Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Polarization methods concentration effects

A color difference ratio allows us not only to evaluate the usual luminance contrast (4.59), but also to evaluate a color purity and the color hue that makes the human eye very sensitive to the variation of CDR. Reference [170] demonstrates the increase by a factor of three of the number of distinguished rows of the display when evaluating by the colorimetry methods. This effect may be understood by the fact that the human eye is more sensitive to the color contrast than to the luminance one, as the hue and the chroma both contribute to the former. Color differences between on and off display states could be optimized by a special choice of polarizers [170-172], concentration of a dichroic dye (guest) in a liquid crystal matrix (host) [166, 173], using the reflective screens [173], etc. Colorimetric evaluations are very useful in the quality control of both the guest host and twist displays [172, 174]. [Pg.188]

The research on corrosion, started in this institute in the 1950s, continued successfully further. The intergranular corrosion of steels was measured by an electrochemical potentiodynamic reactivation method [310-312]. Since the 1960s, the passivity of brass was further studied, the rates of corrosion were measured by polarization resistance, the effect of deformation on anodic dissolution of steels was followed, and the surface roughness of metals was measured other subjects of research were, e.g., the behavior of passive films on steel, the effect of compositirai and motion of electrolyte on corrosion of passivated aluminum, the cathodic protection of passive metals against corrosion, the anodes for cathodic protection of steels, etc.[313-316]. Measurements of polarization resistance in the system iron—concentrated sulfuric acid or boiling nitric acid, of corrosion and matter... [Pg.27]

The model adopted by Ri and Eyring is not now acceptable, but some of the more recent treatments of electrostatic effects are quite close to their method in principle. In dealing with polar substituents some authors have concentrated on the interaction of the substituent with the electrophile whilst others have considered the interaction of the substituent with the charge on the ring in the transition state. An example of the latter method was mentioned above ( 7.2.1), and both will be encountered later ( 9.1.2). They are really attempts to explain the nature of the inductive effect, and an important question which they raise is that of the relative importance of localisation and electrostatic phenomena in determining orientation and state of activation in electrophilic substitutions. [Pg.136]

Other considerations aside, the use of dilute reagents minimizes effects of nonideality. This allows the use of concentrations in place of activities. Of course, the time scale, the sensitivity of the analytical method at different concentrations, and the use of other reaction components introduce additional considerations. Tied closely to this decision is the choice of solvent. Reaction rates may (or may not) be affected by such variables as polarity, dielectric constant, hydrogen-bonding ability, donor capacity, and viscosity. A change in solvent may change not only the rate but also the mechanism and possibly even the products. One cannot even assume that the net reaction is the... [Pg.10]

High polarity is one of the reasons why both the ionic and amphoteric surfactants, and especially their metabolites, are difficult to detect. This property, however, is important for the application tasks of surface-active compounds, but is also the reason for their high water solubility. Due to this fact, their extraction and concentration from the water phase, which can be carried out in a number of very different ways, is not always straightforward. Furthermore, they are often not volatile without decomposition, which thus prevents application of gas chromatographic (GC) separation techniques combined with appropriate detection. This very effective separation method in environmental analysis is thus applicable only for short-chain surfactants and their metabolites following derivatisation of the various polar groups in order to improve their volatility. [Pg.24]


See other pages where Polarization methods concentration effects is mentioned: [Pg.49]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.937]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.2070]    [Pg.821]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.606]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.832]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.603]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.137]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.110 ]




SEARCH



Concentration methods

Concentration polarization

Polar effect

Polarity, effect

Polarization effects

Polarization methods

© 2024 chempedia.info