Reaction velocity constant, cooled

T = average coolant temperature in reactor cooling coil H = heat of reaction (—AH > 0, exothermic) p = frequency factor in reaction velocity constant E = activation energy k = pe EIRT > 0, reaction velocity constant. 

The commercial reactor consists of 13 reactor tubes in the recycle section and five tubes in the cleanup section. Each reactor tube consists of a concentric arrangement of a 2-in. Pyrex tube into which are inserted two 40-watt fluorescent lamps, a 4-in. Karbate tube enclosing the reactor section, and an 8-in. steel pipe enclosing the cooling section. Chilled water at 60 F circulates in the annular section enclosed by the steel pipe and removes the heat of reaction, which is estimated and checked calorimetrically to be around 190,000 Btu per lb mole BHC. A reaction velocity constant... 

The burning velocity is not constant over the cone. The velocity near the tube wall is lower because of cooling by the walls. Thus, there are lower temperatures, which lead to lower reaction rates and, consequently, lower flame speeds. The top of the cone is crowded owing to the large energy release therefore, reaction rates are too high. 

For predesign calculations we consider a gas velocity of 0.5 m/s [4], Mean physical properties for the above reaction mixture are density 11.5 kg/m3, viscosity 1.5 x 10 5 N s/m2, thermal conductivity 2.9 x 1(T2 W/m K. The calculation of the heat-transfer coefficient follows the relations given in Chapter 5. Applying the relation (5.9) leads to Rep = 2090 and Nu = 412, from which the partial heat-transfer coefficient on the gas side is a = 3 50 W/m K. Taking into account other thermal resistances we adopt for the overall heat-transfer coefficient the value 250 W/m2 K. For the cooling agent we consider a constant temperature of 145 °C, which is 5 °C lower than the inlet reactor temperature. This value is a trade-off between the temperature profile that avoids the hot spot and the productivity. 

Figure 20 shows temperature profiles for three different ways of controlling the cooling stream in a partial oxidation reaction. If the coolant is circulated so fast that its temperature in the reactor scarcely changes, then its flow direction is irrelevant and a temperature profile with a pronounced temperature maximum becomes established this is typical for strongly exothermic reactions (Fig. 20A). If the coolant is circulated in cocurrent and its velocity is chosen so that it becomes noticeably hotter over its path, an almost isothermal temperature behavior can be achieved (Fig. 20B). This is because the reactive gas at the inlet is in contact with the coldest coolant and the cooling temperature rises in step with the consumption of the reactants, so that the reaction rate remains virtually constant over a fairly long section [33-35, 40],...

The bed material consisted of a mixture of the powder sample and quartz sand in order to obtain a constant space velocity (25000 h ) for all tested catalysts. The gas composition used in the experiments was 10% O2,405 ppm NO and 911 ppm C3H6, balanced with Ar to yield a total flow of 420 ml/min. The samples were initially reduced in 5000 ppm H2 at 400°C for 15 min and stabilised in the reaction mixture at 525°C for 1 h. The samples were then cooled down to room temperature under an Ar flow. At this temperature, the catalyst was exposed to the reaction mixture under 15 min before starting the heating ramp up to 525°C, at a constant rate of 6°C/min. The steady-state experiments were performed by subsequently lowering the temperature in steps of 50°C, starting from the final ramp temperature and the products were analysed after approximately 90 min. In order to facilitate the interpretation of the flow reactor and FTIR results the model gas was simplified by omitting H O and SO2 (which would have been present if a diesel exhaust was used). 

Turbulence of the gas in the reaction vessel, as expected, affects the temperature rise of the sodium. Under comparable water-vapor concentrations, increased turbulence resulted in greater chemical activity. In comparing rims 4 and 1, it is noted that the gas rate was increased approximately sixfold while the vapor concentration was maintained constant. The resulting increase in gas velocity changed the Reynolds number (based on cross flow in the 6-inch pipe) from laminar condition to one of turbulence. The maximum temperature rise increased from 100°F. to more than 900 °F., and the utilization factor increased threefold. Although the greater turbulence increases the cooling rate to the inert-gas carrier, it also results... 

Although the experiments using this procedure are reproducible, the conditions of the reaction are inconsistent. The linear flow-viscosity of the solution decreases with the distance from the center if the solution is added in the center of the plate, and the linear velocity of the scraper increases with the radius. This produces different Reynolds numbers along the surface and different heat transfer conditions and, as a result, different temperatures are obtained by the strongly exothermic reaction of TMA and frozen water at the surface. To have more constant reaction conditions, a thin-film reactor was constructed [34]. A cooled and rotating steel band picks up ice by sublimation in a sublimation chamber and introduces the ice into the reaction chamber. Here, the ice reacts with a solution of TMA, producing MAO and methane. The better heat transfer on the steel band makes it possible to have more constant reaction temperatures. 

When a defined coolant flows at constant velocity through the jacket of a reactor filled with a reaction mixture, besides the resistance against the conduction of heat within the wall, the resistance against the transfer of heat out of the wall into the coolant is also constant. Hence, both can be combined into a total resistance 1/ tc> which depends only on the temperature of the medium in the cooling jacket. 

---