Quantum mechanics, completeness

Strange as it may seem, the key to progress towards a reliable atomic conception of matter was a very humble instrument, the balance. It was in fact through weight laws - Boyle and Lavoisier - that modern science arrived at a proper understanding of the atomic and molecular structure of matter. The discovery of the electron and quantum mechanics completed the job at the beginning of the last century. 

In classical mechanics, the state of the system may be completely specified by the set of Cartesian particle coordinates r. and velocities dr./dt at any given time. These evolve according to Newton s equations of motion. In principle, one can write down equations involving the state variables and forces acting on the particles which can be solved to give the location and velocity of each particle at any later (or earlier) time t, provided one knows the precise state of the classical system at time t. In quantum mechanics, the state of the system at time t is instead described by a well behaved mathematical fiinction of the particle coordinates q- rather than a simple list of positions and velocities. 

Up until now, little has been said about time. In classical mechanics, complete knowledge about the system at any time t suffices to predict with absolute certainty the properties of the system at any other time t. The situation is quite different in quantum mechanics, however, as it is not possible to know everything about the system at any time t. Nevertheless, the temporal behavior of a quantum-mechanical system evolves in a well defined way drat depends on the Hamiltonian operator and the wavefiinction T" according to the last postulate... 

At this point the reader may feel that we have done little in the way of explaining molecular synnnetry. All we have done is to state basic results, nonnally treated in introductory courses on quantum mechanics, connected with the fact that it is possible to find a complete set of simultaneous eigenfiinctions for two or more commuting operators. However, as we shall see in section Al.4.3.2. the fact that the molecular Hamiltonian //coimmites with and F is intimately coimected to the fact that //commutes with (or, equivalently, is invariant to) any rotation of the molecule about a space-fixed axis passing tlirough the centre of mass of the molecule. As stated above, an operation that leaves the Hamiltonian invariant is a symmetry operation of the Hamiltonian. The infinite set of all possible rotations of the... 

Note that equation (A3.11.1881 includes a quantum mechanical trace, which implies a sum over states. The states used for this evaluation are arbitrary as long as they form a complete set and many choices have been considered in recent work. Much of this work has been based on wavepackets [46] or grid point basis frmctions [47]. 

I i i(q,01 in configuration space, e.g. as defined by the possible values of the position coordinates q. This motion is given by the time evolution of the wave fiinction i(q,t), defined as die projection ( q r(t)) of the time-dependent quantum state i i(t)) on configuration space. Since the quantum state is a complete description of the system, the wave packet defining the probability density can be viewed as the quantum mechanical counterpart of the classical distribution F(q- i t), p - P t)). The time dependence is obtained by solution of the time-dependent Schrodinger equation... 

A diagrannnatic approach that can unify the theory underlymg these many spectroscopies is presented. The most complete theoretical treatment is achieved by applying statistical quantum mechanics in the fonn of the time evolution of the light/matter density operator. (It is recoimnended that anyone interested in advanced study of this topic should familiarize themselves with density operator fonnalism [8, 9, 10, H and f2]. Most books on nonlinear optics [13,14, f5,16 and 17] and nonlinear optical spectroscopy [18,19] treat this in much detail.) Once the density operator is known at any time and position within a material, its matrix in the eigenstate basis set of the constituents (usually molecules) can be detennined. The ensemble averaged electrical polarization, P, is then obtained—tlie centrepiece of all spectroscopies based on the electric component of the EM field. 

Molecular spectroscopy offers a fiindamental approach to intramolecular processes [18, 94]. The spectral analysis in temis of detailed quantum mechanical models in principle provides the complete infomiation about the wave-packet dynamics on a level of detail not easily accessible by time-resolved teclmiques. 

Now we do one of the standard quantum mechanical tricks, inserting the identity operator as a complete sum of states in the coordinate representation ... 

Altliough a complete treatment of optical phenomena generally requires a full quantum mechanical description of tire light field, many of tire devices of interest tliroughout optoelectronics can be described using tire wave properties of tire optical field. Several excellent treatments on tire quantum mechanical tlieory of tire electromagnetic field are listed in [9]. 

Extension to the multidimensional case is trivial. Wigner developed a complete mechanical system, equivalent to quantum mechanics, based on this distribution. He also showed that it satisfies many properties desired by a phase-space distribution, and in the high-temperature limit becomes the classical distribution. 

