Chemist’s notation

This is known as the physicist s notation, where the ordering of the functions is given by the electron indices. They may also be written in an alternative order with both functions depending on electron 1 on the left, and the functions depending on electron 2 on the right this is known as the Mulliken or chemist s notation. 

Yes, I know. Very confusing. But it s all just notation, and can be understood. In physicist s notation (equivalent to Dirac notation), tpitpjitpk tpi) refers to the two electron integral where and are functions of electron 1, while -j and ipi are functions of electron 2. Chemist s notation (with the square brackets []) places the functions of electron 1 on the left and the functions of... 

Here, hpq is a relativistic one-electron molecular spinor integral, and (pq rs) is a two-electron molecular spinor integral written in chemist s notation. The second quantized formulation is same as the nonrelativistic one when we use an excitation operator,... 

In Haitree-Fock-SIater theory it i.s common to refer to this manner of writing these integrals, with the coordinates ordered as in equation 5.32 as chemist s notation and so to identify each term in equation 5.3 over the spatial coordinates only in the form... 

The ERIs over contracted functions (in the so-called chemist s notation with square brackets, rather than in physicist s notation with angle brackets, (12 12) = [11 22]),... 

Conversion in both directions needs heuristic information about conjugation. It would therefore be more sensible to input molecules directly into the RAMSES notation. Ultimately, we hope that the chemist s perception of bonding will abandon the connection table representation of a single VB structure and switch to one accounting for the problems addressed in this section in a manner such as that laid down in the RAMSES model. 

An analogous equation holds for the spin-down Fock matrix. The two-electron integrals in round brackets are defined by chemist s (11122) rather than the usual physicist s (12112) notation as ... 

A Danish chemist, S. P. L. Sorensen, proposed a convenient notation for the hydrogen ion concentration of a solution. He defined the negative log of the hydrogen ion concentration as pH. 

Ure also published some gruesome experiments on the movements of a corpse exposed to galvanism, in the course of which several spectators ran out of the theatre and one gentleman fainted and on disinfection and quarantine, in which apparatus for producing chlorine gas is described. In the Dictionary of Chemistry (1821) Ure adopted Berzelius s notation and in the article on Equivalents showed discernment in dealing with contemporary theories. Dalton had a poor opinion of Ure as a chemist. 

Fortunately, from the chemist s point of view, such a Hamiltonian is not very useful. The chemist is not interested in each and every bit of information one can get about any N-electron M-nuclei system, however, she or he is focused on the given molecule, its conformations, interactions with the environment, and properties (spectroscopic, magnetic, electric, and so on). What makes quantum mechanics a valuable tool for chemists is the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, discussed in detail in the previous chapter of this volume. Let us briefly summarize it to maintain consistent notation throughout the chapter. 

Quantum chemists have devised efficient short-hand notation schemes to denote the basis set aseti in an ab initio calculation, although this does mean that a proliferation of abbrevia-liijii.s and acronyms are introduced. However, the codes are usually quite simple to under-sland. We shall concentrate on the notation used by Pople and co-workers in their Gaussian aerie-, of programs (see also the appendix to this chapter). 

In hydrations at ordinary temperatures (27) pure C S and P-C2S, corresponding to the aHte and beHte phases ia Pordand cements, respectively, react with water to form calcium hydroxide and a single calcium siHcate hydrate (C—S—H). Using cement chemists notation... 

Chemists use a special notation to specify the structure of electrode compartments in a galvanic cell. The two electrodes in the Daniell cell, for instance, are denoted Zn(s) Zn2+(aq) and Cu2+(aq) Cu(s). Each vertical line represents an interface between phases—in this case, between solid metal and ions in solution in the order reactant product. 

See William Whewell, "On the Employment of Notation in Chemistry," J. Royal Inst. 1 (1831) 437438 Alborn, "Negotiating Notation" W. H. Brock, "The British Association Committee on Chemical Symbols 1834 Edward Turner s Letter to British Chemists and a Reply by William Prout," Ambix 33 (1986) 3337. 

Perhaps critics of the chemists were understandably confused, since the formulas frequently were referred to as "constitutional" or "structural" formulas. (See fig. 5.) Frankland s use of the terms "graphic" and "glyptic" formulas is less misleading. This notation, he wrote, expresses the chemical function of atoms, and while some critics counsel the danger that students will regard them as representations of the actual physical position of atoms, Frankland reported that in practice he had not found "this evil to arise." 100... 

There is one more complication to the electron shells. Inside the shells themselves, electrons can be found in regions called orbitals. There are four types of orbitals—s, p, d, and/—and each has a specific shape. Blocks of the periodic table correspond to the different orbitals. The electrons in atoms of the first row of the table are found in the Is orbital. Helium, at the far right of the first row, consists of 2 electrons in the Is orbital. Neon, at the far right of the second row, has two electrons in the Is orbital, 2 electrons in the 2s orbital, and 6 electrons in the 2p orbital. These arrangements of electrons within orbitals are known as electron configurations. Chemists notate the electron configuration of helium as Is2 and neon as ls22s22p6. 

Information about an element s protons and neutrons is often summarized using the chemical notation shown in Figure 2.3. The letter X represents the atomic symbol for an element. (The atomic symbol is also called the element symbol.) Each element has a different atomic symbol. All chemists, throughout the world, use the same atomic symbols. Over the coming months, you will probably learn to recognize many of these symbols instantly. Appendix G, at the back of this book, lists the elements in alphabetical order, along with their symbols. You can also find the elements and their symbols in the periodic table on the inside back cover of this textbook, and in Appendix C. (You will review and extend your understanding of the periodic table, in section 2.2.)... 

Chemists use statements called equations to represent chemical reactions. Their equations show a reaction s reactants, which are the starting substances, and products, which are the substances formed during the reaction. Chemical equations do not express numerical equalities as do mathematical equations because during chemical reactions the reactants are used up as the products form. Instead, the equations used by chemists show the direction in which the reaction progresses. Therefore, an arrow rather than an equal sign is used to separate the reactants from the products. You read the arrow as react to produce or yield . The reactants are written to the arrow s left, and the products are written to its right. When there are two or more reactants, or two or more products, a plus sign separates each reactant or each product. These elements of equation notation are shown below. 

Three distinct types of information are presented (1) descriptions of chemicals, raw materials, processes, and equipment (2) expanded definitions of chemical entities, phenomena, and terminology and (3) descriptions or identifications of a wide range of trademarked products used in the chemical industries. Supplementing these are listings of accepted chemical abbreviations used in the literature, short biographies of chemists of historic importance, and winners of the Nobel prize in chemistry. Also included are descriptions or notations of the nature and location of many U.S. technical societies and trade associations. In special cases editorial notes have been supplied where it was felt necessary to clarify or amplify a definition or description. A few entries written by specialists are acknowledged by use of the author s name. 

---