Random Fractional Flow Rates

The deterministic model with random fractional flow rates may be conceived on the basis of a deterministic transfer mechanism. In this formulation, a given replicate of the experiment is based on a particular realization of the random fractional flow rates and/or initial amounts 0. Once the realization is determined, the behavior of the system is deterministic. In principle, to obtain from the assumed distribution of 0 the distribution of jt (/,), i = 1. m, the common approach is to use the classical procedures for transformation of variables. When the model is expressed by a system of differential equations, the solution can be obtained through the theory of random differential equations [312-314]. 

---

Besides the deterministic context, the predicted amount of material is subjected now to a variability expressed by the second equation. This expresses the random character of the fractional flow rate, and it is known as process uncertainty. Extensive discussion of these aspects will be given in Chapter 9. 

The dynamic holdup depends mainly on the particle size and the flow rate and physical properties of the liquid. For laminar flow, the average film thickness is predicted to vary with, as in flow down a wetted-wall column or an inclined plane. In experiments with water in a string-of-spheres column, where the entire surface was wetted, the holdup did agree with theory [28]. For randomly packed beds, the dynamic holdup usually varies with a fractional power of the flow rate, but the reported exponents range from 0.3 to 0.8, and occasionally agreement with the 1/3 power predicted by theory may be fortuitous. 

Figure 10.12 shows the mass flow rate and the vapour quality as functions of the volume fraction a. It is clear that the initial mass flow rate depends strongly on the volume fraction of vapour. This is a stochastic variable, since the vessel is filled and emptied, and the leak occurs at a random point in time. 

Certainly, the hydraulic capacity limit of a packed bed has been reached when the rate of increase of pressure drop with gas flow rate approaches infinity. Likewise, the hydraulic capacity limit of a packed bed has been reached when the liquid holdup volume increases with gas flow rate to approach the void fraction of the bed. It has been demonstrated experimentally that both of the above phenomena occur at substantially the same gas rates in a bed of random dumped packing [10]. 

For a more severe test of the order, we measured a random series of 70 para to ortho conversions, with feeds ranging from 56 to 97 per cent parahydrogen, and with conversion intervals ranging from 24 to 98 per cent of complete conversion. All of these were with the same catalyst and in the same 1/4 inch OD converter as for the data discussed above. Pressure was held constant at 52,2 psia. We did not attempt to hold a fixed parahydrogen fraction in the feed for a series of flow rates, so each evaluation of the first order rate constant was based on a single conversion interval. These individually determined values of the rate constant ranged from 180 to 260 min l, showing a total spread equal to about 35 per cent of their mean value, ... 

Select a new case in Hysys. For Components, select ethanol and water for Fluid Package, select Non-Random Two Liquid (activity coefficient model), NRTL, and then enter the simulation environment. From the object palette, select Mixer and place it in the PFD area. Create two in let streams and connect one exit stream. Click on stream 1 and enter 25°C for temperature, 5 atm for pressure, and 100 kmol/h for molar flow rate. In the composition page enter the value 0.2 for ethanol and 0.8 for water. Click on stream S2 and enter 25°C for temperature and 5 atm for pressure to ensure that both the ethanol and water are in the liquid phase, and 100 kmol/h for molar flow rate. In the composition page, enter 0.4 for ethanol and 0.6 mole fraction for water. To display the result below the process flow sheet, right click on each stream and select the show table, double click on each table and click on Add Variable, select the component mole fraction and click on Add Variable for both ethanol and water. Remove units and label for stream 2 and remove labels for stream 3. Results should appear like that shown in Figure 3.2. 

The molecule decomposes by elimination of CF, which should occur with equal probabilities from each ring when energy is randomized. However, at pressures in excess of 100 Torr there is a measurable increase in the fraction of decomposition in the ring that was initially excited. From an analysis of the relative product yield versus pressure, it was deduced that energy flows between the two cyclopropyl rings with a rate of only 3x10 s In a related set of experiments Rabinovitch et al [116] studied the series of chemically activated fliioroalkyl cyclopropanes ... 

This response time should be compared to the turbulent eddy lifetime to estimate whether the drops will follow the turbulent flow. The timescale for the large turbulent eddies can be estimated from the turbulent kinetic energy k and the rate of dissipation e, Xc = 30-50 ms, for most chemical reactors. The Stokes number is an estimation of the effect of external flow on the particle movement, St = r /tc. If the Stokes number is above 1, the particles will have some random movement that increases the probability for coalescence. If St 1, the drops move with the turbulent eddies, and the rates of collisions and coalescence are very small. Coalescence will mainly be seen in shear layers at a high volume fraction of the dispersed phase. 

For fast equilibrium chemistry (Section 5.4), an equilibrium assumption allowed us to write the concentration of all chemical species in terms of the mixture-fraction vector c(x, t) = ceq( (x, 0). For a turbulent flow, it is important to note that the local micromixing rate (i.e., the instantaneous scalar dissipation rate) is a random variable. Thus, while the chemistry may be fast relative to the mean micromixing rate, at some points in a turbulent flow the instantaneous micromixing rate may be fast compared with the chemistry. This is made all the more important by the fact that fast reactions often take place in thin reaction-diffusion zones whose size may be smaller than the Kolmogorov scale. Hence, the local strain rate (micromixing rate) seen by the reaction surface may be as high as the local Kolmogorov-scale strain rate. 

The orientation of the lamella tends to be along the direction of heat flow. In polycrystalline grains solidified from a melt of eutectic composition, the orientation is more or less random but the spacing of the lamella is indicative of the rate the material was solidified. However, if a eutectic composition is directionally solidified, the lamella will be aligned along the solidification direction to form what is known as an in situ composite. If the eutectic system happens to be a low volume fraction eutectic (the eutectic composition is such that A B or vice versa), the minority phase will form a rod-like structure rather than the lamella structure described above. The spacing of the rods will still be governed by the... 

---