Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Diffraction pattern measured

Scheme 3 The solid yielded by mechanical mixing of the reactants can be used to seed crystal growth from solution to obtain crystals for single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiments. This procedure allows one to compare the X-ray powder diffraction pattern measured on the mechanochemical sample with that calculated on the basis of the single-crystal experiment for the solids obtained by crystallization via seeding of a solution of the ground powder of the adduct... Scheme 3 The solid yielded by mechanical mixing of the reactants can be used to seed crystal growth from solution to obtain crystals for single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiments. This procedure allows one to compare the X-ray powder diffraction pattern measured on the mechanochemical sample with that calculated on the basis of the single-crystal experiment for the solids obtained by crystallization via seeding of a solution of the ground powder of the adduct...
The most serious limitation of XRD as a catalyst characterization method is often related to the fact that many of the phases present in a catalyst may not give rise to any well-defined diffraction line at all. Absence of a diffraction pattern is a consequence of the requirement that a structure must contain a periodicity extending more than about 2-3 nm to yield a diffraction pattern measurable in a sense of the Bragg equation [Eq. (1)]. Thus, particles or domains with sizes smaller than 2-3 nm will appear to be X-ray amorphous in XRD experiments i.e., they do not exhibit sharp diffraction lines. [Pg.317]

Crystallite size determined from the diffraction pattern measurements are given in Table XI and show the higher degree of three-dimensional ordering of Acheson graphite compared with Desulco,... [Pg.216]

The phase compositions of the gels were determined from their X-ray diffraction patterns, measured on a Philips "X Pert-MPD using Cu K radiation = 0.1518 nm) between 20-60° 20 in steps of 29 = 0.05°. The identification of the anatase, rutile and brookite phases were made by comparison with the corresponding standards. The fractions of these three phases in the gels were calculated as relative amounts from the intensities of the major peaks of each phase. Absolute concentrations could not be given due to the possible presence of amorphous material. [Pg.739]

The classical method for solving the phase problem in macromolecular crystal structures, known as isomorphous replacement, dates back to the earliest days of protein crystallography.10,16 The concept is simple enough we introduce into the protein crystal an atom or atoms heavy enough to affect the diffraction pattern measurably. We aim to figure out first where those atoms are (the heavy atom substructure) by subtracting away the protein component, and then bootstrap — use the phases based on the heavy atom substructure to solve — the structure of the protein. [Pg.68]

The droplets in this study typically had volume median diameters of around 10 pm. In a typical experiment droplets of the desired concentration and composition were cooled from ambient temperatures at a rate of 10 K min to 173 K where a diffraction pattern between 19 and 50° was measured. The intensity ratio I44/ I40 as a function of droplet freezing temperature, determined from the diffraction patterns measured in these experiments, has been reported previously. In Figure 6 we report the fraction of cubic ice as a function of droplet freezing temperature for each of the solute systems, determined using the relationship described in Figure 4. [Pg.424]

Consequently, if the peak shifts for one or more peaks are measured as a function of T in the range (0, ujl) at y and y + re for three fixed values of y e.g., 0, 71/4 and nj2) the stress tensor elements 5, can be determined from the intercept and the slopes of these lines. It is presumed that the single-crystal elastic constants are known and the diffraction elastic constants in Equations (109) and (110) can be calculated following one of the models presented before. This is the conventional sin T method. Alternatively Equation (107) can be used in a least-square analysis or implemented in the Rietveld codes. If diffraction patterns measured in several points (T, y) are available the stress tensor elements 5,- can be refined together with the structural and other parameters. The implementation in GSAS is the Voigt formula Equation (90) and not Equation (107). In this case refinable parameters are the strain tensor elements e,. [Pg.362]

Left Illustrated diffraction pattern measured with a two-dimensional MAR345 image plate. Right The onedimensional representation of the same diagram. [Pg.111]

Figure 4. Section of a Laue diffraction pattern measured at RT and crystal-detector distance of358 mm ( Figure 4. Section of a Laue diffraction pattern measured at RT and crystal-detector distance of358 mm (<p=8tf, y/ 15°). Besides the Bragg reflections of four TO domains, positions of reflections from all possible domain states in the orthorhombic phase are presented (as circles), calculated with respect to the orientation matrix of domain T03.
It is known that the D structure in bulk liquid water, as deduced from diffraction patterns measured at 273 K, differs only a little from that in ice Ih, whereas the thermodynamic properties of liquid water at 273 K differ greatly from those of ice Ih. If this comparison applies to adsorbed water as well, then perhaps partial specific properties are more sensitive to structural changes than are diffraction patterns. It is also well known that the mere presence of a space-filling macromoiecule in liquid water causes the structure to be strained while strengthening some of the hydrogen bonds. In effect, some of the topological freedom in the liquid disappears and the fluctuations between bulky and compact networks of water molecules shift to favor the bulky configurations. This picture could be an accurate description, on the level of molecular structure, of how the trends listed in Table 2.5 come about. [Pg.69]

Fig. 14.15 Comparative powder neutron diffraction pattern measured for Lio.6peP04 measured at 620 K (solid-solution) and at room temperature (two-phase mixture of LiFeP04 and FeP04) using the same diffractometer HERMES... Fig. 14.15 Comparative powder neutron diffraction pattern measured for Lio.6peP04 measured at 620 K (solid-solution) and at room temperature (two-phase mixture of LiFeP04 and FeP04) using the same diffractometer HERMES...
In this section two complementary experiments have been made. The first one is related to diffraction patterns measurements for different bars holograms and the second one to a SLM characterization for holographic filters, demultiplexers and routers use with reference to the devices whose design and characteristics have been described in the ptrevious sections. Due to the unavailability of components in the laboratory with the characteristics previously described, the experimental optical bench is somewhat different from the aprpropaiate one, but, the measurements obtained are in agreement with the calculations. [Pg.268]

The total diffraction pattern measured in reciprocal-space may be interpreted in terms of a correlation function in real-space, as is discussed below. Although this approach to neutron diffraction was developed primarily for non-crystalline systems (liquids and glasses), it is increasingly being used for powder diffraction from disordered crystalline systems as well. For a disordered crystal, the correlation... [Pg.336]


See other pages where Diffraction pattern measured is mentioned: [Pg.23]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.649]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.2005]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.876]    [Pg.2538]    [Pg.578]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.171 ]




SEARCH



Diffraction measurements

Diffraction patterns

Fraunhofer diffraction pattern particle size measurements

© 2024 chempedia.info