Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Phase transitions limits

By combining the various observations obtained from the G-T diagrams in different P conditions, we can build up a P-P diagram plotting the stability fields of the various polymorphs, as shown in figure 2.5. The solid dots in figures 2.4 and 2.5 mark the phase transition limits and the triple point, and conform to the experimental results of Richardson et al. (1969) (A, R, B, C ) and Holdaway (1971) (A, H, B, C). The dashed zone defines the uncertainty field in the... [Pg.104]

For both first-order and continuous phase transitions, finite size shifts the transition and rounds it in some way. The shift for first-order transitions arises, crudely, because the chemical potential, like most other properties, has a finite-size correction p(A)-p(oo) C (l/A). An approximate expression for this was derived by Siepmann et al [134]. Therefore, the line of intersection of two chemical potential surfaces Pj(T,P) and pjj T,P) will shift, in general, by an amount 0 IN). The rounding is expected because the partition fiinction only has singularities (and hence produces discontinuous or divergent properties) in tlie limit i—>oo otherwise, it is analytic, so for finite Vthe discontinuities must be smoothed out in some way. The shift for continuous transitions arises because the transition happens when L for the finite system, but when i oo m the infinite system. The rounding happens for the same reason as it does for first-order phase transitions whatever the nature of the divergence in thennodynamic properties (described, typically, by critical exponents) it will be limited by the finite size of the system. [Pg.2266]

The number of examples of Uquid crystalline systems is limited. A simple discotic system, hexapentyloxytriphenylene (17) (Fig. 4), has been studied for its hole mobUity (24). These molecules show a crystalline to mesophase transition at 69°C and a mesophase to isotropic phase transition at 122°C (25). [Pg.409]

Fig. 2.12. If solids undergo a shock-induced polymorphic transformation, the volume change at the transformation causes significant changes in the wave profile produced by shock loading. In the figure, is the applied pressure, Pj is the pressure of the phase transition, and HEL is the Hugoniot elastic limit. Fig. 2.12. If solids undergo a shock-induced polymorphic transformation, the volume change at the transformation causes significant changes in the wave profile produced by shock loading. In the figure, is the applied pressure, Pj is the pressure of the phase transition, and HEL is the Hugoniot elastic limit.
With increasing values of P the molar volume is in progressively better agreement with the experimental values. Upon heating a phase transition takes place from the a phase to an orientationally disordered fee phase at the transition temperature where we find a jump in the molar volume (Fig. 6), the molecular energy, and in the order parameter. The transition temperature of our previous classical Monte Carlo study [290,291] is T = 42.5( 0.3) K, with increasing P, T is shifted to smaller values, and in the quantum limit we obtain = 38( 0.5) K, which represents a reduction of about 11% with respect to the classical value. [Pg.97]

Phase transitions in adsorbed layers often take place at low temperatures where quantum effects are important. A method suitable for the study of phase transitions in such systems is PIMC (see Sec. IV D). Next we study the gas-liquid transition of a model fluid with internal quantum states. The model [193,293-300] is intended to mimic an adsorbate in the limit of strong binding and small corrugation. No attempt is made to model any real adsorbate realistically. Despite the crudeness of the model, it has been shown by various previous investigations [193,297-300] that it captures the essential features also observed in real adsorbates. For example, the quite complex phase diagram of the model is in qualitative agreement with that of real substances. The Hamiltonian is given by... [Pg.98]

Pressure-induced phase transitions in the titanium dioxide system provide an understanding of crystal structure and mineral stability in planets interior and thus are of major geophysical interest. Moderate pressures transform either of the three stable polymorphs into the a-Pb02 (columbite)-type structure, while further pressure increase creates the monoclinic baddeleyite-type structure. Recent high-pressure studies indicate that columbite can be formed only within a limited range of pressures/temperatures, although it is a metastable phase that can be preserved unchanged for years after pressure release Combined Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction studies 6-8,10 ave established that rutile transforms to columbite structure at 10 GPa, while anatase and brookite transform to columbite at approximately 4-5 GPa. [Pg.19]

It should be realized that unlike the study of equilibrium thermodynamics for which a model is often mapped onto Ising system, elementary mechanism of atomic motion plays a deterministic role in the kinetic study. In an actual alloy system, diffusion of an atomic species is mainly driven by vacancy mechanism. The incorporation of the vacancy mechanism into PPM formalism, however, is not readily achieved, since the abundant freedom of microscopic path of atomic movement demands intractable number of variational parameters. The present study is, therefore, limited to a simple spin kinetics, known as Glauber dynamics [14] for which flipping events at fixed lattice points drive the phase transition. Hence, the present study for a spin system is regarded as a precursor to an alloy kinetics. The limitation of the model is critically examined and pointed out in the subsequent sections. [Pg.84]

