Peptide synthesis classical solution method

The major disadvantage of solid-phase peptide synthesis is the fact that ail the by-products attached to the resin can only be removed at the final stages of synthesis. Another problem is the relatively low local concentration of peptide which can be obtained on the polymer, and this limits the turnover of all other educts. Preparation of large quantities (> 1 g) is therefore difficult. Thirdly, the racemization-safe methods for acid activation, e.g. with azides, are too mild (= slow) for solid-phase synthesis. For these reasons the convenient Menifield procedures are quite generally used for syntheses of small peptides, whereas for larger polypeptides many research groups adhere to classic solution methods and purification after each condensation step (F.M. Finn, 1976). 

Initially, the term Hquid-phase synthesis was used to contrast the differences between soHd-phase peptide synthesis and a method of synthesis on soluble polyethylene glycol (PEG) [5, 6]. Although soluble polymer-supported synthesis is less ambiguous than Hquid-phase synthesis, the latter term is more prevalent in the Hterature. In-keeping with previous reviews [7-12], the phrases classical or solution synthesis will be used to describe homogeneous reaction schemes that do not employ polymer supports while liquid-phase synthesis will be reserved... 

Three methodologies are compared the classical solution method, the Merrifield approach and an automated (the "mediatcontinuous monitoring. The utilization of PRs as general acyl transfer reagents is also elaborated. ITie described approaches are not limited to peptide synthesis, but may be applicable to a wide range of organic reaction types. 

We have shown that upon applying our approach to the synthesis of soluble protected peptide intermediates, very hi yields per coupling step were obtained as compared to the classical solution methods. While it is commonly accepted that on using the standard solution synthetic mediod the average yield per coupling step is... 

The four-component condensation of isocyanides (also called isonitriles), discovered by Ugi in the late 1950s (Ugi four component reaction, Ugi-4CR) [176], provides another alternative to the classical methods of peptide synthesis in solution [177-180], The Ugi-4CR has been extensively studied in every conceivable aspect and several variants of the general scheme give different products. In one variant that is particularly relevant to the topic of this article, an N-protected peptide or amino acid, a chiral primary amine, an aldehyde and an isonitrile peptide fragment are combined to yield, via a spontaneous rearrangement of an unstable a-adduct, a compound 74 in which a new peptide segment has formed (Scheme 5.38, see also Section 5.4.1 above for an application of Ugi-4CRto PNA synthesis). 

Peptide synthesis in solution according to the classical method involves three steps, namdy the coupling of the first two amino acids, deavage of the protecting group of the amino function, and the next coupling step. If polymer supports are us two additional steps are required one is the attachment of the first amino add of the peptide s uence to the polymer and the other is the cleavage of the peptide from the polymer support. 

There are two general approaches to the synthesis of peptides the classical method, in which all reactions are carried out in homogeneous solution, and the solid phase method, in which the reactions are heterogeneous ones between soluble reagents and an insoluble peptide chain that is attached to a solid support. Since its introduction by Merrifield in 1962 solid-phase peptide synthesis has been applied successfully to the preparation of a great number and variety of peptides including proteins [1,2]. 

The classical chemical peptide synthesis is a synthesis in a homogeneous solution t41 46l. Even in the 1950s this approach had started to gain industrial importance followed by the solid-phase technique in the early 1960s, invented by the Nobel laureate Bruce Merrifieldl47-501. The most fundamental time-consuming operations in chemical peptide synthesis (sometimes not free from undesirable side reactions) are the selective protection, and after synthesis the deprotection of the a-amino function, the carboxyl group and the various side chain functionalities of trifunctional amino acids. Despite the development of numerous efficient protection methods based on chemical techniques, the whole process is rather slow as all intermediate products have to be purified and characterized after each reaction step. The formation of each peptide bond requires the activation of the carboxylic acid function of the carboxyl moiety. 

Merrifield s invention of solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) revolutionized the field of peptide chemistry [1]. Prior to the development of SPPS, peptides were synthesized via classical solution-phase methods, which are customarily quite tedious and time consuming, and require considerable expertise... 

Our research utilizing chemical synthesis of repeating peptide sequences is represented in over 170 scientific publications. It utilized classic solution synthesis and to a much lesser extent solid phase methods. The primary focus in all cases has been development of an understanding relevant to structure, function, and mechanism rather than development of synthetic methodologies, although some of the latter did indeed occur principally due to the expert capacities of T. Ohnishi, K. Okamoto, R. Rapaka, K.U. Prasad, T.P. Parker, and D.C. Gowda. Here we note a few issues relevant to the production of protein-based polymers, that is, of polymers composed of repeating peptide sequences. 

---