Potentiometric sensors enzyme electrodes

Enzyme electrodes with amperometric indication have certain advantages over potentiometric sensors, chiefly because the product of the enzymic reaction is consumed at the electrode and thus the response time is decreased. For this reason, the potentiometric glucose enzyme electrode, based on reaction (8.1) followed by the reaction of HjO, with iodide ions sensed by an iodide ISE [39], has not found practical use. 

Enzyme sensors are based primarily on the immobilization of an enzyme onto an electrode, either a metallic electrode used in amperometry (e.g., detection of the enzyme-catalyzed oxidation of glucose) or an ISE employed in potentiometry (e.g., detection of the enzyme-catalyzed liberation of hydronium or ammonium ions). The first potentiometric enzyme electrode, which appeared in 1969 due to Guilbault and Montalvo [140], was a probe for urea with immobilized urease on a glass electrode. Hill and co-workers [141] described in 1986 the second-generation biosensor using ferrocene as a mediator. This device was later marketed as the glucose pen . The development of enzyme-based sensors for the detection of glucose in blood represents a major area of biosensor research. 

Composite potentiometric sensors involve systems based on ion-selective electrodes separated from the test solution by another membrane that either selectively separates a certain component of the analyte or modifies this component by a suitable reaction. This group includes gas probes, enzyme electrodes and other biosensors. Gas probes are discussed in this section and chapter 8 is devoted to potentiometric biosensors. 

Among potentiometric enzyme sensors, the urea enzyme electrode is the oldest (and the most important). The original version consisted of an enzyme layer immobilized in a polyacrylamide hydrophilic gel and fixed in a nylon netting attached to a Beckman 39137 glass electrode, sensitive to the alkali metal and NHj ions [19, 2A Because of the poor selectivity of this glass electrode, later versions contained a nonactin electrode [20,22] (cf. p. 187) and especially an ammonia gas probe [25] (cf. p. 72). This type of urea electrode is suitable for the determination of urea in blood and serum, at concentrations from 5 to 0.05 mM. Figure 8.2 shows the dependence of the electrode response... 

The classic potentiometric enzyme electrode is a combination of an ion-selective electrode-based sensor and an immobilized (insolubilized) enzyme. Few of the many enzyme electrodes based on potentiometric ion- and gas-selective membrane electrode transducers have been included in commercially available instruments for routine measurements of biomolecules in complex samples such as blood, urine or bioreactor media. The main practical limitation of potentiometric enzyme electrodes for this purpose is their poor selectivity, which does not arise from the biocatalytic reaction, but from the response of the base ion or gas transducer to endogenous ionic and gaseous species in the sample. 

How analytical methods deal with interferences is one of the more ad hoc aspects of method validation. There is a variety of approaches to studying interference, from adding arbitrary amounts of a single interferent in the absence of the analyte to establish the response of the instrument to that species, to multivariate methods in which several interferents are added in a statistical protocol to reveal both main and interaction effects. The first question that needs to be answered is to what extent interferences are expected and how likely they are to affect the measurement. In testing blood for glucose by an enzyme electrode, other electroactive species that may be present are ascorbic acid (vitamin C), uric acid, and paracetamol (if this drug has been taken). However, electroactive metals (e.g., copper and silver) are unlikely to be present in blood in great quantities. Potentiometric membrane electrode sensors (ion selective electrodes), of which the pH electrode is the... 

Because each enzyme sensor has its own unique response, it is necessary to construct the calibration curve for each sensor separately. In other words, there is no general theoretical response relationship, in the same sense as the Nernst equation is. As always, the best way to reduce interferences is to use two sensors and measure them differentially. Thus, it is possible to prepare two identical enzyme sensors and either omit or deactivate the enzyme in one of them. This sensor then acts as a reference. If the calibration curve is constructed by plotting the difference of the two outputs as the function of concentration of the substrate, the effects of variations in the composition of the sample as well as temperature and light variations can be substantially reduced. Examples of potentiometric enzyme electrodes are listed in Table 6.5. 

Chapters 1 to 5 deal with ionophore-based potentiometric sensors or ion-selective electrodes (ISEs). Chapters 6 to 11 cover voltammetric sensors and biosensors and their various applications. The third section (Chapter 12) is dedicated to gas analysis. Chapters 13 to 17 deal with enzyme based sensors. Chapters 18 to 22 are dedicated to immuno-sensors and genosensors. Chapters 23 to 29 cover thick and thin film based sensors and the final section (Chapters 30 to 38) is focused on novel trends in electrochemical sensor technologies based on electronic tongues, micro and nanotechnologies, nanomaterials, etc. 

Vegetable tissue based electrochemical sensors can be divided into two groups according to their principle of operation potentiometric and amperometric. Such devices are usually prepared in a manner similar to that of conventional enzyme electrodes, with the detection of an electroactive species that is consumed or produced by the enzyme present in the vegetable tissue. 

The stability of enzyme electrodes is difficult to define because an enzyme can lose some of its activity. Deterioration of immobilized enzyme in the potentiometric electrodes can be seen by three changes in the response characteristics (a) with age the upper limit will decrease (e.g., from 10-2 to 10 3 moll-1), (b) the slope of the analytical (calibration) curve of potential vs. log [analyte] decrease from 59.2 mV per decade (Nernstian response) to lower value, and (c) the response time of the biosensor will become longer as the enzyme ages [59]. The overall lifetime of the biosensor depends on the frequency with which the biosensor is used and the stability depends on the type of entrapment used, the concentration of enzyme in the tissue or crude extract, the optimum conditions of enzyme, the leaching out of loosely bound cofactor from the active site, a cofactor that is needed for the enzymatic activity and the stability of the base sensor. 

