Quantum mechanics beginning

In this form the Pauli principle cannot be understood by students who have not studied quantum mechanics and its consequences for the distribution of electrons in a molecule is not apparent. Even before they take a course in quantum mechanics beginning university students are, however, introduced to the idea that the electrons in a molecule are in constant motion and that according to quantum mechanics we cannot determine the path of any one electron but only the probability of finding an electron in an infinitesimal volume surrounding any particular point in space. It can be shown that a consequence of the Pauli principle is that... 

FIGURE 10.7 The plots of I Pr illustrate the correspondence principle For large quantum numbers, quantum mechanics begins to approximate classical mechanics. At large n, the particle-in-a-box looks as if the particle were present in all regions of the box with equal probability. 

Our understanding of molecular quantum mechanics begins with molecular orbitals, which are based on atomic orbitals. As with many tools used to describe nature, we started at the bottom and are working our way up. The fundamentals of molecular quantum mechanics provide us with the tools to understand most of matter, at least as we understand it today. The next few chapters broaden the applications of quantum mechanics to molecular systems. 

Though quantum mechanical analysis can often be more complicated than classical mechanical analysis, the results offer rich understanding of the detailed basis of chemical phenomena. This chapter focuses on the development of some basic elements of quantum mechanics beginning with formal aspects of using quantum mechanical operators. It examines the treatment of certain model problems used in chemistry, and it introduces the concept of approximate solution of the Schrodinger equation. Finally, two powerful approximation techniques are considered. 

The aim of this section is to show how the modulus-phase formulation, which is the keytone of our chapter, leads very directly to the equation of continuity and to the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. These equations have formed the basic building blocks in Bohm s formulation of non-relativistic quantum mechanics [318]. We begin with the nonrelativistic case, for which the simplicity of the derivation has... 

Containsnine reviews in computational chemistry by various experts. This book is particularly useful for beginning computational chemists. Six chapters address issues relevant to HyperChem. including semi-empirical quantum mechanics... 

The term ah initio is Latin for from the beginning. This name is given to computations that are derived directly from theoretical principles with no inclusion of experimental data. This is an approximate quantum mechanical calculation. The approximations made are usually mathematical approximations, such as using a simpler functional form for a function or finding an approximate solution to a dilferential equation. 

Classical and Quantum Mechanics. At the beginning of the twentieth century, a revolution was brewing in the world of physics. For hundreds of years, the Newtonian laws of mechanics had satisfactorily provided explanations and supported experimental observations in the physical sciences. However, the experimentaUsts of the nineteenth century had begun delving into the world of matter at an atomic level. This led to unsatisfactory explanations of the observed patterns of behavior of electricity, light, and matter, and it was these inconsistencies which led Bohr, Compton, deBroghe, Einstein, Planck, and Schrn dinger to seek a new order, another level of theory, ie, quantum theory. 

The beginnings of the enormous field of solid-state physics were concisely set out in a fascinating series of recollections by some of the pioneers at a Royal Society Symposium (Mott 1980), with the participation of a number of professional historians of science, and in much greater detail in a large, impressive book by a number of historians (Hoddeson et al. 1992), dealing in depth with such histories as the roots of solid-state physics in the years before quantum mechanics, the quantum theory of metals and band theory, point defects and colour centres, magnetism, mechanical behaviour of solids, semiconductor physics and critical statistical theory. 

The traditional place to begin a quantum-mechanical study of molecules is with the hydrogen molecule ion H2+. Apart from being a prototype molecule, it reminds us that molecules consist of nuclei and electrons. We often have to be aware of the nuclear motion in order to understand the electronic ones. The two are linked. 

These days students are presented with the four quantum number description of electrons in many-electron atoms as though these quantum numbers somehow drop out of quantum mechanics in a seamless manner. In fact, they do not and furthermore they emerged, one at a time, beginning with Bohr s use of just one quantum number and culminating with Pauli s introduction of the fourth quantum number and his associated Exclusion Principle. 

The modern approach to chemical education appears to be strongly biased toward theories, particularly quantum mechanics. Many authors have remarked that classical chemistry and its invaluable predictive rules have been downgraded since chemistry was put into orbit around physics. School and undergraduate courses as well as textbooks show an increasing tendency to begin with the establishment of theoretical concepts such as orbitals and hybridization. There is a continuing debate in the chemical literature on the relative merits of theory as opposed to qualitative or descriptive chemistry 1-6). To quote the late J. J. Zucker-man who supported the latter approach (3). 

The problems which the orbital approximation raises in chemical education have been discussed elsewhere by the author (Scerri [1989], [1991]). Briefly, chemistry textbooks often fail to stress the approximate nature of atomic orbitals and imply that the solution to all difficult chemical problems ultimately lies in quantum mechanics. There has been an increassing tendency for chemical education to be biased towards theories, particularly quantum mechanics. Textbooks show a growing tendency to begin with the establishment of theoretical concepts such as atomic orbitals. Only recently has a reaction begun to take place, with a call for more qualitatively based courses and texts (Zuckermann [1986]). A careful consideration of the orbital model would therefore have consequences for chemical education and would clarify the status of various approximate theories purporting to be based on quantum mechanics. 

But let me return to the question of whether the periodic table is fully and deductively explained by quantum mechanics. In the usually encountered explanation one assumes that at certain places in the periodic table unexpected orbital begins to fill as in the case of potassium and calcium where the 4s orbital begins to fill before the 3d shell has been completely filled. This information itself is not derived from first principles. It is justified post facto and by some tricky calculations (Melrose, Scerri, 1996 Vanquickenbome, Pierloot, Devoghel, 1994). 

Historical Background.—Relativistic quantum mechanics had its beginning in 1900 with Planck s formulation of the law of black body radiation. Perhaps its inception should be attributed more accurately to Einstein (1905) who ascribed to electromagnetic radiation a corpuscular character the photons. He endowed the photons with an energy and momentum hv and hv/c, respectively, if the frequency of the radiation is v. These assignments of energy and momentum for these zero rest mass particles were consistent with the postulates of relativity. It is to be noted that zero rest mass particles can only be understood within the framework of relativistic dynamics. 

In my opinion, the last qualitative change in theoretical chemistry corresponds to the introduction of computers in chemistry. A conventional date for the beginning of this last period may be indicated in the Boulder Conference of 1959 [2], i.e. more than thirty years ago. The use of more and more large and efficient computers has shifted the attention of theoretical chemists to an extensive use of quantum mechanical calculations. 

Quantum mechanics was the dominant theory in chemistry even before the advent of electronic computers. The conventional date for the beginning of this period may be fixed at 1927 with the publications of the Heitler and London paper on hydrogen molecule [3]. The growth of theoretical chemistry (or better, theoretical quantum chemistry) between 1930 and 1960 (thirty years, again, as for the last period) has followed a research programme different from that accepted in the most recent period. 

Our presentation of the basic principles of quantum mechanics is contained in the first three chapters. Chapter 1 begins with a treatment of plane waves and wave packets, which serves as background material for the subsequent discussion of the wave function for a free particle. Several experiments, which lead to a physical interpretation of the wave function, are also described. In Chapter 2, the Schrodinger differential wave equation is introduced and the wave function concept is extended to include particles in an external potential field. The formal mathematical postulates of quantum theory are presented in Chapter 3. 

However, if the molecular configuration is such as to bring the radical centers into close contact (say, to within some critical distance D), interaction will begin and the two doublet states will collapse since the spins of the two electrons are no longer independent of each other. Quantum mechanics tells us that under these conditions the total number of states is dependent upon the sum of the spin quantum numbers for the two electrons ... 

---