Polystyrene dynamic mechanical behavior

Figure 8.29 Dynamic mechanical behavior of polystyrene-Wocfc-polybutadiene-Woc/f-polystyrene, a function of the styrene-butadiene mole ratio (123,124).

Styrene decreases the viscosity of SPS significantly relative to atactic polystyrene and offsets that effect. From a practical standpoint, the dynamic mechanical behavior of SPS reveals that SPS softens appreciably at its glass transition temperature, thus to maintain mechanical strength up to the melting point, the polymer needs to be reinforced. 

DMPPO and polystyrene form compatible blends. The two components are miscible in all proportions (59). Reported dynamic—mechanical results that indicate the presence of two phases in some blends apparendy are caused by incomplete mixing (60). Transition behavior of thoroughly mixed blends indicates that the polymers are truly compatible on a segmental level (61). CompatibiUty may be attributed to a %— % interaction between the aromatic rings of the two polymers sufficient to produce a negative heat of mixing. However, the forces are very small, ie, = ca40 J/mol (9.6 cal/g), and any... 

The physical properties of the acid- and ion-containing polymers are quite interesting. The storage moduli vs. temperature behavior (Figure 8) was determined by dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) for the PS-PIBMA diblock precursor, the polystyrene diblock ionomer and the poly(styrene)-b-poly(isobutyl methacrylate-co-methacrylic acid) diblock. The last two samples were obtained by the KC>2 hydrolysis approach. It is important to note that these three curves are offset for clarity, i.e. the modulus of the precursor is not necessarily higher than the ionomer. In particular, one should note the same Tg of the polystyrene block before and after ionomer formation, and the extension of the rubbery plateau past 200°C. In contrast, flow occurred in... 

Although the dynamic mechanical properties and the stress-strain behavior iV of block copolymers have been studied extensively, very little creep data are available on these materials (1-17). A number of block copolymers are now commercially available as thermoplastic elastomers to replace crosslinked rubber formulations and other plastics (16). For applications in which the finished object must bear loads for extended periods of time, it is important to know how these new materials compare with conventional crosslinked rubbers and more rigid plastics in dimensional stability or creep behavior. The creep of five commercial block polymers was measured as a function of temperature and molding conditions. Four of the polymers had crystalline hard blocks, and one had a glassy polystyrene hard block. The soft blocks were various kinds of elastomeric materials. The creep of the block polymers was also compared with that of a normal, crosslinked natural rubber and crystalline poly(tetra-methylene terephthalate) (PTMT). 

Block Ionomers. The block ionomers to be discussed are of AB or ABA type, in which one of the blocks is ionic (eg, sodium methacrylate) and the other consists of nonionic units (eg, polystyrene). While ionic block copolymers in a micelle form in both aqueous and nonaqueous solutions have been studied extensively (99-101,130,131), the viscoelastic properties of block ionomers in bulk have not received much attention (132-137). If the short ionic blocks formed micelle-like aggregates, which were surrounded by nonionic blocks, the viscoelastic properties of the diblock ionomers would be very similar to those of stars or polymers of low molecular weight (136). Thus, above the Tg of the nonionic blocks, as the temperature increased the modulus dropped rapidly with a very short rubbery plateau. For example, in a dynamic mechanical study, it was found that a homopolymer containing 490 styrene units showed a Tg at ca 115°C, and started to flow at ca 150°C. However, in the case of a diblock ionomer containing 490 styrene units and 40 sodium methacrylate ionic units showed a Tg at ca 116°C, and flow behavior was observed above ca 165°C, which was only 15°C higher than that of nonionic polystyrene (135). 

Hourston, D.J. and Hughes, I.D. (1979) Dynamic mechanical and sonic velocity behavior of polystyrene-poly(vinyhnethyl ether) blends. Polymer, 19, 1181-1185. 

Few examples of the homogeneous diblock-incompatible homo-polymer behavior have been reported. One that has received considerable attention is the system polystyrene-poly-a-methylstyrene (2). Block copolymers of styrene and a-methylstyrene exhibit a single loss peak in dynamic experiments (2,3) and have been shown to be thermorheologi-cally simple (4) hence they are considered to be homogeneous. Mechanical properties data on these copolymers also has been used to validate interesting extensions of the molecular theories of polymer viscoelasticity (2,3,4). 

---