Pollution Agreement

EPD, 2003b. Development of a biological indicator system for monitoring marine pollution, Agreement No. CE 2/2001(EP), Environmental Protection Department, Hong Kong SAR Government. 

Except as specifically provided in the U.S. CFR, any existing point source subject to this subpart must achieve the effluent limitations shown in Table 9.19 which represents the degree of effluent reduction attainable by applying the BAT. Alternatively, for the metal finishing industrial facilities with cyanide treatment, and upon agreement between a source subject to those limits and the pollution control authority, the amenable cyanide limit shown in Table 9.20 may apply in place of the total cyanide limit specified in Table 9.19. No user subject to the provisions of these regulations shall augment the use of process wastewater or otherwise dilute the wastewater as a partial or total substitute for adequate treatment to achieve compliance with this limitation. 

PSNS, shown in Table 9.25. Alternatively, for industrial facilities with cyanide treatment, and upon agreement between a source subject to these limits and the pollution control authority, the amenable cyanide limit shown in Table 9.26 may apply in place of the total cyanide limit specified in Table 9.25. 

Within the scope of quality agreements in production, environment, or laboratory, quality is often stipulated to a standard value x0 (target value). For demands regarding quality, this standard value may be an upper limit (e.g. in case of pollution and contamination) or a lower limit (e.g. for active reagents). The statistical situation is the same when a quality criterion has to exceed or fall below a standard value. The problem is illustrated here by the practical situation of manufacturer and customer as shown in Fig. 4.11. 

Several round-robin intercalibrations for trace metals in seawater [26-30] have demonstrated a marked improvement in both analytical precision and numerical agreement of results among different laboratories. However, it has often been claimed that spurious results for the determination of metals in seawater can arise unless certain sampling devices and practical methods of sampler deployment are applied to the collection of seawater samples. It is therefore desirable that the biases arising through the use of different, commonly used sampling techniques be assessed to decide upon the most appropriate technique ) for both oceanic baseline and nearshore pollution studies. 

Halliday et al. [396] have described a simple rapid graphite furnace method for the determination of lead in amounts down to 1 xg/l in polluted seawater. The filtered seawater is diluted with an equal volume of deionised water, ammonium nitrate added as a matrix modifier, and aliquots of the solution injected into a tantalum-coated graphite tube in an HGA-2200 furnace atomiser. The method eliminates the interference normally attributable to the ions commonly present in seawater. The results obtained on samples from the Firth of Forth (Scotland, UK) were in good agreement with values determined by anodic stripping voltammetry. 

Chemical analysis of the Meza River and its tributaries revealed significant heavy metal pollution of the upper Meza River sediments with lead, zinc, and some molybdenum, cadmium and arsenic enrichments. The trend of Cd and As is similar to trend of Pb and Zn, which is in agreement with the fact that Cd and As are associated with Pb and Zn in ore minerals (Strucl, 1984 Fux Gosar, 2007). In the lower Meza valley, these heavy metal concentrations decreased somewhat. 

Under both national and international agreements, the process of quantitatively predicting the probability of an adverse response in ecosystem health due to exposure to one or more pollutants is collectively known as Environmental Risk Assessment, ERA (US EPA, 1992). 

Whittle [29] has described a thin-layer chromatographic method for the identification of hydrocarbon marker dyes in oil polluted waters. McLeod et al. [25] conducted interlaboratory comparisons of methods for determining traces of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons in marine sediments. Agreement within a factor of 2 to 3 was obtained between the 12 participating laboratories. 

Klenke et al. [5] described a technique for extraction of humic and fulvic acids from stream sediments and outlined methods for their determination. By means of flame atomic absorption spectrometry, the levels of environmentally important heavy metals (cadmium, copper, chromium, cobalt, nickel and lead) in the fulvic and humic acid extracts were compared with those in the original sediment samples. The pattern distribution of the respective metals in the two cases showed very close agreement, suggesting that the combined extract of humic and fulvic acids could be used as an indicator of the level of heavy metal pollution in flowing waters. 

Mndoor air pollution survey carried oul with founding from HK ITC and contracted to Acron International Technologies, Inc. 2data based on survey conducted by EHS Consulting Ltd Agreement CE 14/95... 

The so-called persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are the subject of the Rio Declaration (1994) and the Stockholm Convention (2001) these international agreements (yet to be ratified in all signatory countries, including the United States) call for the elimination from production of 12 persistent chemicals, including the chlorinated pesticides and PCBs mentioned above (all of which have already been eliminated from production in the United States). Current regulatory efforts in the European Union and the United States place emphasis on elimination or restriction of all PBTs (persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic chemicals). 

In recognition of the threat posed by these compounds, the United Nations ratified the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants in 2004. This agreement seeks to end the release and use of 12 of the most problematic POPs with limited use of DDT being... 

---