Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Platinum surfaces chemisorption

Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) results have provided detailed infomiation about CO adsorption on many surfaces. Figure A3.10.24 shows UPS results for CO adsorption on Pd(l 10) [58] that are representative of molecular CO adsorption on platinum surfaces. The difference result in (c) between the clean surface and the CO-covered surface shows a strong negative feature just below the Femii level ( p), and two positive features at 8 and 11 eV below E. The negative feature is due to suppression of emission from the metal d states as a result of an anti-resonance phenomenon. The positive features can be attributed to the 4a molecular orbital of CO and the overlap of tire 5a and 1 k molecular orbitals. The observation of features due to CO molecular orbitals clearly indicates that CO molecularly adsorbs. The overlap of the 5a and 1 ti levels is caused by a stabilization of the 5 a molecular orbital as a consequence of fomiing the surface-CO chemisorption bond. [Pg.951]

The first step of oxide-layer formation is oxygen adsorption (chemisorption). In the case of platinum, the process stops at this stage, and depending on the conditions, an incomplete or complete monolayer of adsorbed oxygen is present on the platinum surface. In the case of other metals, layer formation continues. When its thickness 5 has attained two to three atomic diameters, the layer is converted to an individual surface phase that is crystalline (more seldom, amorphous) and has properties analogous to those of the corresponding bulk oxides. [Pg.301]

Chemisorption of oxygen at Pt(lll) has been studied in detail by Ertl s group25 and the STM evidence is for complex structural features present in the temperature range 54M60K (Figure 4.14). The limitations of the Langmuir model, frequently invoked for reactions at platinum surfaces, is obvious from... [Pg.63]

Figure 3.35 shows the potential dependence of the integrated band intensity of the linear CO observed in the experiment described above and the corresponding variation in the methanol oxidation current. The latter was monitored as a function of potential after the chemisorption of methanol under identical conditions to those employed in the IRRAS experiments. As can be seen from the figure the oxidation of the C=Oads layer starts at c. 0.5 V and the platinum surface is free from the CO by c. 0.65 V. The methanol oxidation current shows a corresponding variation with potential, increasingly sharply as soon as the CO is removed strong evidence in support of the hypothesis that the adsorbed CO layer established at 0.4 V acts as a catalytic poison for the electro-oxidation of methanol. [Pg.282]

Since the early work of Langmuir (1), the chemisorption of carbon monoxide on platinum surfaces has been the subject of numerous investigations. Besides its scientific interest, an understanding of CO chemisorption on Pt is of considerable practical importance for example, the catalytic reaction of CO over noble metals (such as Pt) is an essential part of automobile emission control. [Pg.79]

There is a wealth of information available on CO chemisorption over single-crystal and polycrystalline platinum surfaces under ultrahigh-vacuum conditions research efforts in this area have gained a significant momentum with the advent of various surface analysis techniques (e.g., 2-8). In contrast, CO chemisorption on supported platinum catalysts (e.g., 9, 10, 11) is less well understood, due primarily to the inapplicability of most surface-sensitive techniques and to the difficulties involved in characterizing supported metal surfaces. In particular, the effects of transport resistances on the rates of adsorption and desorption over supported catalysts have rarely been studied. [Pg.79]

Our article has concentrated on the relationships between vibrational spectra and the structures of hydrocarbon species adsorbed on metals. Some aspects of reactivities have also been covered, such as the thermal evolution of species on single-crystal surfaces under the UHV conditions necessary for VEELS, the most widely used technique. Wider aspects of reactivity include the important subject of catalytic activity. In catalytic studies, vibrational spectroscopy can also play an important role, but in smaller proportion than in the study of chemisorption. For this reason, it would not be appropriate for us to cover a large fraction of such work in this article. Furthermore, an excellent outline of this broader subject has recently been presented by Zaera (362). Instead, we present a summary account of the kinetic aspects of perhaps the most studied system, namely, the interreactions of ethene and related C2 species, and their hydrogenations, on platinum surfaces. We consider such reactions occurring on both single-crystal faces and metal oxide-supported finely divided catalysts. [Pg.272]

The adsorption and ordering characteristics of the various hydrocarbon molecules on the low Miller index platinum surfaces are discussed in great detail elsewhere. These two surfaces appear to be excellent substrates for ordered chemisorption of hydrocarbons, which permit one to study the surface crystallography of these important organic molecules. The conspicuous absence of C-H and C-C bond breaking during the chemisorption of hydrocarbons below 500 K and at low adsorbate pressures (10 9-10-6 Torr) clearly indicates that these crystal faces are poor catalysts and lack the active sites that can break the important C-C and C-H chemical bonds with near zero activation energy. [Pg.35]

C. Hydrocarbon Chemisorption on High Miller Index (Stepped) Platinum Surfaces... [Pg.35]

The chemisorption of over 25 hydrocarbons has been studied by LEED on four different stepped-crystal faces of platinum (5), the Pt(S)-[9(l 11) x (100)], Pt(S)-[6(l 11) x (100)], Pt(S)-[7(lll) x (310)], and Pt(S)-[4(l 11 x (100)] structures. These surface structures are shown in Fig. 7. The chemisorption of hydrocarbons produces carbonaceous deposits with characteristics that depend on the substrate structure, the type of hydrocarbon chemisorbed, the rate of adsorption, and the surface temperature. Thus, in contrast with the chemisorption behavior on low Miller index surfaces, breaking of C-H and C-C bonds can readily take place at stepped surfaces of platinum even at 300 K and at low adsorbate pressures (10 9-10-6 Torr). Hydrocarbons on the [9(100) x (100)] and [6(111) x (100)] crystal faces form mostly ordered, partially dehydrogenated carbonaceous deposits, while disordered carbonaceous layers are formed on the [7(111) x (310)] surface, which has a high concentration of kinks in the steps. The distinctly different chemisorption characteristics of these stepped-platinum surfaces can be explained by... [Pg.35]

