Quantum chemical equations accuracy

Here, n corresponds to the principal quantum number, the orbital exponent is termed and Ylm are the usual spherical harmonics that describe the angular part of the function. In fact as a rule of thumb one usually needs about three times as many GTO than STO functions to achieve a certain accuracy. Unfortunately, many-center integrals such as described in equations (7-16) and (7-18) are notoriously difficult to compute with STO basis sets since no analytical techniques are available and one has to resort to numerical methods. This explains why these functions, which were used in the early days of computational quantum chemistry, do not play any role in modem wave function based quantum chemical programs. Rather, in an attempt to have the cake and eat it too, one usually employs the so-called contracted GTO basis sets, in which several primitive Gaussian functions (typically between three and six and only seldom more than ten) as in equation (7-19) are combined in a fixed linear combination to give one contracted Gaussian function (CGF),... 

If molecular electronic densities p(R) of satisfactory accuracy can be computed for large molecules, using the MEDLA, ALDA, or ADMA methods, then a 3D integration in the first term, and a trivial summation in the second term of equation (36) provides the force acting on nucleus a of the molecule. Quantum-chemical forces,... 

III.D) where the solute is treated quantum mechanically and the solvent molecules classically [186-197]. The second approach [185] may be implemented in an entirely classical framework (e.g., through the solution of the Poisson equation or the introduction of the generalized Born model in molecular mechanics) or in a quantum mechanical framework where the wavefunction of the solute is optimized self-con-sistently in the presence of the reaction field which represents the mutual polarization of the solute and the bulk solvent. Due to the complexity of solvation phenomena, both approaches contain a number of severe approximations, and if a quantum chemical description is employed at all, it is usually restricted to the solute molecule. When choosing such a quantum chemical description from the usual alternatives ab initio, DFT, or semiempirical methods) it should be kept in mind that ab initio or DFT calculations may provide an accuracy that is far beyond the overall accuracy of the underlying solvation model. For a balanced treatment it may be attractive to employ efficient semiempirical methods provided that they capture the essential physics of solvation. The performance and predictive power of such semiempirical solvation models may then be improved further by a specific parametrization. 

The use of quantum chemistry to obtain the individual rate coefficients of a free-radical polymerization process frees them from errors due to kinetic model-based assumptions. However, this approach introduces a new source of error in the model predictions the quantum chemical calculations themselves. As is well known, as there are no simple analytical solutions to a many-electron Schrodinger equation, numerical approximations are required. While accurate methods exist, they are generally very computationally intensive and their computational cost typically scales exponentially with the size of the system under study. The apphcation of quantum chemical methods to radical polymerization processes necessarily involves a compromise in which small model systems are used to mimic the reactions of their polymeric counterparts so that high levels of theory may be used. This is then balanced by the need to make these models as reahstic as possible hence, lower cost theoretical procedures are frequently adopted, often to the detriment of the accuracy of the calculations. Nonetheless, aided by rapid and continuing increases to computer power, chemically accurate predictions are now possible, even for solvent-sensitive systems [8]. In this section we examine the best-practice methodology required to generate accurate gas- and solution-phase predictions of rate coefficients in free-radical polymerization. 

While the accuracy of quantum chemical-derived parameters depends instead on the assumptions and numerical approximations used to solve the Schrodinger equation, in this chapter we have shown that, with appropriate care, these errors can be minimized, at least for flie key steps in radical polymerization. Indeed, as shown in the case study provided, ab initio kinetic modeling can be used to make first-principles predictions of the concentration profiles of reagents, intermediates, and products in a complicated multistep process such as the RAFT process. In making... 

In the last several years, we have developed coupled-cluster (CC) based quantum chemical methods (13), which are among the most accurate available in the field. Today, such methods are frequently those of choice when both high accuracy and wide applicability are required (14). In our CC efforts, we have generalized the ground state description of CC theory to that for excited states, via the equation-of-motion approach (extension for NMR spin-spin coupling... 

Thus, a number of simplifying approximations must be made that lead to different levels of quantum chemical methods. The most drastic approximations to the Schrddinger equation and extensive parameterization with experimental values are made in the so-called semiempirical methods. Although these methods are relatively fast, they are still ca. 100-1000 times slower than the force-field methods and give low accuracy. Moreover, the application of these methods to systems that were not included in the parametrization is quite risky and may lead to unreliable results. 

For small molecules, the accuracy of solutions to the Schrodinger equation competes with the accuracy of experimental results. However, these accurate ab initio calculations require enormous computation and are only suitable for the molecular systems with small or medium size. Ab initio calculations for very large molecules are beyond the realm of current computers, so HyperChem also supports semi-empirical quantum mechanics methods. Semi-empirical approximate solutions are appropriate and allow extensive chemical exploration. The inaccuracy of the approximations made in semi-empirical methods is offset to a degree by recourse to experimental data in defining the parameters of the method. Indeed, semi-empirical methods can sometimes be more accurate than some poorer ab initio methods, which require much longer computation times. 

---