Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Mechanical-dynamical results

The excluded-volume parameter for PS was derived from viscosimetric data in good solvent collected by Nystrom and Roots for different molecular masses [113], The internal viscosity characteristic time Tq was obtained from best-fit data [12] of mechanical-dynamical results due to Massa, Schrag, Ferry, and Osaki [102,103] (see Figure 10). In analogy with what was previously found by other authors, notably Kirkwood and Riseman on the same polymer (PS) with different solvents [19], fitting the experimental data seems to require two different values of R ff = C/6to/s, one to obtain v q) through Eqn. (3.1.9) and a second one to evaluate to = I kg T, the latter... [Pg.335]

Figure C2.1.14. (a) Real part and (b) imaginary part of tire dynamic shear compliance of a system whose mechanical response results from tire transition between two different states characterized by a single relaxation time X. Figure C2.1.14. (a) Real part and (b) imaginary part of tire dynamic shear compliance of a system whose mechanical response results from tire transition between two different states characterized by a single relaxation time X.
Maiti and Bhowmick reported exciting results that a polar matrix like fluoroelastomer (Viton B-50) was able to exfoliate unmodified clay (Cloisite NA ) as well as the modified one (Cloisite 20A) [93]. They studied morphology, mechanical, dynamic mechanical and swelling properties of fluoroelastomer nanocomposites. The unmodified-clay-filled systems showed better properties than the modified ones (Table 2.3). [Pg.39]

In both the occasions, well-dispersed, fine graphite flakes are visible within the EVA matrices and this results in superior mechanical, dynamic mechanical, and processibility characteristics over the systems having natural graphite. An example is given in Figure 4.3 [5]. [Pg.90]

If we want to study the implications of various features of potential energy surface to dynamical results we have to carry out the dynamics. From a practical point of view, we can use classical mechanics. One numerically solves Hamilton s equations... [Pg.234]

The purpose of this chapter is a detailed comparison of these systems and the elucidation of the transition from regular to irregular dynamics or from mode-specific to statistical behavior. The main focus will be the intimate relationship between the multidimensional PES on one hand and observables like dissociation rate and final-state distributions on the other. Another important question is the rigorous test of statistical methods for these systems, in comparison to quantum mechanical as well as classical calculations. The chapter is organized in the following way The three potential-energy surfaces and the quantum mechanical dynamics calculations are briefly described in Sections II and III, respectively. The results for HCO, DCO, HNO, and H02 are discussed in Sections IV-VII, and the overview ends with a short summary in Section VIII. [Pg.751]

Tg values can be determined via either calorimetric, dynamic scanning calorimetry (DSC) or mechanical dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) measurements. However, since three dimensional highly crosslinked systems have relatively small amounts of molecular motion, the DSC method is not particularly sensitive for Tg determination [131,132]. Fry and Lind have reported that DSC is misleading, as reactive groups are often sufficiently entrapped in the vitrified structure to give spurious results [133]. [Pg.123]

The SL3 and MC PESs have shown to give quite different dynamical results for the O ( D) - - H2 reaction. In a comparative study, Fitzgerald and Schatz [19] have shown that the MC PES favours a collinear approach of the O atom to the H2 molecule, while the SL3 PES favours an insertion mechanism preceded by a perpendicular approach. [Pg.27]

Dynamic mechanical property (DMP) measurements are used to evaluate the suitability of a polymer for a particular use in sound and vibration damping. Since the dynamic mechanical properties of a polyurethane are known to be affected by polymer morphology (4), it is important to establish the crystallization and melting behavior as well as the glass transition temperature of each polymer. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to determine these properties and the data used to interpret the dynamic mechanical property results. [Pg.282]

Wenning and Miiser [74] extended the considerations made above for athermal, flat walls to the interaction between a curved tip and a flat substrate by including Hertzian contact mechanics. Since the Hertzian contact area A increases proportionally to they concluded that for a dry, nonadhesive, commensurate tip substrate system, Fg should scale linearly with L, since is independent of A. This has now been confirmed experimentally by Miura and Kamiya for M0S2 flakes on M0S2 surfaces [74a]. For a dry, nonadhesive, disordered tip pressed on a crystalline substrate, they obtained Fg oc which was obtained by inserting A oc into Fg oc Lfs/A. The predictions were confirmed by molecular dynamics simulations, in which special care was taken to obtain the proper contact mechanics. The results of the friction force curve are shown in Fig. 6. [Pg.207]

Table III. Formulations and Dynamic Mechanical Spectroscopy Results for Polyurethane Elastomers... Table III. Formulations and Dynamic Mechanical Spectroscopy Results for Polyurethane Elastomers...
The adsorbed surfactant film is assumed to control the mechanical-dynamical properties of the surface layers by virtue of its surface viscosity and elasticity. This concept may be true for thick films (>100 run) whereby intermolecular forces are less dominant (i.e., foam stability under dynamic conditions). Surface viscosity reflects the speed of the relaxation process which restores the equilibrium in the system after imposing a stress on it. Surface elasticity is a measure of the energy stored in the surface layer as a result of an external stress. [Pg.330]

FIG. 4.4 Dynamic mechanical test results for bleach hard surface cleaner. (Reprinted from U.S. Patent 5,688,435.)... [Pg.85]


See other pages where Mechanical-dynamical results is mentioned: [Pg.1058]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.640]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.1064]    [Pg.3279]    [Pg.614]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.2695]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.358]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.335 ]




SEARCH



Comparison of Dynamic Mechanical and Dielectric Results

Dynamic Mechanical and Dielectric Results

Dynamic Results

Dynamic mechanical thermal analysis results

Dynamic mechanisms

Dynamical mechanical

Resultant Dynamics

© 2024 chempedia.info