Plastics morphology

ZRI 07] Zribi K., Elleuch K., Feller J.F., et al., Eco-plastics morphological and mechanical properties of recycled poly(carbonate)-crushed rubber (RPC-CR) blends . Polymer Engineering and Science, vo. AT, no. 11, pp. 1768-1776,2007. 

Table 1. Plastics Morphology. (All tables in this article are taken from the source DVR, Injection Molding Division Newsletter,...

There are tests for physical properties such as deasity and hardness (qv) of plastics. Microscopy (qv) is important ia fracture analysis as well as ia analysis of the morphology of polymer systems for an understanding of polymer blend performance. 

Mechanical properties of mbber-modifted epoxy resins depend on the extent of mbber-phase separation and on the morphological features of the mbber phase. Dissolved mbber causes plastic deformation and necking at low strains, but does not result in impact toughening. The presence of mbber particles is a necessary but not sufficient condition for achieving impact resistance. Optimum properties are obtained with materials comprising both dissolved and phase-separated mbber (305). 

Since the last edition several new materials have been aimounced. Many of these are based on metallocene catalyst technology. Besides the more obvious materials such as metallocene-catalysed polyethylene and polypropylene these also include syndiotactic polystyrenes, ethylene-styrene copolymers and cycloolefin polymers. Developments also continue with condensation polymers with several new polyester-type materials of interest for bottle-blowing and/or degradable plastics. New phenolic-type resins have also been announced. As with previous editions I have tried to explain the properties of these new materials in terms of their structure and morphology involving the principles laid down in the earlier chapters. 

Urethane structural adhesives have a morphology that is inverse to the toughened epoxy just described. The urethanes have a rubber continuous phase, with glass transition temperatures of approximately —50°C. This phase is referred to as the .soft segment . Often, a discontinuous plastic phase forms within the soft segment, and that plastic phase may even be partially crystalline. This is referred to as the hard segment . A representation of the morphology is shown in Fig. 3 [34]. 

The morphology of a typical urethane adhesive was previously shown in Fig. 3. The continuous phase usually comprises the largest part of the adhesive, and the adhesion characteristics of the urethane are usually controlled by this phase. From a chemical standpoint, this continuous phase is usually comprised of the polyol and the small amount of isocyanate needed to react the polyol chain ends. A wide variety of polyols is commercially available. A few of the polyols most commonly used in urethane adhesives are shown in Table 2. As a first approximation, assuming a properly prepared bonding surface, it is wise to try to match the solubility parameters of the continuous phase with that of the substrate to be bonded. The adhesion properties of the urethane are controlled to a great extent by the continuous phase. Adhesion to medium polarity plastics, such as... 

As regards the general behaviour of polymers, it is widely recognised that crystalline plastics offer better environmental resistance than amorphous plastics. This is as a direct result of the different structural morphology of these two classes of material (see Appendix A). Therefore engineering plastics which are also crystalline e.g. Nylon 66 are at an immediate advantage because they can offer an attractive combination of load-bearing capability and an inherent chemical resistance. In this respect the arrival of crystalline plastics such as PEEK and polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) has set new standards in environmental resistance, albeit at a price. At room temperature there is no known solvent for PPS, and PEEK is only attacked by 98% sulphuric acid. 

The various studies of shock-modified powders provide clear indications of the principal characteristics of shock modification. The picture is one in which the powders have been extensively plastically deformed and defect levels are extraordinarily large. The extreme nature of the plastic deformation in these brittle materials is clearly evident in the optical microscopy of spherical alumina [85B01]. In these defect states their solid state reactivities would be expected to achieve values as large as possible in their particular morphologies greatly enhanced solid state reactivity is to be expected. 

Unlike incompatible heterogeneous blends of elastomer-elastomer, elastomer-plastic, and plastic-plastic, the reactively processed heterogeneous blends are expected to develop a variable extent of chemical interaction. For this reason the material properties, interfacial properties, and phase morphology of reactively processed blends would differ significantly from heterogeneous mixtures. 

---