Reactant-modifier interactions

The study of the role of surface hydrogen concentration and that of the OH group of cinchonidine indicates, that (i) the nature of enantiodifferentiation in the hydrogenation of trifluoromethyl ketones and a-ketoesters is partly different, and (ii) concerning the reactant-modifier interaction there are important differences also among the various trifluoromethyl ketones. 

In the case of asymmetric catalysis, adsorption of the reactant A) together with the modifier leads to reactant-modifier interactions, which are assumed to be essential for transferring the chirality to a prochiral reactant. The site requirement for the substrate-modifier complex might be higher than the sum of the sites occupied by the reactant and the modifier separately 4. Am + Mp +f AM mpf) ... 

One of the oldest mechanisms of interaction between adsorbed reactant and adsorbed TA has been proposed by Klabunovskii and Petrov [212], They suggested that the reactant adsorbs stere-oselectively onto the modified catalyst surface. The subsequent surface reaction is itself nonstere-ospecific. Therefore, the optically active product is a result of the initial stereoselective adsorption of the reactant, which in turn, is a consequence of the interactions between reactant, modifier, and catalyst. The entities form an intermediate chelate complex where reactant and modifier are bound to the same surface atom (Scheme 14.4). The orientation of the reactant in such a complex is determined by the most stable configuration of the overall complex intermediate. The mechanism predicts that OY only depends on the relative concentrations of keto and enol forms of the reactant,... 

To summarize, the enhancement in regioselectivity, due to the small amount of modifier added, was interrelated with the enantioselectivity (cjf) and can be most plausibly explained by similar interactions on the catalyst surface which are responsible for the enantiodifferentiation. The substrate-modifier interaction on the catalyst surface coupled with the coverage dependent adsorption modes of the modifier and reactant explain the enhancement of rs as well as es and their dependence on modifier concentration. In the light of presented data it is evident that one needs to incorporate the coverage dependent adsorption modes in the kinetic model for a correct description of the rs and es, otherwise the maximum in selec-tivities and selectivity dependence on modifier concentration caiuiot be described. 

C0(ads)+0(ads)— C02(ads)+, 4.C02(ads) — C02(gas)+. The probabilities of steps 1 and 2 are between 0 and 1, while probabilities of other steps are P(3) = 1, P 4) = 1, P(-l)= 0 P(-2)= 0, P(-4)=0. The ZGB-model shows the effect of heterogeneity in the adlayer because of the infinitely fast formation of C02, there is a segregation of the reactants in CO and oxygen islands. The original model has later been extended and modified by numerous people to include desorption of the reactants, diffusion, an Eley Rideal mechanism for the oxidation step, physisorption of the reactants, lateral interactions, an oxidation step with a finite rate constant, surface reconstruction and additional poisoning adsorbates. 

Cinchonidine, being a bulky molecule, reduces the accessible active platinum surface as it adsorbs and should causes some deactivation with respect to racemic hydrogenation. The decrease in formation rate of the main product after the maximum can be a result of poisoning by adsorbed spectator species, which inhibit enantiodifferentiating substrate-modifier interaction. Adsorbed cinchonidine in parallel mode (active form) provides an enantioselective site (Figure 7.8) and when the reactant is adsorbed in the vicinity, interaction between reactant and modifier leads to such orientation that hydrogenation towards the main product (e.g. B or 1-R enantiomer) is preferred. However, when the tilted form (Figure 7.8) of... 

Furthermore, a modifier may alter the electronic nature of the electrode. By changing the electric field at the surface, a modifier may affect the reactant-substrate interactions. A change in reactant-substrate interactions may be manifested, for instance, in a change in molecular orientation of the reactant molecule adsorbed on the surface. Clear evidence does exist for the influence of surface electronic properties on catalytic reactions. It is apparent that a modifier which acts duough an electronic effect could influence both reaction kinetics and the tendency to poison. 

