Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reaction diffusion estimation

The reaction between nitroxides and carbon-centered radicals occurs at near (but not at) diffusion controlled rates. Rate constants and Arrhenius parameters for coupling of nitroxides and various carbon-centered radicals have been determined.508 311 The rate constants (20 °C) for the reaction of TEMPO with primary, secondary and tertiary alkyl and benzyl radicals are 1.2, 1.0, 0.8 and 0.5x109 M 1 s 1 respectively. The corresponding rate constants for reaction of 115 are slightly higher. If due allowance is made for the afore-mentioned sensitivity to radical structure510 and some dependence on reaction conditions,511 the reaction can be applied as a clock reaction to estimate rate constants for reactions between carbon-centered radicals and monomers504 506"07312 or other substrates.20... [Pg.138]

One of the calculation results for the bulk copolyroerization of methyl methacrylate and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate at 70 C is shown in Figure 4. Parameters used for these calculations are shown in Table 1. An empirical correlation of kinetic parameters which accounts for diffusion controlled reactions was estimated from the time-conversion curve which is shown in Figure 5. This kind of correlation is necessary even when one uses statistical methods after Flory and others in order to evaluate the primary chain length drift. [Pg.251]

Historically, it dates from the early 1920 s. Indeed, in 1924 U.R. Evans proposed an equation showing the comparative influence of chemical and physical phenomena on the growth rate of a chemical compound layer. Unfortunately, its importance for understanding the essence of the process of reaction diffusion was not estimated properly at that time. Moreover, even now many researchers, especially physicists and metallurgists, tend to underestimate its significance. [Pg.310]

After the kinetic model for the network is defined, a simulation method needs to be chosen, given the systemic phenomenon of interest. The phenomenon might be spatial. Then it has to be decided whether in addition stochasticity plays a role or not. In the former case the kinetic model should be described with a reaction-diffusion master equation [81], whereas in the latter case partial differential equations should suffice. If the phenomenon does not involve a spatial organization, the dynamics can be simulated either using ordinary differential equations [47] or master equations [82-84]. In the latter case but not in the former, stochasticity is considered of importance. A first-order estimate of the magnitude of stochastic fluctuations can be obtained using the linear noise approximation, given only the ordinary differential equation description of the kinetic model [83-85, 87]. [Pg.409]

In the very late stages of the polymerization, as the reaction mixture becomes too viscous for polymeric radicals to move, the radical center can only move by addition of monomer molecules via a propagation reaction. The so-called reaction diffusion controlled kt at this stage can be estimated by the equation proposed by Stickler et al. [41], and it is considered to be proportional to the rate constant of propagation and monomer concentration. [Pg.99]

Even if rate measurements in sediments are made using whole core incubations, e.g., when the inhibitor is a gas, it is still difficult to obtain a depth distribution of the rate (usually, an areal rate is obtained). A sophisticated measurement and model based system that avoids direct rate measurements has been used to overcome this problem. Microelectrodes, which have very high vertical resolution, are used to measure the fine scale distribution of oxygen and NOs" in freshwater sediments. By assuming that the observed vertical gradients represent a steady state condition, reaction-diffusion models can then be used to estimate the rates of nitrification, denitrification and aerobic respiration and to compute the location of the rate processes in relation to the chemical profiles (e.g., Binnerup et ai, 1992 Jensen et ai, 1994 Meyer et ai, 2001 Rysgaard et ai, 1994). Recent advances and details of the microelectrode approach can be found in the Chapter by Joye and Anderson (this volume). [Pg.219]

Sedimentary denitrification rates have been estimated from measured pore-water solute profiles using diagenetic models, determined direcdy via sediment incubation both on deck and in situ, and determined from N-incubation techniques. Sedimentary diagenetic process can be thought of as a simple reaction—diffusion-transport system (Berner, 1980 Boudreau, 1997). In a simple fine-grained sediment system, transport is via molecular diffusion and the diagenetic equation describing this system can be expressed as ... [Pg.281]

We call the values of k and n the intrinsic rate constant and reaction order to distinguish them from what we may estimate from data. The typical experiment is to change the value of ca in the bulk fluid, measure the rate n as a function of ca, and then find the values of the parameters k and n that best fit the measurements. We explain this procedure in much more detail in Chapter 9. Here we show only that one should exercise caution with this estimation if we are measuring the rates with a solid catalyst. The effects of reaction, diffusion and external mass transfer may all manifest themselves in the measured rate. We express the reaction rate as... [Pg.210]

The ratio of the mean effective diffusion coefficient when reactions occur, Dgff, to the diffusion coefficient when there is no reaction, is estimated using the Jefferson-Witzell-... [Pg.67]

