Phenylurea urea method

Salts of primary aromatic amines react with a solution of urea to give the Corresponding arylureas, for example  

The mechanism of the reaction involves the intermediate formation of an amine cyanate (see previous Section) in aqueous solution urea behaves as an equilibrium mixture with ammonium cyanate  

Someapm.-diphenylurea is also formed and the quantity increases with continued refluxing  

The diarylurea is insoluble in boiling water and is therefore easily separated from the monoarylurea, which is readily soluble. The proportion of diarylurea is highest for aniline and decreases with substituted anilines. 

---

As yet, a number of experiments have failed to convert ureas 205 such as N-phenylurea or imidazolin-2-one by silylation amination with excess amines R3NHR4 such as benzylamine or morpholine and excess HMDS 2 as well as equivalent amounts of NH4X (for X=C1, I) via the silylated intermediates 206 and 207 in one reaction step at 110-150°C into their corresponding guanidines 208 with formation of NH3 and HMDSO 7 [35] (Scheme 4.13). This failure is possibly due to the steric repulsion of the two neighbouring bulky trimethylsilyl groups in the assumed activated intermediate 207, which prevents the formation of 207 in the equilibrium with 206. Thus the two step Rathke-method, which demands the prior S-alkylation of 2-thioureas followed by amination with liberation of alkyl-mercaptans, will remain one of the standard syntheses of guanidines [21, 35a,b,c]. 

Of the various published methods of preparing phenylurea, such as treatment of aniline salts with potassium cyanate in water solution,1 heating aniline with urea,2 with cyanic acid,3 or with cyanogen chloride,4 and the interaction of phenyl isocyanate or phenylcarbamine chloride with ammonia,5 the only ones to be considered as practical methods for preparation are the first two. The first suffers from the disadvantage that potassium cyanate is not easily prepared in the laboratory and rapidly undergoes spontaneous decomposition in storage while by the action of urea on aniline alone, carbanilide is formed in rather larger proportion than phenylurea. 

The preparation of l,l-dimethyl-3-phenylurea is typical of the experimental technique used for the preparation of ureas by this new method [53]. 

Several cleanup methods have been developed for the determination of urea pesticides, involving different basic procedures, such as liquid-liquid partition (30-32,34,36,37), steam distillation (31), and liquid-solid chromatography (9,30,32,34,36,38,56-58). Different factors, e.g., water solubility, ionic and polarity properties, thermal stability, and the molecular weight of the compounds, determine the choice of the cleanup method. Moreover, micro-cleanup procedures and online enrichment techniques have been introduced for the automated determination of phenylureas (60). Table 6 summarizes the use of the different cleanup procedures in the determination of urea pesticides. 

Volmer et al. studied phenylureas and sulfonylureas by TSP-LC-MS after sample concentration by Cjg SPE [175]. 15 phenylurea- and 1 thiourea pesticides besides 112 polar pesticides from other pesticide classes were examined by TSP ionisation, detection limits and TSP mass spectra of these polar compounds were presented [245], Besides other polar pesticides, the phenylurea pesticides isoproturon and diuron were on-line concentrated on a precolumn from several surface and drinking water samples and then determined by TSP-LC-MS [247]. A multi-residue TSP-LC-MS method was published by Moore et al. for the determination of the urea pesticides chlortoluron, diuron, isoproturon, and Unuron in water samples after Cig-SPE [248]. Ci8 Empore disks were applied to concentrate phenylureas from river water and spiked seawater samples prior to TSP-LC-MS. Detection limits of 2-20 (ig L and recoveries between 80 and 125% were observed [239]. TSP-LC-MS (SIM) in the positive mode allowed determination of the urea pesticides chlor-bromuron, diuron, linuron, metobromuron, monuron, neburon in apples, beans, lettuce, peppers, potatoes and tomatoes with detection limits of 0.025-1 ppm [255]. 20 other polar pesticides, linuron, which was under suspicion of being a dietary oncogenic risk (US Natl. Res. Council) was determined by TSP-LC-MS a single rapid procedure in vegetables with detection limits of 0.05-0.10 ppm [270]. TSP-LC-MS and ESI were used in a multi-residue method for determination of the sul-... 

---