Polar substances, vaporization

The equations given predict vapor behavior to high degrees of accuracy but tend to give poor results near and within the Hquid region. The compressibihty factor can be used to accurately determine gas volumes when used in conjunction with a virial expansion or an equation such as equation 53 (77). However, the prediction of saturated Hquid volume and density requires another technique. A correlation was found in 1958 between the critical compressibihty factor and reduced density, based on inert gases. From this correlation an equation for normal and polar substances was developed (78) ... 

Also of interest is the maximum capacity of each phase for chemicals, i.e., the saturation concentration above which phase separation occurs. For water, this is obviously the solubility in water. For many polar substances, the chemical and water are miscible (e.g., ethanol) and no solubility limit exists. Similarly, a solubility limit in octanol may or may not exist. For air, the solubility corresponds to the saturation vapor pressure Ps. This can be converted to a solubility in units of mol / m3 by dividing by RT, the gas constant — absolute temperature product. Chapter 7 discusses solubility in water. Solubility in octanol is not by itself of comparable interest and is not treated. Vapor pressure and solubility in water are not only of fundamental interest, but their ratio H is essentially the Henry s Law constant or air-water partition coefficient, as Chapter 4 discusses. 

Zcoii/y is the sum of two Gaussians, the first centered at y = 0 to ensure the correct behavior in the limit of zero density, and the second centered at the rectilinear diameter yT to provide the correct value of residual Helmholtz energy at high density. The temperature dependence of yu is given universal [2], The parameters b and c, which determine the second and third virial coefficients, are given universally for non-polar substances [3]. The pre-exponential factor w has a dominating influence on the vapor pressure. Its temperature dependence requires two substance-specific correction parameters wi and w2. 

The fugacity coefficients are calculated using a simplified equation of state described earlier 4,6). For this treatment the constants b and Oi are calculated by knowing the critical temperature and pressure. The attraction coefficient ° is given by generalized coefficients for nonpolar substances and with two other individual constants for polar substances. If Yi refers tp the vapor composition and n refers to binary vapor interactions, the equation becomes... 

In azeotropic distillation, the entrainer and the two components being separated can produce under some conditions three-phase equilibria. Two liquid phases may be in equilibrium with a vapor phase. For the three-phase equilibria the solubility of the nonpolar substance in the polar phase is denoted by x, the solubility of the polar substance in the nonpolar phase by y, and the corresponding activity coefficients by y and r, respectively. The relative volatility for components i and / is related to the total composition X according to... 

The PR eos has been extended by Stryjek and Vera [10] to polar substances by introducing a substance-specific parameter. The modification also gives improved fitting of the vapor pressure of normal fluids. The function of the PRSV equation is given by... 

The PR eos has been modified by Stryjek and Vera to extend to polar substances that do not follow the three-parameter principle of corresponding states. The modified eos is fitted to the vapor pressure of polar substances with additional substance-specific parameters. The PRSV equation has been described in Equation (4.163) et seq. The free-energy-matched mixture eos parameters are given in Equations (4.436) and (4.438) the fugacity coefficients are given in Equation (4.439). PRSV eos using the UNIEAC activity coefficient predicts the vie data for both ethanol/water mixtures at 423-623°K and acetone/water mixtures at 373-523°K from low to high pressure. 

Prausnitz (1,2) has discussed this problem extensively, but the most successful techniques, which are based on either closed equations of state, such as discussed in this symposium, or on dilute liquid solution reference states such as in Prausnitz and Chueh (3), are limited to systems containing nonpolar species or dilute quantities of weakly polar substances. The purpose of this chapter is to describe a novel method for calculating the properties of liquids containing supercritical components which requires relatively few data and is of general applicability. Used with a vapor equation of state, the vapor-liquid equilibrium for these systems can be predicted to a high degree of accuracy even though the liquid may be 30 mol % or more of the supercritical species and the pressure more than 1000 bar. 

The presence of strong dipoles and a large overall dipole moment makes water a very polar substance. Properties of water that are dependent on its dipole moment include its freezing point, melting point, vapor pressure, and ability to dissolve many substances. 

Eor mixtures containing polar substances, more complex predictive equations for that involve binary-interaction parameters for each pair of components in the mixture are required for use in Eq. (13-4), as discussed in Sec. 4. Six popular expressions are the Mar-gules, van Laar, Wilson, NRTL, UNIFAC, and UNIQUAC equations. Extensive listings of binary-interaction parameters for use in all but the UNIFAC equation are given by Gmehling and Onken (op. cit.). They obtained the parameters for binary systems at 101.3 kPa (1 atm) from best fits of the experimental T-y-x equilibrium data by setting and Of to their ideal-gas, ideal-solution limits of 1.0 and P VP respectively, with the vapor pressure P given by a three-constant Antoine equation, whose values they tabulate. Table 13-2 lists their parameters for some of the binary systems included in... 

Apolar substances have low solubility parameters, whereas those of polar substances are high, since the heat of vaporization is higher for the latter. Apolar, noncrystalline polymers will therefore dissolve well in solvents with low 81 values. Predictions about solubility on the basis of the solubility parameter are still quite permissible for polar, noncrystalline polymers in... 

This result can be taken as the reference. It becomes obvious that the ideal gas law and the virial equation are not appropriate to be used at 20 bar. The error of the Soave-Redlich-Kwong equation (2.4%) might be acceptable however, the equation has some difficulties with water as a strongly polar substance. Usually, even better results can be expected. The Soave-Redlich-Kwong equation is generalized, that is, Tc, Pc, and co are the only input that is used, whereas the second virial coefficient had been adjusted to vapor densities. 

The operations used to either wet- or dry-spin acrylics are essentially the same as those already described for rayon and acetate, respectively. The polymer must be completely dissolved in solvent and the solution filtered to remove any impurities that would cause spinnerette blockage. Because acrylic polymers are not soluble in common nonpolar solvents, polar substances such as dimethylfonnamide, dimethylacetamide, or aqueous solutions of inorganic salts such as zinc chloride or sodium thiocyanate are required. Only wet spinning is possible with the latter. Dimethyl formamide boils at 152.8°C and exerts a vapor pressure of 3.7 mm of Hg at 25°C compared with acetone (used in dry spinning of cellulose acetate), which has a vapor pressure of 228.2 mm of Hg at 25 C. It follows that, unlike acetone which requires an activated-carbon system for recovery, dimethylformamide may be condensed directly from the gas stream... 

---