Quiescent solutions

Explain clearly the reason for the peaked response of linear sweep voltammetric experiments involving a planar macrodisk electrode and a quiescent solution. 

Figure 17.17 Schematic representation of a single-compartment glucose/02 enzyme fuel cell built from carbon fiber electrodes modified with Os -containing polymers that incorporate glucose oxidase at the anode and bilirubin oxidase at the cathode. The inset shows power density versus cell potential curves for this fuel cell operating in a quiescent solution in air at pH 7.2, 0.14 M NaCl, 20 mM phosphate, and 15 mM glucose. Parts of this figure are reprinted with permission from Mano et al. [2003]. Copyright (2003) American Chemical Society.

Polymerisations in hexane. The study of the reaction in hexane at low temperatures showed that it would not proceed in the absence of moisture [22, 28], and this was one of the observations which lead to the discovery of co-catalysis. The rates and DPs obtained when moist air was blown into a quiescent solution of isobutene and titanium tetrachloride in hexane were not very reproducible, and the reaction curves were S-shaped. Both the initial and maximum rates increased with increasing temperature [9], with ER = 8 1 kcal/mole. The DP increased with decreasing temperature [22], such that EDP = -2 0.5 kcal/mole. The relatively large, positive ER was taken to represent mainly E-, which seems reasonable since micro-crystalline ice must have been involved in some way in the initiation reaction. 

Microcylindrical electrodes are easier to constract and maintain than microdisk electrodes [37]. Mass transport to a stationary cylinder in quiescent solution is governed by axisymmetrical cylindrical diffusion. For square-wave voltammetry the shape and position of the net current response are independent of the extent of cyhn-drical diffusion [38]. The experiments were performed with the ferri-ferrocyanide couple using a small platinum wire (25 pm in diameter and 0.5 -1.0 cm in length) as the working electrode [37]. 

It is further useful to measure ionic species in stirred or flowing solutions, because the electrode response is then faster, the determination limit is often better than in quiescent solutions and the measurement precision is also improved These improvements apparently result from the effect of solution movement on film diffusion at the electrode surface, which is assumed to be the response-rate determining step [92, 154], An obvious requirement is that the solution velocity and the cell geometry be constant. 

The individual polarization curves for the metals are often modified as a result of interactions resulting from codeposition. If the alloy deposition occurs at low polarization, the nobler metal will be deposited preferentially (Cu in Example 11.1). All factors, however, that increase polarization during electrodeposition, such as high current density, low temperature, and quiescent solution—factors that increase concentration polarization—will favor the deposition of the less noble metal (Zn in Example 11.1). 

Just as the fundamental equation for a potential step experiment is the Cottrell equation, for the current step it is, in quiescent solution, the Sand equation [245]... 

The important concept in these dynamic electrochemical methods is diffusion-controlled oxidation or reduction. Consider a planar electrode that is immersed in a quiescent solution containing O as the only electroactive species. This situation is illustrated in Figure 3.1 A, where the vertical axis represents concentration and the horizontal axis represents distance from the electrodesolution interface. This interface or boundary between electrode and solution is indicated by the vertical line. The dashed line is the initial concentration of O, which is homogeneous in the solution the initial concentration of R is zero. The excitation function that is impressed across the electrode-solution interface consists of a potential step from an initial value E , at which there is no current due to a redox process, to a second potential Es, as shown in Figure 3.2. The value of this second potential is such that essentially all of O at the electrode surface is instantly reduced to R as in the generalized system of Reaction 3.1 ... 

A Precautionary Note About Convective Mass Transport Great care must be taken in the design of experiments employing the techniques discussed earlier that are normally carried out in quiescent solutions, in order to avoid unintentional convective mass transport or convective stirring. This mode... 

For the deposition step, the working electrode is maintained at a potential cathodic (by at least 0.4 V) of the standard potential of the least easily reduced ion to be determined. Forced convection (via rotation, stirring, or flow) is usually used to facilitate the deposition step. Quiescent solutions may be employed in connection with ultramicroelectrodes. The deposition time required is dependent on the sample concentration, with 1- to 10-min periods usually being sufficient for measurements in the range of 10-7 M to 1 x 10 9 M. Because only a small fraction of the metal ions is deposited, it is essential that all experimental parameters be as reproducible as possible during a series of measurements. 

Quiescent Solutions. Coulometry at constant current provides a simple method for measuring the quantity of electrogenerated species as long as the reaction proceeds with 100% current efficiency. However, this condition breaks down with depletion of the electroactive material in the diffusion layer (cf. chronopotentiometric transitions see Fig. 4.3). For low values of the applied current, the thermal and density gradients supplement diffusion sufficiently to sustain electrolysis without the potential shifting to a different reaction. This mode of radical generation has been employed successfully in the study of stable species. 

Since the sensitivity of the stripping operation is dependent on the deposition time, the latter should be selected according to the concentration of the target metals (from around 2 min at the 10-8M level to 15 min for 10-9-10-1°M concentrations). The deposition step is usually facilitated by convective transport of the analyte to the surface of the working electrode. Quiescent solutions can be used in connection to ultramicroelectrodes. Only a small, and yet reproducible, fraction of the metal in the solution is being deposited (Fig. 6.1). 

V, using a potential step of 0.0024Y. Modulation time was 0.05 s and interval time of applied pulses was 0.2 s. During the stripping step the current is recorded in quiescent solution. To obtain a calibration curve a known quantity of heavy-metal solution was successively added and the above accumulation and stripping procedures were applied without the removal of the electrodes. All experiments were carried out without the removal of oxygen. 

The three electrodes GECE as working electrode, the Ag/AgCl as reference electrode and the platinum as auxiliary electrode, are immersed in a 25 ml electrochemical cell containing 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH 4.5) and 400 pg/1 of bismuth. During the stripping step, the current is recorded in quiescent solution. 

The electrochemical responses presented in this book typically consider quiescent solutions where mass transport takes place only by diffusion. As stated in Sect. 1.8, the flux of a species i by diffusion is described by Fick s first law ... 

In practice two methods are used for stationary planar electrodes in quiescent solution chronoamperometry and chronopotentiometry. By use of an electroactive species whose concentration, diffusion coefficient, and n value are known, the electrode area can be calculated from the experimental data. In chronoamperometry, the potential is stepped from a value where no reaction takes place to a value that ensures that the concentration of reactant species will be maintained at essentially zero concentration at the electrode surface. Under conditions of linear diffusion to a planar electrode the current is given by the Cottrell equation [Chapter 3, Eq. (3.6)] ... 

The model solutions discussed above were compared with experimental data collected using a laser diffraction particle size analyzer. Hematite was dispersed in solutions at various pH values and moderate ionic strength (0.02 M) such that aggregation rates varied from slow to fast, and aggregation was allowed to occur in quiescent solution. The aggregating dispersion was sampled over time, and data was represented in three dimensions as the change in particle size distributions over time. Figure 10a shows hematite... 

---