The spin in quantum mechanics was introduced because experiments indicated that individual particles are not completely identified in terms of their three spatial coordinates [87]. Here we encounter, to some extent, a similar situation A system of items (i.e., distributions of electrons) in a given point in configuration space is usually described in terms of its set of eigenfunctions. This description is incomplete because the existence of conical intersections causes the electronic manifold to be multivalued. For example, in case of two (isolated) conical intersections we may encounter at a given point m configuration space four different sets of eigenfunctions (see Section Vni). 

The problem with most quantum mechanical methods is that they scale badly. This means that, for instance, a calculation for twice as large a molecule does not require twice as much computer time and resources (this would be linear scaling), but rather 2" times as much, where n varies between about 3 for DFT calculations to 4 for Hartree-Fock and very large numbers for ab-initio techniques with explicit treatment of electron correlation. Thus, the size of the molecules that we can treat with conventional methods is limited. Linear scaling methods have been developed for ab-initio, DFT and semi-empirical methods, but only the latter are currently able to treat complete enzymes. There are two different approaches available. 

This is a question of reaction prediction. In fact, this is a deterministic system. If we knew the rules of chemistry completely, and understood chemical reactivity fully, we should be able to answer this question and to predict the outcome of a reaction. Thus, we might use quantum mechanical calculations for exploring the structure and energetics of various transition states in order to find out which reaction pathway is followed. This requires calculations of quite a high degree of sophistication. In addition, modeling the influence of solvents on... 

The book is organised so that some of the techniques discussed in later chapters refer to material discussed earlier, though I have tried to make each chapter as independent of the ofhers as possible. Some readers may therefore be pleased to know that it is not essential to completely digest the chapters on quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics in order to read about methods for searching conformational space Readers with experience in one or more areas may, of course, wish to be more selective. 

We shall examine the simplest possible molecular orbital problem, calculation of the bond energy and bond length of the hydrogen molecule ion Hj. Although of no practical significance, is of theoretical importance because the complete quantum mechanical calculation of its bond energy can be canied out by both exact and approximate methods. This pemiits comparison of the exact quantum mechanical solution with the solution obtained by various approximate techniques so that a judgment can be made as to the efficacy of the approximate methods. Exact quantum mechanical calculations cannot be carried out on more complicated molecular systems, hence the importance of the one exact molecular solution we do have. We wish to have a three-way comparison i) exact theoretical, ii) experimental, and iii) approximate theoretical. 

Besides the intrinsic usefulness of Fourier series and Fourier transforms for chemists (e.g., in FTIR spectroscopy), we have developed these ideas to illustrate a point that is important in quantum chemistry. Much of quantum chemistry is involved with basis sets and expansions. This has nothing in particular to do with quantum mechanics. Any time one is dealing with linear differential equations like those that govern light (e.g. spectroscopy) or matter (e.g. molecules), the solution can be written as linear combinations of complete sets of solutions. 

You can perform quantum mechanical calculations on a part of a molecular system, such as a solute, while using molecular mechanics for the rest of the system, such as the solvent surrounding the solute. This boundary technique is available in HyperChem for all quantum mechanical methods. It is somewhat less complete with ab initio calculations than with semi-empirical calculations, however. With ab initio calculations the boundary must occur between molecules rather than inside a molecule. 

The setup of these calculations is very similar for both quantum and molecular mechanics. In practice, molecular dynamics calculation s using the nl) initio and semi-empirical quantum mechanical SCFmethods are limited to relatively small systems. Each time step requires a complete calculation of the wave function and the forces. 

At a physical level. Equation 35 represents a mixing of all of the possible electronic states of the molecule, all of which have some probability of being attained according to the laws of quantum mechanics. Full Cl is the most complete non-relativistic treatment of the molecular system possible, within the limitations imposed by the chosen basis set. It represents the possible quantum states of the system while modelling the electron density in accordance with the definition (and constraints) of the basis set in use. For this reason, it appears in the rightmost column of the following methods chart ... 

The molecular mechanics calculations discussed so far have been concerned with predictions of the possible equilibrium geometries of molecules in vacuo and at OK. Because of the classical treatment, there is no zero-point energy (which is a pure quantum-mechanical effect), and so the molecules are completely at rest at 0 K. There are therefore two problems that I have carefully avoided. First of all, I have not treated dynamical processes. Neither have I mentioned the effect of temperature, and for that matter, how do molecules know the temperature Secondly, very few scientists are interested in isolated molecules in the gas phase. Chemical reactions usually take place in solution and so we should ask how to tackle the solvent. We will pick up these problems in future chapters. 

---