Polymer Carbon explanation

The second explanation for the formation of the stereoirregular polymer is that the propagation of 2 is essentially an SN1 type reaction, and that attack d (broken arrow) in 14 is depressed by the interaction of the outer-ring oxygen atom with the positively charged carbon atom of the oxycarbenium ion from the upper side of the... 

Since model compounds reveal well-defined cyclic voltammograms for the Cr(CNR)g and Ni(CNR)g complexes (21) the origin of the electroinactivity of the polymers is not obvious. A possible explanation (12) is that the ohmic resistance across the interface between the electrode and polymer, due to the absence of ions within the polymer, renders the potentially electroactive groups electrochemically inert, assuming the absence of an electronic conduction path. It is also important to consider that the nature of the electrode surface may influence the type of polymer film obtained. A recent observation which bears on these points is that when one starts with the chromium polymer in the [Cr(CN-[P])6] + state, an electroactive polymer film may be obtained on a glassy carbon electrode. This will constitute the subject of a future paper. 

This polymer, prepared by copper catalysed air oxidation of dipropynyl carbonate, exploded readily on warming or manipulation. The corresponding adipate and sebacate esters are non-explosive. The authors wonder if peroxide formation is involved such explanation seems otiose. 

Hargreaves has suggested that the insolubilization of some closely related polymers is due to photolytic homolysis of the endoperoxide 0-0 bond and subsequent generation of carbon-centered radicals from the O radicals (19). There are several facts that make this an extremely unlikely explanation for the data described here these include the quantitative insufficiency of the maximum amount of endoperoxide reaction obtainable with a few hundred mJ/cm2 dose (homolysis quantum yield <0.5 (46), and extinction coefficient 1 (M cm)-1 (47)), and the synthetic utility of such homolysis reactions in related molecules in the presence of good hydrogen atom donors (implying facile epoxide formation) (48). Clearly the crosslinking observed under N2 is not accounted for by this mechanism. 

When we look more closely at the intermediate polymer chain we see an alternative explanation emerging. After the first insertion has taken place a stereogenic centre has been obtained at carbon 2, see Figure 10.4. Coordination with the next propene may take place preferentially either with the re-face or the si-face, with the methyl group pointing up or down, as displayed in Figure 10.4. 

The combination of cis-trans isomerism with iso-syndio and erythro-threo dispositions gives complex stractures as exemplified by the 1,4 polymers of 1-or 4-monosubstituted butadienes, such as 1,3-pentadiene (72, 73), and 2,4-pentadienoic acid (74, 75) and of 1,4-disubstituted butadienes, for example, sorbic acid (76). This last example is described in 32-35 (Scheme 6, rotated Fischer projection). Due to the presence of three elements of stereoisomerism for each monomer unit (two tertiary carbons and the double bond) these polymers have been classed as tritactic. Ignoring optical antipodes, eight stereoregular 1,4 structures are possible, four cis-tactic and four trans-tactic. In each series (cis, trans) we have two diisotactic and two disyndiotactic polymers characterized by the terms erythro and threo in accordance with the preceding explanation. It should be noted that here the erythro-threo relationship refers to adjacent substituents that belong to two successive monomer units. 

Photolysis of cyclobutanone leads to the formation of ethylene, ketene, carbon monoxide, propylene (3), and cyclopropane (5). The formation of an isomeric product, presumed to be 3-butenal, in small yield has been reported (31). The yields of ethylene and ketene have been found to be approximately equivalent (6). The yield of carbon monoxide is in excess of the yield of hydrocarbons (5,6). The discrepancy has been attributed to the formation of a polymer (5) although no direct evidence to substantiate this explanation has been obtained. The stoichiometry of the decomposition may be represented by the following equations ... 

Natta et al. (167,188,287,298,312) have built a strong case in favor of a coordinated anionic mechanism in which an electropositive metal complexes and polarizes the monomer and a polymer anion adds to the positively polarized carbon of the monomer. One of the points which was used to support the anionic mechanism was that the order of reactivity for ethylene, propylene and butene is opposite to that of cationic catalysts. The lower reactivity of propylene and butene versus ethylene was attributed to the electron releasing alkyl groups (287), but steric hindrance is believed to be a better explanation. Support for the steric effect is indicated by the influence of bulk placed at some distance from the double bond (116). For example, reactivity decreases sharply in the order pentene-1 > 4-methylpentene-l > 4,4-dimethylpentene-l, although basicity of the double bonds must change only very slightly. 

An explanation of the observed relaxation transition of the permittivity in carbon black filled composites above the percolation threshold is again provided by percolation theory. Two different polarization mechanisms can be considered (i) polarization of the filler clusters that are assumed to be located in a non polar medium, and (ii) polarization of the polymer matrix between conducting filler clusters. Both concepts predict a critical behavior of the characteristic frequency R similar to Eq. (18). In case (i) it holds that R= , since both transitions are related to the diffusion behavior of the charge carriers on fractal clusters and are controlled by the correlation length of the clusters. Hence, R corresponds to the anomalous diffusion transition, i.e., the cross-over frequency of the conductivity as observed in Fig. 30a. In case (ii), also referred to as random resistor-capacitor model, the polarization transition is affected by the polarization behavior of the polymer matrix and it holds that [128, 136,137]... 

---