Process equipment mixer-settlers

The RE process proceeds in three major types of equipment mixer-settler systems, column extractors, and centrifugal extractors. Countercurrent column extractors can be further subdivided into nonagitated nonproprietary columns and agitated proprietary extractors. Agitating the liquid-liquid system breaks up droplets and increases the interfacial area to improve the mass transfer and column efficiency. Various forms of energy input are used, e.g., rotation of propellers, impellers, and discs pulsation, vibration, and ultrasonic devices and centrifugal devices. 

Special safety constraints apply to equipment selection, design, and operation in nuclear reprocessing (269). Equipment should be reHable and capable of remote control and operation for long periods with minimal maintenance. Pulsed columns and remotely operated mixer—settlers are commonly used (270). The control of criticaHty and extensive monitoring of contamination levels must be included in the process design. 

The problems relating to mass transfer may be elucidated out by two clear-cut yet different methods one using the concept of equilibrium stages, and the other built on diffusional rate processes. The selection of a method depends on the type of device in which the operation is performed. Distillation (and sometimes also liquid extraction) are carried out in equipment such as mixer settler trains, diffusion batteries, or plate towers which contain a series of discrete processing units, and problems in these spheres are usually solved by equilibrium-stage calculation. Gas absorption and other operations which are performed in packed towers and similar devices are usually dealt with utilizing the concept of a diffusional process. All mass transfer calculations, however, involve a knowledge of the equilibrium relationships between phases. 

Solvent extraction carried out in conventional contactors like mixer-settlers and columns has certain limitations, including (a) controlling optimum dispersion and coalescence, (b) purifying both phases to ensure that stable emulsions are avoided (c) temperature control within a narrow band (d) high entrained solvent losses and related environmental and process economic effects and (e) large equipment dimensions and energy requirements when the density differential or selectivity is low. 

Mixer-settlers have been the more common type of equipment and, with the development of hydrometallurgy over the past 20 years, designs have improved considerably. To select the appropriate equipment, a clear understanding of the chemical and physical aspects of the process is required. Also the economics must be considered relative to the type of equipment to suit particular conditions of given throughput, solution and solvent type, kinetics and equilibrium, dispersion and coalescence, solvent losses, number of stages, available areas, and corrosion. 

Commercially available equipment for small-scale continuous test work on a solvent extraction process is limited. Generally, a series of small mixer-settlers... 

Because of the diversity of contacting equipment available, it is unlikely that all these contactors will be available in any one laboratory or pilot plant. Consequently, unless test work is carried out on similar contactors, the system may not be optimized. Since mixer-settlers are the easiest to construct, are simple to operate, and require little room and low-flow rates, these contactors are, in many cases, the only ones used to investigate a continuous solvent extraction process. This is by no means ideal and may result in abandonment of a process that, using another type of contactor, could be found to be entirely satisfactory. 

Irradiated UO2 is dissolved in nitric acid, resulting in a dissolver solution with the approximate composition listed in Table 12.7. This is treated by the Purex process. The main steps in the conventional Purex process are shown schematically in Fig. 12.5. All existing plants listed in Table 12.8 use some variation of the Purex process. Typically, the extractant composition (percentage TBP, diluent) and the extraction equipment (i.e., pulse columns, mixer-settlers, etc.), vary from plant to plant. However, the upper concentration limit is 30% TBP to prevent a phase reversal due to the increased density of the fully loaded solvent phase. 

In 1968, an electrolytic reduction process was proposed by A. Schneider and A. L. Ayers (6) to circumvent the above disadvantages. A research program was carried out in the Allied Chemical Corporation s laboratories during the years 1968 to 1972 to develop the process and equipment. The work resulted in the development of the Electropulse Column ( 7) for the continuous (differential) electrolytic uranium-plutonium partition process, which was later scaled up, fabricated, and installed in the Allied-General Nuclear Services reprocessing plant at Barnwell, South Carolina. About the same time, a stagewise electrolytic uranium-plutonium partition process was tested on a mini mixer-settler unit in Germany. (8)... 

Timothy C. Frank, Ph.D. Research Scientist and Sr. Technical Leader, The Dow Chemical Company Member, American Institute of Chemical Engineers (Section Editor, Introduction and Overview, Thermodynamic Basis for Liquid-Liquid Extraction, Solvent Screening Methods, Liquid-Liquid Diversion Fundamentals, Process Fundamentals and Basic Calculation Methods, Dual-Solvent Fractional Extraction, Extractor Selection, Packed Columns, Agitated Extraction Columns, Mixer-Settler Equipment, Centrifugal Extractors, Process Control Considerations, Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation Equipment, Emerging Developments)... 

William D. Prince, M.S. Process Engineering Associate, The Dow Chemical Company Member, American Institute of Chemical Engineers (Extractor Selection, Agitated Extraction Columns, Mixer-Settler Equipment)... 

---