Physicists notation

The construction (ij kl) is called an antisymmetrized two electron integral in physicists notation. 

For one-electron integrals over spin orbitals, the chemists and physicists notations are essentially the same. 

When using the physicists notation, it is necessary to show the upper limits of summation, since we have not introduced a notation analogous to round brackets. The convention we use is as follows. If no upper limit appears, the sum is over spin orbitals. If the upper limit is N/2, the sum is over spatial orbitals. Thus using the physicists notation Eq. (2.177) is... 

In this section, we will use the physicists notation for two-electron integrals rather than the chemists notation, which we used extensively in Chapter 3. We do this not out of perversity or even laziness but because almost all the literature in this area uses this notation, and we believe that one should develop equal facility with both notations. Recall that in the physicists notation... 

This is known as the physicist s notation, where the ordering of the functions is given by the electron indices. They may also be written in an alternative order with both functions depending on electron 1 on the left, and the functions depending on electron 2 on the right this is known as the Mulliken or chemist s notation. 

An analogous equation holds for the spin-down Fock matrix. The two-electron integrals in round brackets are defined by chemist s (11122) rather than the usual physicist s (12112) notation as ... 

These theories may have been covered (or at least mentioned) in your physical chemistry courses in statistical mechanics or kinetic theory of gases, but (mercifully) we will not go through them here because they involve a rather complex notation and are not necessary to describe chemical reactors. If you need reaction rate data very badly for some process, you will probably want to fmd the assistance of a chemist or physicist in calculating reaction rates of elementary reaction steps in order to formulate an accurate description of processes. 

Yes, I know. Very confusing. But it s all just notation, and can be understood. In physicist s notation (equivalent to Dirac notation), tpitpjitpk tpi) refers to the two electron integral where and are functions of electron 1, while -j and ipi are functions of electron 2. Chemist s notation (with the square brackets []) places the functions of electron 1 on the left and the functions of... 

We have chosen the notation to match the physicists convention. The reader should check that the absolute bracket is well defined, i.e., that its value does not depend on the choice of v and w in their respective equivalence classes. 

Note also that we employ physicist s notation for functions, in which both z = z(u) and z = z(x, y) express how z depends on the variables specified in parentheses (even though the mathematical formulas that express this dependence might be quite different in the two cases). Although somewhat unmathematical, the chosen notation better expresses the experimental relationship (1.1), in which control variables xt might be chosen for convenience in many ways, but the target property z is independent of this choice. For example, the volume of a sphere could be equivalently expressed in terms of its measured diameter [V = V(d) = ra/3/6] or surface area [V = V(A) = (tt1 2/6)A3 2], despite the fact that the mathematical dependence (i.e., whether there is a cubic or three-halves power in the chosen measurement argument) is different in the two cases. 

Physicist P. A. M. Dirac suggested an inspired notation for the Hilbert space of quantum mechanics [essentially, the Euclidean space of (9.20a, b) for / — oo, which introduces some subtleties not required for the finite-dimensional thermodynamic geometry]. Dirac s notation applies equally well to matrix equations [such as (9.7)-(9.19)] and to differential equations [such as Schrodinger s equation] that relate operators (mathematical objects that change functions or vectors of the space) and wavefunctions in quantum theory. Dirac s notation shows explicitly that the disparate-looking matrix mechanical vs. wave mechanical representations of quantum theory are actually equivalent, by exhibiting them in unified symbols that are free of the extraneous details of a particular mathematical representation. Dirac s notation can also help us to recognize such commonality in alternative mathematical representations of equilibrium thermodynamics. 

There is one question connected with thermodynamics, that of notation. The continental notation and the American chemical notation of Lewis and Randall are quite different. Each has its drawbacks. The author has chosen the compromise notation of the Joint Committee of the Chemical Society, the Faraday Society, and the Physical Society (all of England), which preserves the best points of both. It is hoped that this notation, which has a certain amount of international sanction, may become general among both physicists and chemists, whose poblems are similar enough so that they surely can use the same language. 

The notation of a superscript (ir), used here to distinguish irrational quantities from their rational counterparts, where the definitions differ, is clumsy. However, in the published literature it is unfortunately customary to use exactly the same symbol for the quantities e, ju, D, ff, xe, and X whichever definition (and corresponding set of equations) is in use. It is as though atomic and molecular physicists were to use the same symbol h for Planck s constant and Planck s constant/2rc. Fortunately the different symbols h and h have been adopted in this case, and so we are able to write equations like h = 2nh. Without some distinction in the notation, equations like (5), (6), (7) and (8) are impossible to write, and it is then difficult to discuss the relations between the rationalized SI equations and quantities and their irrational esu and emu equivalents. This is the reason for the rather cumbersome notation adopted here to distinguish quantities defined by different equations in the different systems. 

We can now write the Schrodinger equation for any system. The problem is how can we solve it for any system, or for even one system It turns out that we can solve the equation exactly for a one-electron system. All other cases will require some form of approximation. We ll not try to reproduce that solution here. For now we shall concentrate only the solutions and interpret them. A word of warning we revert back to the physicist s notation. In a subsequent chapter, we will explicitly connect the language of the physicist to that of the mathematician. We begin, for completeness, with the Schrodinger equation once more... 

It is necessary to return to the slight annoyance of notation here. Physicists like to call the principal quantum number n but mathematicians like to use n for the degree of the polynomial Y. So in this chapter, we are using k for the principal quantum number to be consistent with our mathematical derivation of the solutions in earlier chapters. It is k that tells you the energy level. 

The name of catenanes originates from latin catena which means a chain. Indeed these supramolecules are fundamentally made from interlocked macrocycles (Figure 1(a)) with, as already mentioned, ability of a relative movement of one macrocycle with respect to the another one(s) (pirouetting). The number of macrocycle is included in the used notation [n] catenanes denote n interlocked chains. Up to now supramolecules of up to 4 macrocycles were synthesized. Large catenanes (M = 10 ) are present in nature in DNA as intermediates during the replication, transcription, and recombination process. Since the first two-ring cate-nane was obtained in early sixties, smaller synthetic catenanes (M = 10 ) have attracted the interest of chemists and physicists. 

In the mathematical literature, the random variables are often denoted by (0 and the realizations of those variables by x(t) [31, 32], An alternative notation is to denote the random variables by capital letters, and the realizations by lower case ones. These distinctions are often ignored by physicists, for economy of notation. We shall, in our discussion of the Langevin equation, adapt the physicists s notation. The distinction becomes more important in the calculation of drift and diffusion coefficients and is consequently adhered to in the appendices. 

Since I am a chemist writing for chemists, my emphasis and notation will probably appear clumsy to the physicists primarily responsible for the theory. For this I make no excuse. Elegant derivations and condensed notation are in my opinion not desirable in an introduction to a field. 

The physicist s notation, in two-electron theory, is to order the spin orbitals with their complex conjugates on the left of the electron repulsion operator and in the order starting with the coordinates of electron one, with equation 5.38 written as... 

The ERIs over contracted functions (in the so-called chemist s notation with square brackets, rather than in physicist s notation with angle brackets, (12 12) = [11 22]),... 

Fig. 3.9 Diagram of enantiomeric molecules (L and R) made of matter and antimatter (L and R ) with the notation Left and Right, used by physicists for the enantiomers instead of D/L or R/S. With CPT symmetry, the pair L and R (L and R) have the same energy. Thus,...

---