The apparent diffusion coefficient, Da in Eq. (11) is a mole fraction-weighted average of the probe diffusion coefficient in the continuous phase and the microemulsion (or micelle) diffusion coefficient. It replaces D in the current-concentration relationships where total probe concentration is used. Both the zero-kinetics and fast-kinetics expressions require knowledge of the partition coefficient and the continuous-phase diffusion coefficient for the probe. Texter et al. [57] showed that finite exchange kinetics for electroactive probes results in zero-kinetics estimates of partitioning equilibrium constants that are lower bounds to the actual equilibrium constants. The fast-kinetics limit and Eq. (11) have generally been considered as a consequence of a local equilibrium assumption. This use is more or less axiomatic, since existing analytical derivations of effective diffusion coefficients from reaction-diffusion equations are approximate. [Pg.662]

The proofs of Theorems 10.2, 10.3, and 10.4 are found in [348]. Equation (10.17) is of particular interest. Near the Takens-Bogdanov point, the frequency of the limit-cycle oscillations along the line of Hopf bifurcations, a = 0, is given by >h = see above. On the line of saddle-node bifurcations we have Aj = 0. An equation like (10.17) is expected from simple dimensional arguments. The only intrinsic length scales in reaction-diffusion systems come from the diffusion coefficients. The inverse time is determined by the rate coefficients of the reaction kinetics. Thus (10.17) provides an estimate of the intrinsic length of the Turing pattern near a double-zero point ... [Pg.292]

Taking into account this estimation, Ostrovskii and Bukhavtsova [8] have considered the simplified model of reaction/diffusion in catalyst particle under capillary condensation. According to Equation (23.7), we can suppose that diffusion limitation inside the globule (Figure 23.1) is negligible, even in the case where it is filled with liquid. Then the diffusion/reaction equation has the form... [Pg.608]

The subscripts SD, TD and RD refer to segmental diffusion, translational diffusion and reaction diffusion, with fct sD set to the low conversion values summarized in Table 3.2. The reaction diffusion term kt,RD is proportional to propagation, with proportionality coefficient Crd estimated from experimental data [10] ... [Pg.146]

The equation above is the Fokker-Planck equation to estimate the evolution of the probability density in space. Various forms of the Fokker-Planck equations result from various expressions of the work done on the systems, and are used in diverse applications, such as reaction diffusion and polymer solutions (Rubi, 2008 Bedeaux et al., 2010 Rubi and Perez-Madrid, 2001). A process may lead to variations in the conformation of the macromolecules that can be described by nonequilibrium thermodynamics. The extension of this approach to the mesoscopic level is called the mesoscopic nonequilibrium thermodynamics, and applied to transport and relaxation phenomena and polymer solutions (Santamaria-Holek and Rubi, 2003). [Pg.713]

Adaptive computations of nonlinear systems of reaction-diffusion equations play an increasingly important role in dynamical process simulation. The efficient adaptation of the spatial and temporal discretization is often the only way to get relevant solutions of the underlying mathematical models. The corresponding methods are essentially based on a posteriori estimates of the discretization errors. Once these errors have been computed, we are able to control time and space grids with respect to required tolerances and necessary computational work. Furthermore, the permanent assessment of the solution process allows us to clearly distinguish between numerical and modelling errors - a fact which becomes more and more important. [Pg.136]

Porous glasses in the shape of beads and ultrathin membranes with comparable texture properties are an ideal model system to investigate the transport characteristics of the mesopores inside the primary particles of silica supports. The hydrogenation of benzene over a nickel catalyst based on the porous glass beads is a suitable test reaction to estimate the effective diffusivities. The tortuosity factors can be obtcdned from measurements of the permeability of membranes with comparable texture properties. Now, the pore diffusivity of benzene under reaction conditions can be calculated. The low absolute values of the pore diffusivities obtained in this study indicate that interactions between the difiusing reactant and the surface of the support or pore roughness effects have to be considered. [Pg.462]

Diffusivities in biofilms have been estimated by measuring transient or steady-state fluxes through biofilms in diffusion chambers or in uptake experiments (Libicki et al. 1988). If the experiments are performed with a nonreacting compound or with killed biofilms, Deff can be calculated by fitting the measured fluxes with a diffusion model. In the case of a reacting compound, a reaction-diffusion model is necessary. [Pg.356]

At one place in the apparatus, where the pressure is 1 std atm abs and the temperature 200 C. the analysis of the bulk gas is 33.33% NHj (A), 16.67% N2 (B), and 50.00% (Q by volume. The circumstances are such that NH3 diffuses from the bulk-gas stream to the catafyst surface, and the products of the reaction diffuse back, as if by molecular diffusion through a gas film in laminar flow 1 mm thick. Estimate the local rate of cracking, kg NH3/(m catalyst surface) > s, which mi t be considered to occur if the reaction is diffusion-controlled (chemical reaction rate very rapid) with the concentration of NH3 at the catalyst surface equal to zero. [Pg.44]

At conversions well above o)p 0.8, the value of kp corresponds to that found in the absence of chemical kinetics control The reaction diffusion constant [44] is denoted by kp.rd and may be estimated from the Smoluchowski expression [45]... [Pg.149]


See other pages where Reaction diffusion estimation is mentioned: [Pg.170]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.718]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.627]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.241]   


SEARCH



Diffusion Estimation

Diffusion reactions

Diffusivity estimation

Diffusivity reactions

Reaction estimation

© 2024 chempedia.info