Radial force variation

Radial force variation Summation of the radial first, second, third, etc., harmonic. It is the change in radial force as the tire is rotated. Radial force variation will cause the vehicle to have a rough ride (as if on a poor surfaced road). 

Uniformity Measure of the tire s ability to run smoothly and vibration free sometimes measured as tire balance, radial force variation, or lateral force variation. 

We note first that the radial force constants are quite large and only qualitatively follow the d trend that would correspond to the d bulk modulus variation discussed in Chapter 7. There is a weak tendency for Cq to decrease both with mctallicity and with polarity. 

Harmonic Periodic or rhythmic force variations occurring in a sinusoidal manner around a tire. One phase is described as the first harmonic. When two phases are noted, it is described as a second harmonic. Lateral force variation first harmonic is typically due to a tread splice. Radial harmonic may be due to irregular placement of the belt layup. 

Statistical sampling of tires for durability testing, uniformity, and dynamic balancing this testing includes many of the development tests reviewed earlier such as conicity, radial runout, and lateral force variation. 

The variation of the shear stress rrx with radial coordinate r can be determined by making a force balance similar to that in Example 1.7 but using an element extending from the centre-line to a general radial distance r. 

Typical forms of the radial distribution function are shown in Fig. 38 for a liquid of hard core and of Lennard—Jones spheres (using the Percus— Yevick approximation) [447, 449] and Fig. 44 for carbon tetrachloride [452a]. Significant departures from unity are evident over considerable distances. The successive maxima and minima in g(r) correspond to essentially contact packing, but with small-scale orientational variation and to significant voids or large-scale orientational variation in the liquid structure, respectively. Such factors influence the relative location of reactants within a solvent and make the incorporation of the potential of mean force a necessity. 

The probability of fusion is a sensitive function of the product of the atomic numbers of the colliding ions. The abrupt decline of the fusion cross section as the Coulomb force between the ions increases is due to the emergence of the deep inelastic reaction mechanism. This decline and other features of the fusion cross section can be explained in terms of the potential between the colliding ions. This potential consists of three contributions, the Coulomb potential, the nuclear potential, and the centrifugal potential. The variation of this potential as a function of the angular momentum l and radial separation is shown as Figure 10.26. 

The absolute values of the dimensionless velocity vary between 1 and 0. The minus sign in the figure indicates that the velocities are in opposite directions. Figure 1.8 also shows the variation of pressure along the radial direction. The velocity profiles in the x direction shown in this figure are different from those based on the theoretical model in Fig. 1.5. This is because the experimental profiles in the jet are affected by the drag forces of the stagnant atmosphere. 

Inspection of Eq. 7 reveals that the molecular interference function, s(x), can be derived from the ratio of the total cross-section to the fitted IAM function, when the first square bracketed factor has been accounted for. A widely used model of the liquid state assumes that the molecules in liquids and amorphous materials may be described by a hard-sphere (HS) radial distribution function (RDF). This correctly predicts the exclusion property of the intermolecular force at intermolecular separations below some critical dimension, identified with the sphere diameter in the HS model. The packing fraction, 17, is proportional for a monatomic species to the bulk density, p. The variation of r(x) on 17 is reproduced in Fig. 14, taken from the work of Pavlyukhin [29],... 

In Fig. 70, Rate of increase in temperature and Radial temperature difference denote the variation of the ihermoelectroniotive force of the thermocouple 2, /.e, the variation of the r,.q,/,w , with time and the variation of the value of Trad with lime, respectively. 

Figure 7 Spatial dependence of optical force on an absorbing particle The radial and axial variation of the optical force is shown for both a TEMoo Gaussian beam and an LG03 Laguerre-Gaussian beam. Both beams have the same power (1 mW), spot size (2 urn) and wavenumber (free space wavelength 632.8 nm). The particle has a circular cross-section of radius 1 pm. Due to the cylindrical symmetry, there is no azimuthal variation of the force. The beam is propagating in the +z direction, with the beam waist at z = 0.

Two-dimensional, axisymmetric and three-dimensional simulations are conducted that mimic the experiments by forcing the wafer Cu concentration to zero across the same exposed areas. The one-dimensional model is independent of radial variations, and so it is not considered here. Table (3) compares the model predictions of k with experimental values for the 2cm circle test wafer. The two-dimensional model shows poor agreement with the data for the no rotation case. The impinging jet flows near the center of the wafer enhance the mass transfer in this region, and the two-dimensional model is incapable of capturing these effects. However, as wafer rotation effects dominate, two-... 

The coefficient Xi is a correlation function that describes the rate of increase of the effective thermal conductivity with flow velocity, Pe is the P6clet number, which describes the contribution of forced convection relative to hydrogen heat conduction, is the velocity at the centerline of the bed, ave is the average velocity, fir) describes the radial variation in dispersion, and... 

---