Operators parity

Figure 8.6 Schematic diagram of the Wu et al. apparatus. (From H. Frauenfelder and E. M. Henley, Subatomic Physics, 2nd Edition. Copyright 1991 by Prentice-Hall, Inc. Reprinted by permission of Pearson Prentice-Hall.) A polarized nucleus emits electrons with momenta pt and P2 that are detected with intensities Ii and 72. The left figure shows the normal situation while the right figure shows what would be expected after applying the parity operator. Parity conservation implies the two situations cannot be distinguished experimentally (which was not the case).

It is convenient to classify the emitted radiation by the quantities of angular momentum l carried out by each quantum of energy co and by the properties of the radiation with respect to the inversion operation (parity). In this representation each photon emitted is characterized by its energy and quantum numbers l and m. There are two kinds of solutions of the Maxwell equations, characterized by different parity. This causes the... 

In these equations, J and M are quantum numbers associated with the angular momentum operators and J, respectively. The number II = 0, 1 is a parity quantum number that specifies the symmetry or antisymmetry of the column vector with respect to the inversion of the nuclei through G. Note that the same parity quantum number II appears for and Also, the... 

We now consider planar molecules. The electronic wave function is expressed with respect to molecule-fixed axes, which we can take to be the abc principal axes of ineitia, namely, by taking the coordinates (x,y,z) in Figure 1 coincided with the principal axes a,b,c). In order to detemiine the parity of the molecule through inversions in SF, we first rotate all the electrons and nuclei by 180° about the c axis (which is peipendicular to the molecular plane) and then reflect all the electrons in the molecular ab plane. The net effect is the inversion of all particles in SF. The first step has no effect on both the electronic and nuclear molecule-fixed coordinates, and has no effect on the electronic wave functions. The second step is a reflection of electronic spatial coordinates in the molecular plane. Note that such a plane is a symmetry plane and the eigenvalues of the corresponding operator then detemiine the parity of the electronic wave function. 

For the nanotubes, then, the appropriate symmetries for an allowed band crossing are only present for the serpentine ([ , ]) and the sawtooth ([ ,0]) conformations, which will both have C point group symmetries that will allow band crossings, and with rotation groups generated by the operations equivalent by conformal mapping to the lattice translations Rj -t- R2 and Ri, respectively. However, examination of the graphene model shows that only the serpentine nanotubes will have states of the correct symmetry (i.e., different parities under the reflection operation) at the K point where the bands can cross. Consider the K point at (K — K2)/3. The serpentine case always sat-... 

We first inquire as to the constants of the motion in this situation. Since h is invariant under the group of spatial rotations, and under spatial inversions, the total angular momentum and the parity operator are constants of the motion. The total angular momentum operator is... 

We have exhibited two constants of the motion that can be diagonalized simultaneously with h. A third constant of motion is the parity operator... 

The statement that quantum electrodynamics is invariant under such a spatial inversion (parity operation) can be taken as the statement that there exist new field operators >p (x ) and A x ) expressible in terms of tji(x) and Au(x) which satisfy the same commutation rules and equations of motion in terms of s as do ift(x) and A x) written in terms of x. In fact one readily verifies that the operators... 

Consider now spin-allowed transitions. The parity and angular momentum selection rules forbid pure d d transitions. Once again the rule is absolute. It is our description of the wavefunctions that is at fault. Suppose we enquire about a d-d transition in a tetrahedral complex. It might be supposed that the parity rule is inoperative here, since the tetrahedron has no centre of inversion to which the d orbitals and the light operator can be symmetry classified. But, this is not at all true for two reasons, one being empirical (which is more of an observation than a reason) and one theoretical. The empirical reason is that if the parity rule were irrelevant, the intensities of d-d bands in tetrahedral molecules could be fully allowed and as strong as those we observe in dyes, for example. In fact, the d-d bands in tetrahedral species are perhaps two or three orders of magnitude weaker than many fully allowed transitions. 

The theoretical reason is as follows. Although the placing of the ligands in a tetrahedral molecule does not define a centre of symmetry, the d orbitals are nevertheless centrosymmetric and the light operator is still of odd parity and so d-d transitions remain parity and orbitally Al = 1) forbidden. It is the nuclear coordinates that fail to define a centre of inversion, while we are considering a... 

Now look at octahedral complexes, or those with any other environment possessing a centre of symmetry e.g. square-planar). These present a further problem. The process of violating the parity rule is no longer available, for orbitals of different parity do not mix under a Hamiltonian for a centrosymmetric molecule. Here the nuclear arrangement requires the labelling of d functions as g and of p functions as m in centrosymmetric complexes, d orbitals do not mix with p orbitals. And yet d-d transitions are observed in octahedral chromophores. We must turn to another mechanism. Actually this mechanism is operative for all chromophores, whether centrosymmetric or not. As we shall see, however, it is less effective than that described above and so wasn t mentioned there. For centrosymmetric systems it s the only game in town. 

A mistake often made by those new to the subject is to say that The Laporte rule is irrelevant for tetrahedral complexes (say) because they lack a centre of symmetry and so the concept of parity is without meaning . This is incorrect because the light operates not upon the nuclear coordninates but upon the electron coordinates which, for pure d ox p wavefunctions, for example, have well-defined parity. The lack of a molecular inversion centre allows the mixing together of pure d and p ox f) orbitals the result is the mixed parity of the orbitals and consequent non-zero transition moments. Furthermore, had the original statement been correct, we would have expected intensities of tetrahedral d-d transitions to be fully allowed, which they are not. 

Thus, the parity operator reverses the sign of each cartesian coordinate. This operator is equivalent to an inversion of the coordinate system through the origin. In one and three dimensions, equation (3.64) takes the form... 

We show next that the parity operator IT commutes with the Hamiltonian operator H if the potential energy F(q) is an even function of q. The kinetic energy term in the Hamiltonian operator is given by... 

These eigenfunctions are also eigenfunctions of the parity operator, leading to the conclusion that c = 1. Consequently, some eigenfunctions will be of even parity while all the others will be of odd parity. 

The space inversion transformation is x —> —x and the corresponding operator on state vector space is called the parity operator (P). The parity operator reverses... 

Under the action of the parity operator P, the position and momentum commutator [Q,L] = ih, becomes... 

Therefore the parity operator is linear and unitary. Since the two consecutive... 

First consider the s and p type functions. The only nonzero matrix element of the operator cos 0/r2 (last term of the above expression) is between s and p7. Matrix elements of Hd between functions of the same parity are zero. Excluding the normalization constants and the spin-dependent part, the matrix element of the operator H,/ between s and p is... 

Parity nonconservation (PNC) effects, electric dipole moment search, 242 Parity operator ... 

Time reversal symmetry (T) basic principles, 240-241 electric dipole moment search, 241-242 parity operator, 243-244 Time scaling ... 

Some of the Hermite polynomials and the corresponding harmonic-oscillator wave functions are presented in Thble 1. The importance of the parity of these functions under the inversion operation, cannot be overemphasized. 

Excited states formed by light absorption are governed by (dipole) selection rules. Two selection rules derive from parity and spin considerations. Atoms and molecules with a center of symmetry must have wavefunctions that are either symmetric (g) or antisymmetric (u). Since the dipole moment operator is of odd parity, allowed transitions must relate states of different parity thus, u—g is allowed, but not u—u or g—g. Similarly, allowed transitions must connect states of the same multiplicity—that is, singlet—singlet, triplet-triplet, and so on. The parity selection rule is strictly obeyed for atoms and molecules of high symmetry. In molecules of low symmetry, it tends to break down gradually however,... 

---