Quantum information adiabatic

Information about critical points on the PES is useful in building up a picture of what is important in a particular reaction. In some cases, usually themially activated processes, it may even be enough to describe the mechanism behind a reaction. However, for many real systems dynamical effects will be important, and the MEP may be misleading. This is particularly true in non-adiabatic systems, where quantum mechanical effects play a large role. For example, the spread of energies in an excited wavepacket may mean that the system finds an intersection away from the minimum energy point, and crosses there. It is for this reason that molecular dynamics is also required for a full characterization of the system of interest. 

Quantum chemical methods, exemplified by CASSCF and other MCSCF methods, have now evolved to an extent where it is possible to routinely treat accurately the excited electronic states of molecules containing a number of atoms. Mixed nuclear dynamics, such as swarm of trajectory based surface hopping or Ehrenfest dynamics, or the Gaussian wavepacket based multiple spawning method, use an approximate representation of the nuclear wavepacket based on classical trajectories. They are thus able to use the infoiination from quantum chemistry calculations required for the propagation of the nuclei in the form of forces. These methods seem able to reproduce, at least qualitatively, the dynamics of non-adiabatic systems. Test calculations have now been run using duect dynamics, and these show that even a small number of trajectories is able to produce useful mechanistic infomiation about the photochemistry of a system. In some cases it is even possible to extract some quantitative information. 

In the adiabatic bend approximation (ABA) for the same reaction,18 the three radial coordinates are explicitly treated while an adiabatic approximation was used for the three angles. These reduced dimensional studies are dynamically approximate in nature, but nevertheless can provide important information characterizing polyatomic reactions, and they have been reviewed extensively by Clary,19 and Bowman and Schatz.20 However, quantitative determination of reaction probabilities, cross-sections and thermal reaction rates, and their relation to the internal states of the reactants would require explicit treatment of five or the full six degrees-of-freedom in these four-atom reactions, which TI methods could not handle. Other approximate quantum approaches such as the negative imaginary potential method16,21 and mixed classical and quantum time-dependent method have also been used.22... 

The standard semiclassical methods are surface hopping and Ehrenfest dynamics (also known as the classical path (CP) method [197]), and they will be outlined below. More details and comparisons can be found in [30-32]. The multiple spawning method, based on Gaussian wavepacket propagation, is also outlined below. See [1] for further information on both quantum and semiclassical non-adiabatic dynamics methods. 

How well do these quantum-semiclassical methods work in describing the dynamics of non-adiabatic systems There are two sources of errors, one due to the approximations in the methods themselves, and the other due to errors in their application, for example, lack of convergence. For example, an obvious source of error in surface hopping and Ehrenfest dynamics is that coherence effects due to the phases of the nuclear wavepackets on the different surfaces are not included. This information is important for the description of short-time (few femtoseconds) quantum mechanical effects. For longer timescales, however, this loss of information should be less of a problem as dephasing washes out this information. Note that surface hopping should be run in an adiabatic representation, whereas the other methods show no preference for diabatic or adiabatic. 

Considering the practical application of the mapping approach, it is most important to note that the quantum correction can also be determined in cases where no reference calculations exist. That is, if we a priori know the long-time limit of an observable, we can use this information to determine the quantum correction. For example, a multidimensional molecular system is for large times expected to completely decay in its adiabatic ground state, that is. 

Computational spectrometry, which implies an interaction between quantum chemistry and analysis of molecular spectra to derive accurate information about molecular properties, is needed for the analysis of the pure rotational and vibration-rotational spectra of HeH in four isotopic variants to obtain precise values of equilibrium intemuclear distance and force coefficient. For this purpose, we have calculated the electronic energy, rotational and vibrational g factors, the electric dipolar moment, and adiabatic corrections for both He and H atomic centres for intemuclear distances over a large range 10 °m [0.3, 10]. Based on these results we have generated radial functions for atomic contributions for g g,... 

The leading quantum correction to the static JT energetics is given by the zero-point energy gain due to the softening of the vibrational frequency at the JT-distorted minima [5]. To obtain this information, by finite differences we compute the Hessian matrix of the second-order derivatives of the lowest adiabatic potential sheet, at one of the static JT minima Q,mn... 

Periodic orbits also explain the long-lived resonances in the photodissociation of CH.30N0(S i), for example, which we amply discussed in Chapter 7. But the existence of periodic orbits in such cases really does not come as a surprise because the potential barrier, independent of its height, stabilizes the periodic motion. If the adiabatic approximation is reasonably trustworthy the periodic orbits do not reveal any additional or new information. Finally, it is important to realize that, in general, the periodic orbits do not provide an assignment in the usual sense, i.e., labeling each peak in the spectrum by a set of quantum numbers. Because of the short lifetime of the excited complex, the stationary wavefunctions do not exhibit a distinct nodal structure as they do in truly indirect processes (see Figure 7.11 for examples). 

In previous section, by considering the electrostatic energy of the quantum dot charging we have determined the tunnel curves using the phenomenological approach. A strict definition of the tunnel curves as total electronic energy at a fixed dot location between leads is implied by the Born-Oppenheimer adiabatic strategy. For the quantum-mechanical computation of the tunnel curves, the information about (1) the spatial profile of electrostatic potential and (2) the electron and ion distributions of the SET is required as an input. 

Quantum chemical information is needed in several areas. For example repulsive potentials are missing for many pairs of atoms that have otherwise been well studied. These repulsive potentials enter in the diatomics-in-molecules approach and in dynamical models. Whenever potential surfaces cross (or pseudo-cross) we need the intersurface couplings in order to understand whether electronic motions are adiabatic or diabatic. A priori information on conformations of long-lived complexes would be helpful, because they... 

As a reflection of these properties, direct information on Tad is not required in the semi-classical analytical theory, as demonstrated in the previous section. That information is replaced by the analytical continuation of the adiabatic potentials into the complex R-plane (see Eq. (24)). In order to carry out the quantum mechanical numerical calculations, however, we always stay on the real R-axis and we require explicit information on the nonadiabatic couplings. Even in the diabatic representation, which is often employed because of its convenience, nonadiabatic couplings are necessary to obtain the diabatic couplings. The quantum mechanical calculations are usually made by solving the coupled differential equations derived from an expansion of the total wave function in terms of the electronic wave functions. 

---