Phase separation morphological features

Mechanical properties of mbber-modifted epoxy resins depend on the extent of mbber-phase separation and on the morphological features of the mbber phase. Dissolved mbber causes plastic deformation and necking at low strains, but does not result in impact toughening. The presence of mbber particles is a necessary but not sufficient condition for achieving impact resistance. Optimum properties are obtained with materials comprising both dissolved and phase-separated mbber (305). 

Most multicomponent systems undergo phase separation because of their positive mixing enthalpies coupled with low entropy of mixing. Morphological features have been central to the study of multicomponent systems, because domain sizes, shapes, and interfacial bonding characteristics determine the mechanical properties. A proper understanding of these features often allow synergistic behavior to be developed. 

Even though TEM and SEM played major roles in the study of IPN morphological features, there are various shortcomings, such as staining artifacts, difficulties in sample preparation for very rubbery materials, and the two-dimensional viewing limit for the former. Recently, various scattering techniques have been applied to measure the phase dimensions of IPN s via statistical treatment. The principles of neutron scattering theory as applied to the phase separated materials have been described in a number of papers and review articles [33-36]. 

Immiscibility of polymers in the melt is a common phenomenon, typically leading to a two-phase random morphology. If the phase separation occurs by a spinodal decomposition process, it is possible to control the kinetics in a manner that leads to multiphase polymeric materials with a variety of co-continuous structures. Common morphologies of polymer blends include droplet, fiber, lamellar (layered) and co-continuous microstructures. The distinguishing feature of co-continuous morphologies is the mutual interpenetration of the two phases and an image analysis technique using TEM has been described for co-continuous evaluation.25... 

This article reviews the phase behavior of polymer blends with special emphasis on blends of random copolymers. Thermodynamic issues are considered and then experimental results on miscibility and phase separation are summarized. Section 3 deals with characteristic features of both the liquid-liquid phase separation process and the reverse phenomenon of phase dissolution in blends. This also involves morphology control by definite phase decomposition. In Sect. 4 attention will be focused on flow-induced phase changes in polymer blends. Experimental results and theoretical approaches are outlined. 

In contrast to natural structures the morphological features of structures in fabricated foods are in principle within our control. The source of the many structures of foods, even those made from a single raw material (e.g., wheat flour), lies in the ingredient mix and the fact that thermodynamic equilibrium is practically never required or achieved during processing. These metastable structures can be attained because they are favored kinetically, that is, the approach to equilibrium is slow. At any point during the development of a particular structure a process of shape stabilization sets in, usually by vitrification, partial crystallization, phase separation and/or formation of a network (Figure 12.5). 

It has been noted above that phase separation in thermoplastics is a common occurrence when two or more polymers are mixed and that miscibility is the uncommon event. This is exploited in toughening of thermosets by elastomers when phase separation occurs during the reaction that leads to three-dimensional network formation. If macroscopic phase separation is not desired then it is possible to achieve a different microscopic morphology and in some cases maintain some features of miscibility... 

Another striking experimental feature is that the attractions do not appear to lead to macroscopic phase separation. In this sense, the counterion-mediated attraction between the chains appears to have a different character from ordinary attractions that lead simply to phase separation at sufficiently high concentrations. Instead, the chains tend to form dense bundles of a fairly well-defined thickness [8,11]. The precise morphology of the bundles appears to depend sensitively on the persistence length of the polyelectrolyte, the chain length, and the concentration. In the case of dilute DNA, the bundles tend to be toroidal or rod-shaped. Other stiff polyelectrolytes tend to form rodlike bundles or networks of bundles. In each case, however, there is a well-defined cross-sectional thickness for the bundles. We will concentrate on the question of why there is a characteristic cross-sectional bundle diameter, rather than on the specific morphology of the bundles. 

---