Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reciprocal orbitals functions

II electronic states, 638-640 vibronic coupling, 628-631 triatomic molecules, 594-598 Hamiltonian equations, 612-615 pragmatic models, 620-621 Kramers doublets, geometric phase theory linear Jahn-Teller effect, 20-22 spin-orbit coupling, 20-22 Kramers-Kronig reciprocity, wave function analycity, 201 -205 Kramers theorem ... [Pg.83]

Figure 10. Comparison of the velocity dependence of the disappearance cross-section of CHa+, formation cross-section of CH0 +, and Langevin orbiting collision cross-section, all as a function of reciprocal average kinetic energy of ions in the mass spectrometer source... Figure 10. Comparison of the velocity dependence of the disappearance cross-section of CHa+, formation cross-section of CH0 +, and Langevin orbiting collision cross-section, all as a function of reciprocal average kinetic energy of ions in the mass spectrometer source...
We examine now a numerical test of the reciprocal of this description if a function satisfies this description, then it is the optimised orbital of. If both the deseription and the reciprocal are true we can conclude that the description is complete. [Pg.34]

As a simple example to illustrate reciprocal-space solutions to the many-center one-particle problem, we can think of an electron moving in the Coulomb potential of two nuclei, with nuclear charges Zi and Z2, located respectively at positions Xi and X2. In the crude approximation where we use only a single Is orbital on each nucleus, we can represent the electronic wave function of this system by ... [Pg.215]

The theory of the / -matrix was developed in nuclear physics. As usually presented, the theory makes use of a Green function to relate value and slope of the radial channel orbitals at r, expanding these functions for r < r as linear combinations of basis functions that satisfy fixed boundary conditions at r. The true logarithmic derivative (or reciprocal of the / -matrix in multichannel formalism)... [Pg.147]

Fig. 7. Intensity (arbitrary units) as a function of final electron energy for emission from an s orbital adsorbed (a) in the position (0, 0, a) and (b) in the position (a/2, a/2, aj2), relative to the substrate. Single scattering (solid curves), multiple scattering (dotted curves), and no scattering (dashed curves). The arrows indicate the resonance energies specified by the reciprocal lattice vectors, and the corresponding band crossings in the free-electron band structure at the top of the figure. Fig. 7. Intensity (arbitrary units) as a function of final electron energy for emission from an s orbital adsorbed (a) in the position (0, 0, a) and (b) in the position (a/2, a/2, aj2), relative to the substrate. Single scattering (solid curves), multiple scattering (dotted curves), and no scattering (dashed curves). The arrows indicate the resonance energies specified by the reciprocal lattice vectors, and the corresponding band crossings in the free-electron band structure at the top of the figure.
First, the irreducible part of the Brillouin zone now varies from k = 0 to k = Tr/d = tt/2d. Indeed, doubling the parameter of the unit cell in real space halves the size of the Brillouin zone (or the reciprocal-space unit cell). Second, recall that orbital interactions are additive and that the final MO diagram (or band structure) is just the result of the sum of all the orbital interactions. Within each individual H2 unit the interactions simply correspond to the bonding (a) and antibonding (a ) MOs of each individual H2 unit. There are three types of interactions involving the MOs of different H2 units interactions between all the a orbitals interactions between all the a orbitals and interactions between the a and the a orbitals. Since all the an orbitals are equivalent by translational symmetry, their interaction is described by the Bloch function ... [Pg.217]

In the theoretical description of regular polymers, the monoelectronic levels (orbital energies in the molecular description) are represented as a multivalued function of a reciprocal wave number defined in the inverse space dimension. The set of all those branches (energy bands) plotted versus the reciprocal wave number (k-point) in a well defined region of the reciprocal space (first Brillouin zone) is the band structure of the polymers. In the usual terminology, we note the analogy between the occupied levels and the valence bands, the unoccupied levels and the conduction band. [Pg.151]

If the electron density is known correctly, then structure factors and their relative phases can be computed by Fourier transform techniques. The calculation of X-ray scattering factors from the computed orbital electron densities as a function of distance from the nucleus, shown in Figure 6.19, provides an example of this. In a crystal structure analysis it is possible, from the measured diffraction pattern (structure factors and their phases) to compute the Fourier transform and thereby obtain an image of the entire crystal structure. In practice, only the contents of one unit cell are computed because the reciprocal lattice is the Fourier transform of the direct lattice and vice versa, so that the two transforms can be multiplied (Figure 6.17). [Pg.209]

The problem has now been transformed from treating an infinite number of orbitals (electrons) to only treating those within the unit cell. The price is that the solutions become a function of the reciprocal space vector k within the first Brillouin zone. For a system with Mbasis functions, the variation problem can be formulated as a matrix equation analogous to eq. (3.51). [Pg.114]

The slow convergence of configuration interaction (Cl) expansions in orbital basis sets is linked to the presence of the correlation cusp in the wave function. Within the molecular Hamiltonian the interelectronic Coulomb operator scales like the reciprocal of the distance between the electrons and, for the part of the configuration space where the electrons are close to each other, the Coulomb interaction diverges. However, the local energy defined as... [Pg.6]

Using reciprocity, we can thus immediately infer the SALC symmetries of the hydrogen basis functions by selecting the irreps that subduce a in the case of the U orbitals and b in the case of the bending coordinates ... [Pg.76]


See other pages where Reciprocal orbitals functions is mentioned: [Pg.130]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.72]   


SEARCH



Orbital functionals

Reciprocal functions

© 2024 chempedia.info