Polymers, contact angles

Membrane Polymer Contact angle (°) Hydrophilidty Manufacturer... 

The extensive use of the Young equation (Eq. X-18) reflects its general acceptance. Curiously, however, the equation has never been verified experimentally since surface tensions of solids are rather difficult to measure. While Fowkes and Sawyer [140] claimed verification for liquids on a fluorocarbon polymer, it is not clear that their assumptions are valid. Nucleation studies indicate that the interfacial tension between a solid and its liquid is appreciable (see Section K-3) and may not be ignored. Indirect experimental tests involve comparing the variation of the contact angle with solute concentration with separate adsorption studies [173]. 

The lubricating properties of tears are an important feature in normal blinking. Kalachandra and Shah measured the coefficient of friction of ophthalmic solutions (artificial tears) on polymer surfaces and found no correlation with viscosity, surface tension or contact angle [58]. The coefficient of friction appears to depend on the structure of the polymer surfaces and decreases with increasing load and sliding speed. 

Early waterproofing treatments consisted of coatings of a continuous layer impenetrable by water. Later water-repellent fabrics permitted air and moisture passage to improve the comfort of the wearer. Aluminum and zirconium salts of fatty acids, siUcone polymers, and perfluoro compounds are apphed to synthetic as well as natural fibers. An increase in the contact angle of water on the surface of the fiber results in an increase in water repeUency. Hydrophobic fibers exhibit higher contact angles than ceUulosics but may stiU require a finish (142). 

The use of the harmonic mean often leads to better predictions of interfacial tensions between polymers and better contact angles between liquids and polymer solids, but the criterion for maximization of the work of adhesion is the same as... 

Section 4.1 briefly describes some of the commonly employed experimental tools and procedures. Chaudhury et al., Israelachvili et al. and Tirrell et al. employed contact mechanics based approach to estimate surface energies of different self-assembled monolayers and polymers. In these studies, the results of these measurements were compared to the results of contact angle measurements. These measurements are reviewed in Section 4.2. The JKR type measurements are discussed in Section 4.2.1, and the measurements done using the surface forces apparatus (SFA) are reviewed in Section 4.2.2. 

The surface forces apparatus (Section 2.3) enables the estimation of a surface energy term, Fq (Eq. 9), providing sufficiently smooth surfaces can be produced. In recent years Chaudhury, Pocius and colleagues have made a valuable contribution to the field of adhesion by developing the technique to study energies of adhesion and of surface energies of polymers [81-85]. These SFA results provide alternatives to values based on traditional destructive tests or contact angle measurements. 

Being sensitive to the chemical composition of the outermost layers of the surface, contact angle measurement is widely used for characterizing polymer surfaces. Surface characterization for polymers using contact angle measurement and XPS will now be described in detail, as these are the most widely used methods. 

Measurement of the contact angle at a solid-liquid interface is a widely used method for the determination of the surface energy of solid polymers. Fowkes [1] first proposed that the surface energy of a pure phase, y y could be represented by the sum of the contribution from different types of force components, especially the dispersion and the polar components, such that ... 

The effect of thermal aging on polyethylene and isotactic polypropylene have been studied by Konar et al. [49]. They used contact angle, contact angle hysteresis, and XPS to characterize the modified surfaces of the polymers. Hysteresis increased with aging temperature. In the case of polyethylene, thermal aging led to a significant increase in adhesion strength of polyethylene with aluminium, but the increase in the case of polypropylene was much less marked. 

---