The chemisorption of hydrocarbons, ethylene, cyclohexene, n-heptane, benzene and naphthalene at room temperature and above were studied on both the Au(l 11) and Au[6(l 11) x (100)] stepped surfaces (29). The difference in the adsorption characteristics of hydrocarbons on gold surfaces and on platinum surfaces is striking. The various light hydrocarbons studied (ethylene, cyclohexene, n-heptane, and benzene) chemisorb readily on the Pt(lll) surface. These molecules, on the other hand, do not adsorb on the Au(lll) surface under identical experimental conditions as far as can be judged by changes that occur in the Auger spectra. Naphthalene, which forms an ordered surface structure on the Pt(lll) face, forms a disordered layer on adsorption on the Au(l 11)surface. [Pg.37]

The chemisorption process of methanol on clean platinum surfaces has been found to be far faster than the steady-state oxidation rate for methanol, with the result that the initial electro-oxidation current is found rapidly to decay with time. The origin of this decrease is now known to be the accumulation of adsorbed intermediates on the surface whose further oxidation to COz is slow, and the rate differences allow us to separate the... [Pg.635]

We have seen that the process of oxidation of methanol involves the formation of chemisorbed fragments, predominantly COads and (probably) =C-OH. At lower potentials (E < 0.5 V), chemisorption of methanol on a clean platinum surface is faster than subsequent oxidation of the chemisorbed fragments to C02, but all investigators have reported that a steady-state can be established, in which a small residual current flows. It is less clear what the rate-limiting step is for this residual current, and intensive studies were first carried out by Bagotzky and Vassiliev [5] to attempt to distinguish the mechanism. For 1 M methanol/0.05 M H2S04 on smooth... [Pg.670]

In addition to Eqs. (l)-(9) the rate of the transport processes should also be considered. Phenomenologically the following explanation can be given. If the measurement is started by using a clean platinum surface after the addition of HCOOH, depending on the rates of the transport processes and the adsorption, the surface will be covered by adsorbed HCOOH [Eq. (1)]. The adsorption is quickly followed by the chemisorption step [Eq. (2)]. It can easily be observed if HCOOH is added to the supporting electrolyte at open-circuit since a fast decrease of the potential occurs due to the formation of a -> hydrogen electrode ... [Pg.192]

Whereas the rate-determining step for hydrogen molecule oxidation now is recognized69,70 to be the dissociative chemisorption of the hydrogen molecule on dual sites at the platinum surface, the rate of this step is so high that in most electrochemical environments platinum electrocatalysts are almost always operating under diffusion control. [Pg.415]

Our studies of olefin and acetylene chemisorption states on platinum surfaces is presently incomplete. Ethylene and acetylene chemisorption on platinum (111) are complicated by the apparent presence of more than one chemisorption state (indicated by thermal desorption studies). When C2HH and C2D1, are chemisorbed on Pt(lll), the small fraction of ethylene thermally desorbed as ethylene comprises nearly a statistical mixture of all possible molecules. Thus we see here reversible C-H (and C-D) bond breaking on this flat platinum surface. In an analogous experiment with C2H2 and C2D2> only a small extent of H-D exchange was observed for the small fraction of acetylene molecules that reversibly desorb from this surface (11). [Pg.286]

Aity quantitative inteqjretation is still difficult to make, since the mass variations result from several coupled processes replacement of adsorbed hydrogen, water molecules and supporting anions by strongly adsorbed species from methanol chemisorption, reorganization of the double layer, formation of oxygenated species at the platinum surface, etc. [Pg.434]

The electrocatalytic oxidation of ethanol has been investigated for many years on different platinum-based electrodes, including Pt/X alloys (with X = Ru, Sn, Mo, etc ), and dispersed nanocatalysts. Pme platinum smooth electrodes are rapidly poisoned by some strongly adsorbed intermediates, such as carbon monoxide, resulting from the dissociative chemisorption of the molecule, as shown by the first experiments in infrared reflectance spectroscopy (EMIRS). Both kinds of adsorbed CO, either linearly-bonded or bridge-bonded to the platinum surface, are observed. Besides, oth-... [Pg.452]

These conditions must be satisfied in order to correctly apply the steady-state approximation to a reaction sequence. Consider the H-D exchange with ethylidyne (CCH3 from the chemisorption of ethylene) on a platinum surface. If the reaction proceeds in an excess of deuterium the backward reactions can be ignored. The concentrations of the adsorbed ethylidyne species have been monitored by a technique called secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS). The concentrations of the various species are determined through mass spectroscopy since each of the species on the surface are different by one mass unit. Creighton et al. [Surf. Sci., 138 (1984) L137] monitored the concentration of the reactive intermediates for the first 300 s, and the data are consistent with what are expected from three consecutive reactions. The results are shown in Figure 4.2.2. [Pg.109]


See other pages where Platinum surfaces chemisorption is mentioned: [Pg.118]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.671]    [Pg.675]    [Pg.775]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.72]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.138 ]




SEARCH



Platinum chemisorption

Platinum surfaces

Surface Chemisorption

© 2024 chempedia.info