Physical infinite dilution activity coefficients

The present review is, in a sense, a continuation of aU three aforementioned reviews. The thermodynamic aspects of hydrogen bonding (combinatorial approach) in pme fluids and their mixtures will be presented in a way that can be combined with any thermodynamic model. Here, it should become clear at the outset that, in general, hydrogen bonding makes a contribution only and is not sufficient for the complete evaluation of the various thermodynamic properties of fluids and their mixtures. Thus, hydrogen-bonding formalisms are usually combined with thermodynamic models, which account for all other contributions collectively called physical contributions. For the purposes of this chapter, we will use two kinds of thermodynamic frameworks equation-of-state theories (EoS) and predictive (infinite dilution) activity coefficient models. 

While at infinite dilutions only ion-solvent interactions occur and electrolyte solutions behave ideally, also at very low concentrations they deviate from ideality because of the electrostatic interaction energy of ions. Attractive forces between oppositely charged analytes lower the active concentration of each ionic species, because the attraction changes the way a given ion reacts chemically. Chemical laws are obeyed only if concentration is replaced by another physical quantity, the activity that is proportional to the concentration by a factor known as activity coefficient y. 

For solutes the standard state and the activity usually must be defined in terms of behavior under conditions of infinite dilution, where by definition the activity of a solute is set equal to its concentration. Thus at infinite dilution the ratio of activity to concentration (in whatever units) is unity, and y, = 1. When the value of some physical property of a solution is plotted as a function of concentration, a curve like those in Figure 2-2 is obtained. If the asymptote passing through the origin on the concentration scale is extrapolated to higher concentrations, we obtain the standard state of unit activity for the property in question. This hypothetical solution, labeled S, of unit concentration exhibits the same type of behavior as the infinitely dilute solution. The extent to which the real value of the physical property measured differs from the hypothetical value at a specific concentration is expressed by the activity coefficient, a coefficient that is simply the ratio between two measurable quantities. In Figure 2-2 the activity coefficient yj is the ratio BC/AC and is defined by... 

With the reference states defined earlier for the resin and solution phases, the activity coefficient ratio in the preceding equations should approach a constant value with increasing dilution of the external solution, and ultimately become unity with increasing dilution of both the resin and external phases. Intuitively, the latter condition would not be expected to hold since the reference state of infinite dilution for the exchanger is not compatible with the physical existence of a crosslinked ion exchanger. The observed result, which has been confirmed by a large number of researchers, is that the mean ionic activity coefficient of the absorbed electrolyte in the resin phase decreases with increasing dilution of the external electrolyte. 

It would be very convenient if it were possible to calculate activity coefficients for any molecule in any given environment. Unfortunately, few situations occur in which this is possible, and rarely do such situations appertain to real products. Thus, for example, we may estimate the activity coefficients of many alkanes and simple derivatives at infinite dilution in water, but the corresponding values for the same materials in a specific shower gel are not readily calculable from first principles. However, a large number of parameters are available in the literature and have been used to answer questions related to physical behaviour. 

Liquid-liquid system (LLC) The solute concentrations in both phases will be expressed in mole fractions, a hypothetical pure solute at infinite dilution in the solvent at the temperature and mean pressure of the system will be chosen as a standard concentration and standard physical state for the solute in both phases, and the activity coefficient of the solute in both phases will be normalized by the convention according to which y 1 as Xj - 0. The fugacities of the solute in the stationary and mobile phases are then /jg = Yis isJCjs and f,M = YiM iM- iM where is the activity coefficient characterizing the deviation from Henry s law, is the Henry law constant, and X is the molar fraction of the solute in a given phase. The standard fugacities (x" = l and y = 1) will then be fs = h,s and = By substituting from the above relations into equation 43 the relation... 

In physical chemistry, we apply the term coUigative to those properties that depend upon number of molecules present. The principal coUigative properties are boiling point elevation, freezing point depression, vapour pressure lowering, and osmotic pressure. All such methods require extrapolation of experimental data back, to infinite dilution. This arises due to the fact that the physical properties of any solute at a reasonable concentration in a solvent are determined not by the mole fraction of solute, but by the so-called activity of the solute. This takes a value less than the actual mole fraction, and is related to it by the activity coefficient ... 

In addition to matching bulk physical properties as already mentioned, it is also necessary to consider the activity coefficients to insure that the molecular interactions between the solutes and the solvent in the original and the substitute are generally similar. This insures that proposed substitute solvents will likely dissolve the same solutes and have similar effects to those of the original solvent. However, it is important to match only the activity coefBcients of the solutes in the solvents at in te dilution (zero solute concentration), so as not to include solute-solute interactions. The authors matched the activity coefficients at infinite dilution of a representative from six chemical families alcohols, ethers, ketones, water, normal alkanes, and aromatics, i.e., they have matched these activity coefficients in the solvent to be replaced to those in the replacement solvent. The particular components used are ethanol, diethyl ether, acetone, water, normal octane, and benzene. However, one could conceivably use different compounds successfully. Activity coefficients can be estimated from group contribution methods (77). 

Equation-of-state approaches are preferred concepts for a quantitative representation of polymer solution properties. They are able to correlate experimental VLE data over wide ranges of pressure and temperature and allow for physically meaningful extrapolation of experimental data into unmeasured regions of interest for application. Based on the experience of the author about the application of the COR equation-of-state model to many polymer-solvent systems, it is possible, for example, to measure some vapor pressures at temperatures between 50 and 100 C and concentrations between 50 and 80 wt% polymer by isopiestic sorption together with some infinite dilution data (limiting activity coefficients, Henry s constants) at temperatures between 100 and 200 C by IGC and then to calculate the complete vapor-liquid equilibrium region between room temperature and about 350 C, pressures between 0.1 mbar and 10 bar, and solvent concentration between the common polymer solution of about 75-95 wt% solvent and the ppm-region where the final solvent and/or monomer devolatilization process takes place. Equivalent results can be obtained with any other comparable equation of state model like PHC, SAFT, PHSC, etc. 

In Section 11.4, it was shown how suitable solvents can be selected with the help of powerful predictive thermodynamic models or direct access to the DDB using a sophisticated software package. A similar procedure for the selection of suitable solvents was also realized for other separation processes, such as physical absorption, extraction, solution crystallization, supercritical extraction, and so on. In the case of absorption processes or supercritical extraction instead of a g -model, for example, modified UNIFAC, of course an equation of state such as PSRK or VTPR has to be used. For the separation processes mentioned above instead of azeotropic data or activity coefficients at infinite dilution, now gas solubility data, liquid-liquid equilibrium data, distribution coefficients, solid-liquid equilibrium data or VLE data with supercritical compounds are required and can be accessed from the DDB. 

The tables in this volume refer to four physical quantities P - pressure, T- temperature, Xi - mole fraction of component 1 in liquid phase, and yi - mole fraction of component 1 in vapor phase. The pure component liquid molar volumes F) and the second molar virial coefficients B,y are auxiliary quantities used in calculating - the molar excess Gibbs energy, Gf- the partial molar excess Gibbs energies, and y/° - the activity coefficients at infinite dilution. They are all intensive quantities, i.e. flieir magnitudes are independent of the extent of the chemical system. 

---