The effect of alkali presence on the adsorption of oxygen on metal surfaces has been extensively studied in the literature, as alkali promoters are used in catalytic reactions of technological interest where oxygen participates either directly as a reactant (e.g. ethylene epoxidation on silver) or as an intermediate (e.g. NO+CO reaction in automotive exhaust catalytic converters). A large number of model studies has addressed the oxygen interaction with alkali modified single crystal surfaces of Ag, Cu, Pt, Pd, Ni, Ru, Fe, Mo, W and Au.6... 

Theoretical studies aimed at rationalizing the interaction between the chiral modifier and the pyruvate have been undertaken using quantum chemistry techniques, at both ab initio and semi-empirical levels, and molecular mechanics. The studies were based on the experimental observation that the quinuclidine nitrogen is the main interaction center between cinchonidine and the reactant pyruvate. This center can either act as a nucleophile or after protonation (protic solvent) as an electrophile. In a first step, NH3 and NH4 have been used as models of this reaction center, and the optimal structures and complexation energies of the pyruvate with NH3 and NHa, respectively, were calculated [40]. The pyruvate—NHa complex was found to be much more stable (by 25 kcal/mol) due to favorable electrostatic interaction, indicating that in acidic solvents the protonated cinchonidine will interact with the pyruvate. 

The present review deals with the same topic as the articles cited above, but modified with different parameters influencing biocatalysis and reactant partition in water-organic two-liquid phase bioreactors. Interactions between these phenomena are also discussed. 

However, in the two-phase system described here the reaction progress has an influence on substrate transfer [Eq. (9)] and steady-state changes continually during the evolution of the system. Interaction between the reactant transfer and lipoxygenase-catalyzed reaction is therefore studied in octane-aqueous biphasic medium (modified Lewis cell). 

Solvents regularly used in organic reactions are used in heterogeneous catalysis of organic reactions. When solvent information is known, it accompanies other reaction information in each chapter. It must be remembered, however, that the solvent may interact with the catalyst surface and be converted into something undesirable or may combine with or modify one or more of the reactants. The example in Table 1.351 shows the rather minor effect of solvents on the stereochemistry of hydrogenation of the exo double bond in a spatane precursor. 

Reactions in solution proceed in a similar manner, by elementary steps, to those in the gas phase. Many of the concepts, such as reaction coordinates and energy barriers, are the same. The two theories for elementary reactions have also been extended to liquid-phase reactions. The TST naturally extends to the liquid phase, since the transition state is treated as a thermodynamic entity. Features not present in gas-phase reactions, such as solvent effects and activity coefficients of ionic species in polar media, are treated as for stable species. Molecules in a liquid are in an almost constant state of collision so that the collision-based rate theories require modification to be used quantitatively. The energy distributions in the jostling motion in a liquid are similar to those in gas-phase collisions, but any reaction trajectory is modified by interaction with neighboring molecules. Furthermore, the frequency with which reaction partners approach each other is governed by diffusion rather than by random collisions, and, once together, multiple encounters between a reactant pair occur in this molecular traffic jam. This can modify the rate constants for individual reaction steps significantly. Thus, several aspects of reaction in a condensed phase differ from those in the gas phase ... 

Sachtler [195] proposed a dual-site mechanism in which the hydrogen is dissociated on the Ni surface and then migrates to the substrate that is coordinated to the adsorbed dimeric nickel tartrate species. In their model, adsorption of modifier and reactants takes place on different surface atoms in contrast to Klabunovskii s proposal. Adsorbed modifier and reactant are presumed to interact through hydrogen bonding (Scheme 14.5). The unique orientation of adsorbed modifier molecules leads to a sterically favored adsorbed reactant configuration to achieve this bonding. 

A striking feature of the template model is the restriction of the role of the modifier to that of a template, which does not take into account direct binding interactions of the reactant with the modifier. Furthermore, there exists no experimental evidences for the formation of ordered arrays of cinchona molecules on a platinum surface. In 1995, Margitfalvi and Hegedus [235] criticized this model showing that the model is too idealistic and oversimplified. 

---