Quantum electrodynamics fields

Before embarking on the problem of the interaction of the negaton-positon field with the quantized electromagnetic field, we shall first consider the case of the negaton-positon field interacting with an external, classical (prescribed) electromagnetic field. We shall also outline in the present chapter those aspects of the theory of the S-matrix that will be required for the treatment of quantum electrodynamics. Section 10.4 presents a treatment of the Dirac equation in an external field. 

Quantum Electrodynamics in the Heisenberg Picture.— With the present section we begin our discussion of the quantum theoretical description of the interaction between the negaton-positon field and the radiation field i.e., of quantum electrodynamics proper. 

Invariance Properties.—Before delving into the mathematical formulation of the invariance properties of quantum electrodynamics, let us briefly state what is meant by an invariance principle in general. As we shall be primarily concerned with the formulation of invariance principles in the Heisenberg picture, it is useful to introduce the concept of the complete description of a physical system. By this is meant at the classical level a specification of the trajectories of all particles together with a full description of all fields at all points of space for all time. The equations of motion then allow one to determine whether the system could, in fact, have evolved in the way... 

The statement that quantum electrodynamics is invariant under such a spatial inversion (parity operation) can be taken as the statement that there exist new field operators >p (x ) and A x ) expressible in terms of tji(x) and Au(x) which satisfy the same commutation rules and equations of motion in terms of s as do ift(x) and A x) written in terms of x. In fact one readily verifies that the operators... 

As indicated at the beginning of the last section, to say that quantum electrodynamics is invariant under space inversion (x = ijX) means that we can find new field operators tfi (x ),A v x ) expressible in terms of fj(x) and A nix) which satisfy the same equations of motion and commutation rules with respect to the primed coordinate system (a = igx) as did tf/(x) and Av(x) in terms of x. Since the commutation rules are to be the same for both sets of operators and the set of realizable states must be invariant, there must exist a unitary (or anti-unitary) transformation connecting these two sets of operators if the theory is invariant. For the case of space inversions, such a unitary operator is... 

Eigenstates of a crystal, 725 Eigenvalues of quantum mechanical angular momentum, 396 Electrical filter response, 180 Electrical oscillatory circuit, 380 Electric charge operator, total, 542 Electrodynamics, quantum (see Quantum electrodynamics) Electromagnetic field, quantization of, 486, 560... 

Quantization of radiation field in terms of field intensity operators, 562 Quantum electrodynamics, 642 asymptotic condition, 698 gauge invariance in relation to operators inducing inhomogeneous Lorentz transformations, 678 invariance properties, 664 invariance under discrete transformations, 679... 

Why this emphasis Schweber has portrayed Slater as a man who developed a deep feeling of both inferiority and competitiveness toward his European mentors and peers in the fields of atomic physics and quantum electrodynamics. Slater was not alone in this reaction, as Henry James made clear. Slater, like other American physicists and chemists, used his influence in Boston, New York, and Washington circles, as well as his position within his own institution, to build up American science in an area where Americans could take a competitive lead. 107 Donnan had written Lewis in 1921 that "you are making old Europe sit up some. If it wasn t for Planck, Einstein, Rutherford, and Bragg, we should be in a bad way." 108 But it was not enough for Europeans to sit up "some" they must be made to gawk. 

A systematic development of relativistic molecular Hamiltonians and various non-relativistic approximations are presented. Our starting point is the Dirac one-fermion Hamiltonian in the presence of an external electromagnetic field. The problems associated with generalizing Dirac s one-fermion theory smoothly to more than one fermion are discussed. The description of many-fermion systems within the framework of quantum electrodynamics (QED) will lead to Hamiltonians which do not suffer from the problems associated with the direct extension of Dirac s one-fermion theory to many-fermion system. An exhaustive discussion of the recent QED developments in the relevant area is not presented, except for cursory remarks for completeness. The non-relativistic form (NRF) of the many-electron relativistic Hamiltonian is developed as the working Hamiltonian. It is used to extract operators for the observables, which represent the response of a molecule to an external electromagnetic radiation field. In this study, our focus is mainly on the operators which eventually were used to calculate the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) chemical shifts and indirect nuclear spin-spin coupling constants. 

Nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics (NRQED) [11] is an attempt to combine the simplicity of the quantum mechanical description with the power and rigor of field theory. The idea is to write ordinary relativistic quantum electrodynamics in the form of a nonrelativistic expansion with a Lagrangian containing vertices with arbitrary powers of fields. This is useful if we want to consider essentially nonrelativistic processes, like nonrelativistic bound states and threshold phenomena. In such a physical situation the dominant dynamics is nonrelativistic, and the calculations could be in principle simplified if... 

Contributions to the energy which depend only on the small parameters a. and Za. are called radiative corrections. Powers of a arise only from the quantum electrodynamics loops, and all associated corrections have a quantum field theory nature. Radiative corrections do not depend on the recoil factor m/M and thus may be calculated in the framework of QED for a bound electron in an external field. In respective calculations one deals only with the complications connected with the presence of quantized fields, but the two-particle nature of the bound state and all problems connected with the description of the bound states in relativistic quantum field theory still may be ignored. 

This experimental development was matched by rapid theoretical progress, and the comparison and interplay between theory and experiment has been important in the field of metrology, leading to higher precision in the determination of the fundamental constants. We feel that now is a good time to review modern bound state theory. The theory of hydrogenic bound states is widely described in the literature. The basics of nonrelativistic theory are contained in any textbook on quantum mechanics, and the relativistic Dirac equation and the Lamb shift are discussed in any textbook on quantum electrodynamics and quantum field theory. An excellent source for the early results is the classic book by Bethe and Salpeter [6]. A number of excellent reviews contain more recent theoretical results, and a representative, but far from exhaustive, list of these reviews includes [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. 

In the previous section we presented the semi-classical electron-electron interaction we treated the electrons quantum mechanically but assumed that they interact via classical electromagnetic fields. The Breit retardation is only an approximate treatment of retardation and we shall now consider a more consistent treatment of the electron-electron interaction operator that also provides a bridge to relativistic DFT, which is current-density functional theory. For the correct description we have to take the quantization of electromagnetic fields into account (however, we will discuss only old, i.e., pre-1940 quantum electrodynamics). This means the two moving electrons interact via exchanged virtual photons with a specific angular frequency u>... 

Crowell discovered a variety of effects numerically, including modified Rabi flopping, which has an inverse frequency dependence similar to that observed in the solid state in reciprocal noise [73]. The latter is also explained by Crowell [17] using a non-Abelian model. A variety of other effects of RFR on the quantum electrodynamical level was also reported numerically [17]. The overall result is that the occurrence, classically, of the B V> field means that there is a quantum electrodynamical Hamiltonian generated by the classical term proportional to 3 2. This induces transitional behavior because it contributes to the dynamics of probability amplitudes [17]. The Hamiltonian is a quartic potential where the value of determines the value of the potential. The latter has two minima one where B = 0 and the other for a finite value of the B i) field, corresponding to states that are invariants of the Lagrangian but not of the vacuum. 

M. W. Evans and L. B. Crowell, Classical and Quantum Electrodynamics and the B Field, World Scientific, Singapore, 1999. 

In quantum electrodynamics (QED) the potentials asume a more important role in the formulation, as they are related to a phase shift in the wavefunction. This is still an integral effect over the path of interest. This manifests itself in the phase shift of an electron around a closed path enclosing a magnetic field, even though there are no fields (approximately) on the path itself (static conditions). As can be shown the result of such an experiment is gauge-invariant, allowing the use of various choices of the vector potential (all giving the same result). 

In formulating quantum electrodynamics (QED), it has been found convenient to introduce the electromagnetic interaction with charged particles via the potentials instead of the fields. Consider a particle of charge q traveling on some path P from i to 2. Then the magnetic change in phase of the wavefunction is just... 

The connection between the field and its source has always been and still is the most difficult problem in classical and quantum electrodynamics. 

---