Provenance research characterization Sourcing

Archaeologists have long sought methods for obsidian characterization that were rapid, reliable, non-destructive, and low-cost. Among the various methods investigated were visual techniques (79), density measurements (20), magnetic properties (27), thermoluminescence (22), fission-track analysis (25), Mossbauer spectroscopy (24), and natural radioactivity (25). Although some of the methods occasionally identified differences between sources, the overlap between sources was such that their overall reliability was unsatisfactory. The most successful method of characterization for obsidian provenance research has been compositional analysis (26). 

Since the mid-1960s, a variety of analytical chemistry techniques have been used to characterize obsidian sources and artifacts for provenance research (4, 32-36). The most common of these methods include optical emission spectroscopy (OES), atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), particle-induced X-ray emission spectroscopy (PIXE), inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS), X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF), and neutron activation analysis (NAA). When selecting a method of analysis for obsidian, one must consider accuracy, precision, cost, promptness of results, existence of comparative data, and availability. Most of the above-mentioned techniques are capable of determining a number of elements, but some of the methods are more labor-intensive, more destructive, and less precise than others. The two methods with the longest and most successful histoty of success for obsidian provenance research are XRF and NAA. 

---