Phase pressure effect

For the liquid-phase mass-transfer coefficient /cl, the effects of total system pressure can be ignored for all practical purposes. Thus, when using Kq and /cl for the design of gas absorbers or strippers, the primary pressure effects to consider will be those which affect the equilibrium curves and the values of m. If the pressure changes affect the hydrodynamics, then Icq, and a can all change significantly. 

Fair s method may also be modified to design forced-recirculation reboilers with horizontal tubes. In this case the hydrostatic-head-pressure effect through the tubes is zero but must be considered in the two-phase return Tines to the column. 

The ambiguity of the total pressure effect can be seen by a comparison of the gas-phase- and liquid-phase-controlled cases when the gas phase controls, the liquid-phase resistance is negligible and Kg( = K npf is independent of the total pressure. For this case the coefficient K g< is inversely proportional to the total system pressure as shown in Eq. (14-66). On the other hand, when the liquid phase controls, the correct equation is... 

Nonisothermal hquid-phase processes may be driven by changes in feed temperature or heat addition or withdrawal through a column wall. For these, heats of adsorption and pressure effects are generally of less concern. For this case a suitable energy balance is... 

Liquids have relatively low compressibility compared with gases and, thus, the mobile phase velocity is sensibly constant throughout the column. As a consequence, elution volumes measured at the column exit can be used to obtain retention volume data and, unless extreme accuracy is required for special applications, there is no need for the retention volume to be corrected for pressure effects. 

This metliod calculates the dry tray pressure drop and allows for correcting the two-phase flow effects at various entrainment ratios. 

For hydrocarbons in high-pressure fractionators Strigle [82] reports there is aeration of the rather low surface tension liquid phase. This effect increases with the lower surface tension and as the vapor density increases, thus... 

P(p = average density, lb/ft , two phase tj) = effective average (two-phase)/liquid phase pressure drop ratio corresponding to effective average vaporization x... 

When we consider equilibrium between two phases at high pressure, neither phase being dilute with respect to one of the components, we can no longer make the simplifying assumptions made in some of the earlier sections. We must now realistically describe deviations from ideal behavior in both phases for each phase, the effect of both pressure and composition must be seriously taken into account if we wish to describe vapor-liquid equilibria at high pressures for a wide range of conditions, including the critical. 

Probably the most widely used method for estimating the drop in pressure due to friction is that proposed by LOCKHART and Martinelli(,5) and later modified by Chisholm(,8 . This is based on the physical model of separated flow in which each phase is considered separately and then a combined effect formulated. The two-phase pressure drop due to friction — APtpf is taken as the pressure drop — AP/, or — APG that would arise for either phase flowing alone in the pipe at the stated rate, multiplied by some factor 2L or . This factor is presented as a function of the ratio of the individual single-phase pressure drops and ... 

The effect of various parameters on the difference between vapor and liquid pressure is illustrated in Figs. 8.3 and 8.4. The effect of the Fuler and Weber numbers as well as the thermal parameter is highly noticeable. An increase in Fu, We and d- leads to a decrease in AP, whereas the difference of both phase pressures is practically independent of Reynolds number. An increase in the Froude number is accompanied by an increase in AP for a small Fr. At Fr > 10 the effect of Fr on AP is negligible. 

The temperature distribution has a characteristic maximum within the liquid domain, which is located in the vicinity of the evaporation front. Such a maximum results from two opposite factors (1) heat transfer from the hot wall to the liquid, and (2) heat removal due to the liquid evaporation at the evaporation front. The pressure drops monotonically in both domains and there is a pressure jump at the evaporation front due to the surface tension and phase change effect on the liquid-vapor interface. 

In view of the above developments, it is now possible to formulate theories of the complex phase behavior and critical phenomena that one observes in stractured continua. Furthermore, there is currently little data on the transport properties, rheological characteristics, and thermomechaiucal properties of such materials, but the thermodynamics and dynamics of these materials subject to long-range interparticle interactions (e.g., disjoiiung pressure effects, phase separation, and viscoelastic behavior) can now be approached systematically. Such studies will lead to sigiuficant intellectual and practical advances. 

At extreme pressures, liquid-phase reactions exhibit pressure effects. A suggested means for correlation is the activation volume, A Vaco Thus,... 

Redispersion of gas compensates for coalescence and pressure effects negligible depletion of the reactive component or else a high level of inerts are present in the gas phase... 

Conventionally, the sample is initially saturated with one fluid phase, perhaps including the other phase at the irreducible saturation. The second fluid phase is injected at a constant flow rate. The pressure drop and cumulative production are measured. A relatively high flow velocity is used to try to negate capillary pressure effects, so as to simplify the associated estimation problem. However, as relative permeability functions depend on capillary number, these functions should be determined under the conditions characteristic of reservoir or aquifer conditions [33]. Under these conditions, capillary pressure effects are important, and should be included within the mathematical model of the experiment used to obtain property estimates. 

Cumo et al. (1969) reported that the pressure effect on the bubble diameter is linear in a Freon-114 flow, as shown in Figure 5.43. They tested the two-phase Freon-114 flow in a vertical rectangular test section at a mass flux of 100 g/cm2 s (0.737 x 106 lb/ft2 hr). The average bubble diameters at various system pressures were obtained from high-speed photographic recordings. The effect of reduced pressure, p pci, on the average diameter of Freon bubbles is correlated as... 

Lockhart and Martinelli divided gas-liquid flows into four cases (1) laminar gas-laminar liquid (2) turbulent gas-laminar liquid (3) laminar gas-turbulent liquid and (4) turbulent gas-turbulent liquid. They measured two-phase pressure drops and correlated the value of 0g with parameter % for each case. The authors presented a plot of acceleration effects, incompressible flow (3) no interaction at the interface and (4) the pressure drop in the gas phase equals the pressure drop in the liquid phase. 

---