the Faradaic current of the redox reaction. The associated overpotential can be measured with respect to a reference electrode. By measuring the overpotential at different capaeitive eurrent densities (i.e. Faradaic current densities) the current density vs. eleetrode potential relationship can be determined, subsequently kinetic data can be obtained [65Del3]. (Data obtained with this method are labelled OC.)... 

On the basis of this argument, the mechanism for the current oscillation and the multilayer formation can be explained as follows. First note that U is kept constant externally with a potentiostat in the present case. In the high-current stage of the current oscillation, the tme electrode potential (or Helmholtz double layer potential), E, is much more positive than U because E is given hy E=U —JAR, where A is the electrode area, R is the resistance of the solution between the electrode surface and the reference electrode, andj is taken as negative for the reduction current. This implies that, even if U is kept constant in the region of the NDR, is much more... 

The Vacuum Reference The first reference in the double-reference method enables the surface potential of the metal slab to be related to the vacuum scale. This relationship is determined by calculating the workfunction of the model metal/water/adsorbate interface, including a few layers of water molecules. The workfunction, — < ermi. is then used to calibrate the system Fermi level to an electrochemical reference electrode. It is convenient to choose the normal hydrogen electrode (NHE), as it has been experimentally and theoretically determined that the NHE potential is —4.8 V with respect to the free electron in a vacuum [Wagner, 1993]. We therefore apply the relationship... 

Nonfaradaic components associated with the uncompensated resistance between reference electrodes (7 ) and the double layer capacitance (Qi) can be accurately determined by AC impedance measurements. In this technique, a small AC potential perturbation is superimposed to the DC bias, and the resulting AC current is measured as a function of the frequency of modulation. The simplest circuit considered for a polarizable... 

FIG. 7 Simplified equivalent circuit for charge-transfer processes at externally biased ITIES. The parallel arrangement of double layer capacitance (Cdi), impedance of base electrolyte transfer (Zj,) and electron-transfer impedance (Zf) is coupled in series with the uncompensated resistance (R ) between the reference electrodes. (Reprinted from Ref. 74 with permission from Elsevier Science.)... 

The system developed by O Grady is reproduced in Fig. 9. A key element of this arrangement is the electrochemical thin layer cell, using a combined Pd-hydrogen reference and counter electrode, thus minimizing the amount of electrolyte necessary for the electrochemical treatment. This type of cell is particularly useful for double layer studies but cannot be used for gas evolution or corrosion experiments at higher current densities. For a collection and discussion of other transfer systems the reader is referred to the review article by Sherwood [43]. 

The concentration overpotential i/c is the component of the overpotential due to concentration gradients in the electrolyte solution near the electrode, not including the electric double layer. The concentration overpotential is usually identified with the Nernst potential of the working electrode with respect to the reference electrode that is, the thermodynamic electromotive force (emf) of a concentration cell formed between the working electrode (immersed in electrolyte depleted of reacting species) and the reference electrode (of the same kind but immersed in bulk electrolyte solution) ... 

---