Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Polymerization activation-deactivation

It can also be noted that reversible chain transfer, in RAFT and similar polymerizations, and reversible activation-deactivation, in NMP and ATRP,... [Pg.251]

A wide range of nitroxidcs and derived alkoxyamincs has now been explored for application in NMP. Experimental work and theoretical studies have been carried out to establish structure-property correlations and provide further understanding of the kinetics and mechanism. Important parameters are the value of the activation-deactivation equilibrium constant K and the values of kaa and (Scheme 9.17), the combination disproportionation ratio for the reaction of the nilroxide with Ihe propagating radical (Section 9.3.6.3) and the intrinsic stability of the nitroxide and the alkoxyamine under the polymerization conditions (Section 9.3.6.4). The values of K, k3Cl and ktieact are influenced by several factors.11-1 "7-"9 ... [Pg.472]

The activity of initiators in ATRP is often judged qualitatively from the dispersity of the polymer product, the precision of molecular weight control and the observed rates of polymerization. Rates of initiator consumption are dependent on the value of the activation-deactivation equilibrium constant (A") and not simply on the activation rate constant ( acl). Rate constants and activation parameters are becoming available and some valuable trends for the dependence of these on initiator structure have been established.292"297... [Pg.492]

Optimal conditions for ATRP depend strongly on the particular monomer(s) to be polymerized. This is mainly due to the strong dependence of the activation-deactivation equilibrium constant (A ), and hence the rate of initiation, on the type of propagating radical (Section 9.4.1.3). When using monomers of different types, polymer isolation and changes in the catalyst are frequently necessary before making the second block... [Pg.542]

Both methods require that the polymerization of the first monomer not be carried to completion, usually 90% conversion is the maximum conversion, because the extent of normal bimolecular termination increases as the monomer concentration decreases. This would result in loss of polymer chains with halogen end groups and a corresponding loss of the ability to propagate when the second monomer is added. The final product would he a block copolymer contaminated with homopolymer A. Similarly, the isolated macroinitiator method requires isolation of RA X prior to complete conversion so that there is a minimum loss of functional groups for initiation. Loss of functionality is also minimized by adjusting the choice and amount of the components of the reaction system (activator, deactivator, ligand, solvent) and other reaction conditions (concentration, temperature) to minimize normal termination. [Pg.322]

Temperature effects on the polymerization activity and MWD of polypropylene have been examined in the range of —78 °C to 3 °C 82 The MWD of polypropylene obtained at temperatures below —65 °C was close to a Poisson distribution, while the MWD at higher temperatures above—48 °C became broader (Slw/IWIii = 1.5-2.3). At higher temperatures the polymerization rate gradually decreased during the polymerization, indicating the existence of a termination reaction with deactivation of active centers. It has been concluded that a living polymerization of propylene takes place only at temperatures below —65 °C. [Pg.215]

To the present day there is an ongoing search for the magic additive which allows molar mass control of Nd-catalyzed polymerizations without a detrimental effect on polymerization activities. This search is documented in the scientific as well as in the patent literature. In this context ethanol, dihydronaphthaline, chloroform, diethyl aniline, triphenylmethane, octanoic acid, allyl iodide and diallylether were unsuccessfully evaluated [464,465]. Also propylene, oxygen, 1,5-hexadiene, ethyltrichloroacetate and n-butanol resulted in the deactivation of the catalyst system without the desired reduction of molar mass [157]. [Pg.79]

In conventional free radical polymerization, the initiation, propagation, and termination are kinetically coupled. Consequently, the increase of initiation rate increases the overall polymerization rate but reduces the degree of polymerization. In contrast to this situation (kinetically coupled initiation, propagation, and termination), the formation of chemically reactive species is not the initiation of a subsequent polymerization. Under such an activation/deactivation decoupled reaction system, the mechanism for how chemically reactive species are created and how these species react to form solid material deposition cannot be viewed in analogy to polymerization. [Pg.35]

In cascade arc plasma polymerization, a monomer (or monomers) is introduced in the expansion chamber. Because of an extremely high velocity of gas injected from a small nozzle (e.g., 3 mm in diameter), the second gas injected into the expansion chamber in vacuum cannot migrate into the cascade arc generator. Thus, the activation of Ar in the cascade arc generator and deactivation of the excited neutral species of Ar in the expansion chamber, which activate the monomer introduced in the expansion chamber, are totally decoupled. LPCAT plasma polymerization occurs under such a spatially and temporally decoupled activation/ deactivation system. [Pg.49]

CrA sites, the most numerous of the three in this preparation, were identified as the most reactive species and comprise the sites that are active in ethylene polymerization, whereas Crc sites were found to be inactive. CrB sites were also thought to exhibit polymerization activity, but distinctions were made. The concentration of these surface species could be varied with the chromium content and with the conditions of the thermal pretreatments [279]. Heating the catalyst under vacuum at 700 °C, which caused a deactivation for ethylene polymerization, was found to convert CrA into Crc whereas CrB remained unaffected. [Pg.161]

Living radical polymerization (LRP) has attracted growing attention as a powerful synthetic tool for well-defined polymers 1,2). The basic concept of LRP is the reversible activation of the dormant species Polymer-X to the propagating radical Polymer (Scheme la) 1-3). A number of activation-deactivation cycles are requisite for good control of chain length distribution. [Pg.160]


See other pages where Polymerization activation-deactivation is mentioned: [Pg.461]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.621]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.897]    [Pg.1034]    [Pg.1495]    [Pg.3250]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.522]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.81]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.531 ]




SEARCH



Activated polymerization

Activation deactivation

Activator polymerization

Living radical polymerization activation-deactivation processes

Polymerization activity

Polymerization, activation

© 2024 chempedia.info