Reactions hydroxide/carbon ratio effects

A number of other proton transfer reactions from carbon which have been studied using this approach are shown in Table 8. The results should be treated with reserve as it has not yet been established fully that the derived Bronsted exponents correspond exactly with those determined in the conventional way. One problem concerns the assumption that the activity coefficient ratios cancel, but doubts have also been raised by one of the originators of the method that, unless solvent effects on the transition state are intermediate between those on the reactants and products, anomalous Bronsted exponents will be obtained [172(c)]. The Bronsted exponents determined for menthone and the other ketones in Table 8 are roughly those expected by comparison with the values obtained for ketones using the conventional procedure (Table 2). For nitroethane the two values j3 = 0.72 and 0.65 which are shown in Table 8 result from the use of different H functions determined with amine and carbon acid indicators, respectively. Both values are roughly similar to the values (0.50 [103], 0.65 [104]), obtained by varying the base catalyst in aqueous solution. The result for 2-methyl-3-phenylpropionitrile fits in well with the exponents determined for malononitriles by general base catalysis but differs from the value j3 0.71 shown for l,4-dicyano-2-butene in Table 8. This latter result is also different from the values j3 = 0.94 and 0.98 determined for l,4-dicyano-2-butene in aqueous solution with phenolate ions and amines, respectively. However, the different results for l,4-dicyano-2-butene are to be expected, since hydroxide ion is the base catalyst used in the acidity function procedure and this does not fit the Bronsted plot observed for phenolate ions and amines. The primary kinetic isotope effects [114] also show that there are differences between the hydroxide ion catalysed reaction (feH/feD = 3.5) and the reaction catalysed by phenolate ions (kH /kP = 1.4). The result for chloroform, (3 = 0.98 shown in Table 8, fits in satisfactorily with the most recent results for amine catalysed detritiation [171(a)] from which a value 3 = 1.15 0.07 was obtained. 

Peterson and Scarrah 165) reported the transesterification of rapeseed oil by methanol in the presence of alkaline earth metal oxides and alkali metal carbonates at 333-336 K. They found that although MgO was not active for the transesterification reaction, CaO showed activity, which was enhanced by the addition of MgO. In contrast, Leclercq et al. 166) showed that the methanolysis of rapeseed oil could be carried out with MgO, although its activity depends strongly on the pretreatment temperature of this oxide. Thus, with MgO pre-treated at 823 K and a methanol to oil molar ratio of 75 at methanol reflux, a conversion of 37% with 97% selectivity to methyl esters was achieved after 1 h in a batch reactor. The authors 166) showed that the order of activity was Ba(OH)2 > MgO > NaCsX zeolite >MgAl mixed oxide. With the most active catalyst (Ba(OH)2), 81% oil conversion, with 97% selectivity to methyl esters after 1 h in a batch reactor was achieved. Gryglewicz 167) also showed that the transesterification of rapeseed oil with methanol could be catalyzed effectively by basic alkaline earth metal compounds such as calcium oxide, calcium methoxide, and barium hydroxide. Barium hydroxide was the most active catalyst, giving conversions of 75% after 30 min in a batch reactor. Calcium methoxide showed an intermediate activity, and CaO was the least active catalyst nevertheless, 95% conversion could be achieved after 2.5 h in a batch reactor. MgO and Ca(OH)2 showed no catalytic activity for rapeseed oil methanolysis. However, the transesterification reaction rate could be enhanced by the use of ultrasound as well as by introduction of an appropriate co-solvent such as THF to increase methanol solubility in the phase containing the rapeseed oil. 

A value of kH/kD = 1.4 was obtained [114] for the rate of proton transfer compared with deuteron transfer from chloroform to hydroxide ion and this result is similar to the values determined earlier for several haloforms [164, 166]. In the most recent work [171(b)] a value kH /kD = 1.11 0.05 was determined for chloroform. These values are close to those observed for reaction of cyanocarbon acids (though a different base catalyst is involved) and in Sect. 4.3 it was argued that isotope effects as low as these are expected for a transition state in which proton transfer is almost complete. The isotope effect for proton transfer from chloroform was measured using a new and useful method [114]. It can be shown that the ratio of initial rates of uptake of tritium for the first ten per cent of reaction from tritiated water into CHC13 and CDC13 is identical to the primary isotope effect for proton loss (feH /fcD). The procedure can be used for measuring isotope effects on proton transfer from carbon acids to hydroxide ion or buffer catalysts and is more convenient than other methods. Other methods which have been used, for example, involve the comparison of rates of detritiation and dedeuteration or the comparison of rates of bromination for isotopically different acids (RCH and RCD) [113]. 

A trinuclear cobalt(I) complex, PhCCo3(CO)9, can also catalyse the reduction of nitro compounds in the presence of hydroxide ion at room temperature under a normal pressure of CO [49]. Satisfactory results were obtained under phase transfer conditions. The catalyst and the aromatic nitro compounds were dissolved in benzene under carbon monoxide and an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide containing cethyltrimethylammonium bromide was added. At a substrate/cat =10 ratio, ca. 60-80 % of amine was obtained in a 18 h reaction. The reaction also proceeded in a homogeneous phase (methanol-water, methanol, dioxane-water) but with lower conversions (less than 45 %). Cobalt complexes such as MeCCo3(CO)9 and MeCo(CO)4 were also active, but less effective. At the end of the reaction, the catalyst was recovered only in part (ca. 15 %). In the organic phase, an IR absorption at 1891 cm, attributable to [Co(CO)4] anion, was observed. Strangely enough, the preformed [Co(CO)4] anion has not been tested as catalyst. The active species was supposed to be the hydride cluster anion reported in Scheme 6. 

---