The gas-sensing electrodes also are used for the potentiometric measurement of biologically important species. An enzyme is immobilized at or near the gas probe. The gas sensor measures the amount of characteristic gas produced by the reaction of the analyzed substance with the enzyme. For example, an enzyme electrode for urea [NH2C(0)NH2] determination is constructed by the immobilization of urease onto the surface of an ammonia-selective electrode. When the electrode is inserted into a solution that contains urea, the enzyme catalyzes its conversion to ammonia ... 

In the field of biosensor technology, immobilized enzyme electrode development occupies a place of prominence due to the attractive performance of this hybrid device. Coupling an immobilized enzyme layer with an electrochemical sensor combines the advantages of using an insolubilized enzyme system (see below) with the sensitivity of readily available potentiometric and amperometric electrodes. The resulting biosensor enables direct, reliable, and reproducible... 

The choice of an appropriate electrochemical sensor is governed by several requirements (1) the nature of the substrate to be determined (ions or redox species) (2) the shape of the final sensor (microelectrodes) (3) the selectivity, sensitivity, and speed of the measurements and (4) the reliability and stability of the probe. The most frequently used sensors operate under potentiometric or amperometric modes. Amperometric enzyme electrodes, which consume a specific product of the enzymatic reaction, display an expanded linear response... 

A potentiometric L-lhreonine selective sensor for determining L-threonine in biological fluids and foods utilizes threonine deaminase in conjunction with an NH3 gas-sensing electrode. The biosensor exhibits a linear response to l-threonine concentration over the 0.1-200 mM range (292). Comparing l-tryptophan bacteria and immobilized enzyme electrodes shows that the enzyme probe is stable for less than 5 days but that the bacterial probe functions for approximately 3 weeks (293). 

Clearly, electrochemical indication prevails over all other methods of transduction. Potentiometric and amperometric enzyme electrodes are at the leading edge of biosensor technology with respect to the body of scientific literature as well as to commercially available devices (Schindler and Schindler, 1983). Only a few conductometric biosensors have been described, but the relevance of this sensor type may increase because of the relative ease of their preparation and use. Furthermore, the development of biochemically sensitized field effect transistors, being at present only at an initial stage, offers new prospects (Pinkerton and Lawson, 1982). 

The linear measuring range of biosensors extends over 2-5 decades of concentration. The lower detection limit of simple amperometric enzyme electrodes is about 100 nmol/1 whereas potentiometric sensors may only be applied down to 100 pmol/1. This shows that the sensitivity is effected not only by the enzyme reaction but also by the transducer. 

In potentiometric enzyme electrodes lyases producing carbon dioxide or ammonia are used as terminal enzymes of sequences. In fact, the term enzyme sequence electrode was introduced on the occasion of the design of a potentiometric D-gluconate sensor containing gluconate kinase (EC 2.7.1.12) and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.44) (Jensen and Rechnitz, 1979). The authors found that for such a sensor to function the optimal pH values of the enzymes and the transducer should be close to each other. Furthermore, cofactors, if necessary, must not react with one another nor with constituents of the sample. It was concluded that the rate of substance conversion in multiple steps cannot exceed that of the terminal enzyme reaction. A linear concentration dependence is obtained when an excess of all enzymes of the sequence is provided, i.e. complete conversion occurs of all substrates within the enzyme membrane. Different permeabilities of the different substrates results in different sensitivities. This is particularly important with combinations of disaccharidases and oxidases, where the substrate is cleaved to two monosaccharides of approximately the same molecular size. The above... 

The above authors coimmobilized choline oxidase and AChE on a nylon net which was fixed to a hydrogen peroxide probe so that the esterase was adjacent to the solution. The apparent activities were 200-400 mU/cm2 for choline oxidase and 50-100 mU/cm2 for AChE. The sensitivity of the sequence electrode for ACh was about 90% of that for choline, resulting in a detection limit of 1 pmol/l ACh. The response time was 1-2 min. The parameters of this amperometric sensor surpass those of potentiometric enzyme electrodes for ACh (see Section 3.1.25). Application to brain extract analysis has been announced. 

The natural specificity of enzyme-catalyzed reactions can be used as the basis for selective detection of analytes (49, 64-68). One fruitful approach has featured potentiometric sensors with a structure similar to that of Figure 2.4.5, with the difference that the gap between the ion-selective electrode and the polymer diaphragm is filled with a matrix in which an enzyme is immobilized. 

Amperometric electrode instruments, nonenzyme electrodes, amperometric enzyme electrodes, potentiometric enzyme electrodes Various CO2 gas sensors... 

Next we have to define the boundary and the initial conditions. For so called zero flux sensors there is no transport of any of the participating species across the sensor/enzyme layer boundary. Such condition would apply to, e.g., optical, thermal or potentiometric enzyme sensors. In that case the first space derivatives of all variables at point x are zero. On the other hand amperometric sensors would fall into the category of non-zero-flux sensors by this definition and the flux of at least one of the species (product or substrate) would be given by the current through the electrode. 

---