The martensite - austenite transition temperatures we find are for all systems in accordance with the previously published ones . Some minor deviations can be attributed to the fact that we are simulating an overheated first order phase transition. Therefore, for our limited system sizes, one cannot expect a definite transition temperature. [Pg.97]

It is important to understand that critical behavior can only exist in the thermodynamic limit that is, only in the limit as the size of the system N —> = oo. Were we to examine the analytical behavior of any observables (internal energy, specific heat, etc) for a finite system, we would generally find no evidence of any phase transitions. Since, on physical grounds, we expect the free energy to be proportional to the size of the system, we can compute the free energy per site f H, T) (compare to equation 7.3)... [Pg.333]

Ri does not show any phase transition. This should not be terribly surprising, since, in the deterministic limit, Ri exhibits either class 2 behavior (i.e. periodicity) or class 4 behavior (spatially separated propagating structures with an ill-defined statistical limit). The density p therefore has no well-defined statistical mean for p = 1 and the periodicity and/or propagating structures are rapidly destroyed (and thus p — 0) whenever p < 1. Moreover, from the above mean-field... [Pg.357]

However intuitive the edge-of-chaos idea appears to be, one shoidd be aware that it has received a fair amount of criticism in recent years. It is not clear, for example, how to even define complexity in more complicated systems like coevolutionary systems, much less imagine a phase transition between diffen ent complexity regimes. Even Langton s sugge.stion that effective computation within the limited domain of cellular automata can take place only in the transition region has been challenged. ... [Pg.564]

With increasing water content the reversed micelles change via swollen micelles 62) into a lamellar crystalline phase, because only a limited number of water molecules may be entrapped in a reversed micelle at a distinct surfactant concentration. Tama-mushi and Watanabe 62) have studied the formation of reversed micelles and the transition into liquid crystalline structures under thermodynamic and kinetic aspects for AOT/isooctane/water at 25 °C. According to the phase-diagram, liquid crystalline phases occur above 50—60% H20. The temperature dependence of these phase transitions have been studied by Kunieda and Shinoda 63). [Pg.8]

The uncertainties in the condensed-phase thermodynamic functions arise from (1) the possible existence of a solid-solid phase transition in the temperature range 2160 to 2370 K and (2) the uncertainty in the estimated value of the liquid heat capacity which is on the order of 40%. While these uncertainties affect the partial pressures of plutonium oxides by a factor of 10 at 4000 K, they are not limiting because, at that temperature, the total pressure is due essentially entirely to O2 and 0. [Pg.143]

It is clear that systems of hard ellipsoids exhibit an intriguingly simple phase behaviour with some resemblance to that of real nematogens. However, such systems cannot form smectic or columnar phases and in addition the phase transitions are not thermally driven as they are for real mesogens. As we shall see in the following sections the Gay-Berne potential with its anisotropic repulsive and attractive forces is able to overcome both of these limitations. [Pg.81]

In 1978, Bryan [11] reported on crystal structure precursors of liquid crystalline phases and their implications for the molecular arrangement in the mesophase. In this work he presented classical nematogenic precursors, where the molecules in the crystalline state form imbricated packing, and non-classical ones with cross-sheet structures. The crystalline-nematic phase transition was called displacive. The displacive type of transition involves comparatively limited displacements of the molecules from the positions which they occupy with respect to their nearest neighbours in the crystal. In most cases, smectic precursors form layered structures. The crystalline-smectic phase transition was called reconstitutive because the molecular arrangement in the crystalline state must alter in a more pronounced fashion in order to achieve the mesophase arrangement [12]. [Pg.141]

The previous ELP fusions all are examples of protein purification in which the ELP is covalently connected to the protein of choice. This approach is suitable for the purification of recombinant proteins that are expressed to high levels, but at very low concentrations of ELP the recovery becomes limited. Therefore this approach is not applicable for proteins expressed at micrograms per liter of bacterial culture, such as toxic proteins and complex multidomain proteins. An adjusted variant of ITC was designed to solve this problem. This variant makes use of coaggregation of free ELPs with ELP fusion proteins. In this coaggregation process, an excess of free ELP is added to a cell lysate to induce the phase transition at low concentrations of... [Pg.82]

Elevation of boiling point and depression of freezing point of the solution. Within certain limits, the change in temperature of these phase transitions obeys the eqnation... [Pg.100]


See other pages where Phase transitions limits is mentioned: [Pg.247]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.2266]    [Pg.2364]    [Pg.2370]    [Pg.2913]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.632]    [Pg.685]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.648]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.966]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.5 , Pg.6 , Pg.7 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info