Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reaction-order model, basic

Many theoretical embellishments have been made to the basic model of pore diffusion as presented here. Effectiveness factors have been derived for reaction orders other than first and for Hougen and Watson kinetics. These require a numerical solution of Equation (10.3). Shape and tortuosity factors have been introduced to treat pores that have geometries other than the idealized cylinders considered here. The Knudsen diffusivity or a combination of Knudsen and bulk diffusivities has been used for very small pores. While these studies have theoretical importance and may help explain some observations, they are not yet developed well enough for predictive use. Our knowledge of the internal structure of a porous catalyst is still rather rudimentary and imposes a basic limitation on theoretical predictions. We will give a brief account of Knudsen diffusion. [Pg.364]

Fig. 5. Reaction of the basic system at 30 °C (second order kinetic model)... Fig. 5. Reaction of the basic system at 30 °C (second order kinetic model)...
Fig. 6. Arrhenius plot for the second order reaction model (basic system)... Fig. 6. Arrhenius plot for the second order reaction model (basic system)...
As previously discussed, Harrison and Thode (1958) invoked a two-step model to account for the range of isotopic fractionation encountered during sulfate reduction by D. desulfuricans. Rees (1973) developed a steady-state multi-step model for isotope fractionation during bacterial reduction. His approach differed from previous attempts in that he included the possibility of zero-order kinetics for describing the uptake of sulfate. His reaction scheme is basically of the form... [Pg.330]

The basic assumption of the second-order modeling approach is that there exists at least two types of retention sites for heavy metal on soil matrix surfaces. Moreover, the primary difference between these two types of sites is based on the rate of the proposed kinetic retention reactions. Furthermore, the retention mechanisms are site specific where the rate of reaction is a function of not only the solute concentration present in the soil solution phase but also the amount of available retention sites on matrix surfaces. [Pg.193]

Both the exciton/radical pair equilibrium model and the bipartite model predict formally the same kinetics and thus both give rise also to a biexponential fluorescence decay. However, the two models are fundamentally different. This difference consists in the entirely different meaning of the rate constants involved and thus in the entirely different origin of the two observed lifetimes. In the bipartite model the biexponentiality is due to the equilibration of the excitons between antenna and reaction center. Thus one of the lifetime components reflects an eneigy transfer process. In contrast to the exciton/radical pair equilibrium model the bipartite model basically describes a diffusion-limited kinetics. Despite the fact that it formaUy can describe correctly the observed kinetics, the application of the bipartite model on experimental data leads to physically unreasonable results. First it results in a charge separation time in the reaction centers which is by one to two orders of magnitude too high. [Pg.1183]

Alternate Formal Graph The possibility to model a reactive species or a chemical reaction in the physical chemical energy variety is restricted to first-order reactions. Higher-order reactions require another energy variety especially devoted to the modeling of any kind of reaction called chemical reaction energy. The state variables in this energy variety are the reaction extent as basic quantity, the affinity JA as effort, and the reaction rate V as fiow. [Pg.89]

The closeness of fit may be gauged from the experimental and theoretical rate vs. concentration curves for hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl carboxylates catalysed by quaternary ammonium surfactant micelles (Figure 3). The shape of the curve is satisfactorily explained for unimolecular, bimolecular, and termolecular reactions. An alternative speculative model is effectively superseded by this work. Romsted s approach has been extended in a set of model calculations relating to salt and buffer effects on ion-binding, acid-dissociation equilibria, reactions of weakly basic nucleophiles, first-order reactions of ionic substrates in micelles, and second-order reactions of ionic nucleophiles with neutral substrates. In like manner the reaction between hydroxide ion and p-nitrophenyl acetate has been quantitatively analysed for unbuffered cetyltrimethylammonium bromide solutions. This permits the derivation of a mieellar rate constant km = 6-5 m s compared to the bulk rate constant of kaq =10.9m s . The equilibrium constant for ion-exchange at the surface of the micelle Xm(Br was estimated as 40 10. The... [Pg.194]

Basically, there are two forms of kinetic expressions (or models) describing the cure reactions of thermosets empirical and mechanistic models. An empirical model assumes an overall reaction order and is fit to experimental data to determine numerical values of the parameters appearing in the model. Such empirical models cannot provide information on the mechanism(s) of reaction kinetics. Different research groups. [Pg.652]

The experimental studies of a large number of low-temperature solid-phase reactions undertaken by many groups in 70s and 80s have confirmed the two basic consequences of the Goldanskii model, the existence of the low-temperature limit and the cross-over temperature. The aforementioned difference between quantum-chemical and classical reactions has also been established, namely, the values of k turned out to vary over many orders of magnitude even for reactions with similar values of Vq and hence with similar Arrhenius dependence. For illustration, fig. 1 presents a number of typical experimental examples of k T) dependence. [Pg.5]

More complicated reactions schemes, including first-order reversible consecutive processes and competitive consecutive reactions, are considered in a textbook by Irwin [89]. Professor Irwin s textbook also includes computer programs written in the BASIC language. These programs can be used to fit data to the models described. [Pg.157]

In order to correlate this model reaction with physicochemical techniques, 2,6-dimethylpyridine and carbon dioxide adsorption followed by Infrared spectroscopy [2-4] which are generally used to respectively characterize the acidity and the basicity of aluminas were also undertaken. [Pg.221]

The system illustrated by (272) forms the basis of a model for the zinc-containing metalloenzyme, carbonic anhydrase (Tabushi Kuroda, 1984). It contains Zn(n) bound to imidazole groups at the end of a hydrophobic pocket, as well as basic (amine) groups which are favourably placed to interact with a substrate carbon dioxide molecule. These are both features for the natural enzyme whose function is to catalyze the reversible hydration of carbon dioxide. The synthetic system is able to mimic the action of the enzyme (although side reactions also occur). Nevertheless, the formation of bicarbonate is still many orders of magnitude slower than occurs for the enzyme. [Pg.172]

Kunii and Levenspiel(1991, pp. 294-298) extend the bubbling-bed model to networks of first-order reactions and generate rather complex algebraic relations for the net reaction rates along various pathways. As an alternative, we focus on the development of the basic design equations, which can also be adapted for nonlinear kinetics, and numerical solution of the resulting system of algebraic and ordinary differential equations (with the E-Z Solve software). This is illustrated in Example 23-4 below. [Pg.590]

In order to demonstrate the use of laser flash photolysis in elucidation of the MDI based polyurethane photolysis mechanism, three polyurethanes, two aryl biscarbamate models, an aryl monocarbamate model, and an aromatic amine were selected. Two of the polyurethanes are based on MDI while the third is based on TDI (mixture of 2,4 and 2,6 isomers in 80/20 ratio). The MDI based polyurethanes all have the same basic carbamate repeat unit. The MDI elastomer (MDI-PUE) is soluble in tetrahydrofuran (THF). The simple polyurethane (MDI-PU) based on MDI and 1,4-butanediol is used in the tert-butoxy abstraction reactions since it does not contain a polyether backbone. (See page 47 for structures of polymers and models.)... [Pg.46]


See other pages where Reaction-order model, basic is mentioned: [Pg.66]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.674]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.168]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.96 ]




SEARCH



Basic reactions

Model 5 order

© 2024 chempedia.info