Peel test strength tests

The usual practical situation is that in which two solids are bonded by means of some kind of glue or cement. A relatively complex joint is illustrated in Fig. XII-14. The strength of a joint may be measured in various ways. A common standard method is the peel test in which the normal force to separate the joint... 

Fig. 1, Schematic of commonly u.sed methods for testing the strength of adhesive joints, (a) Peel test. Note that the peel angle can be changed depending on the test requirements, (b) Double overlap shear test. In this test, the failure is predominantly mode II. (c) Single overlap shear test. In this test the failure mode is mixture of mode I and mode II. (d) Blister test.

Fig. 17. Adhesion energy G measured as a function of the surface density of the interfacial chains. It may noted that the strength measured in a peel test (a) is about 5 times larger than that measured using the JKR method (b). Further, a maximum exists in the value of G as function of the surface chain density. This is because of swelling effects at larger values of surface chain density. The open symbols represent the data for elastomer molecular weight Mo = 24,000 and the closed symbols represent the data for Mo = 10,000.

Adhesive strength refers to the bond produced by contact of an adhesive to a surface. It used to be measured by peeling tests. This ultimate strength depends on temperature, applied pressure and time of contact. 

Table 1 contains the metal-to-metal engineering property requirements for Boeing Material Specification (BMS) 5-101, a structural film adhesive for metal to metal and honeycomb sandwich use in areas with normal temperature exposure. The requirements are dominated by shear strength tests. Shear strength is the most critical engineering property for structural adhesives, at least for the simplistic joint analysis that is commonly used for metal-to-metal secondary structure on commercial aircraft. Adhesive Joints are purposefully loaded primarily in shear as opposed to tension or peel modes as adhesives are typically stronger in shear than in Mode I (load normal to the plane of the bond) loading. 

Both static and dynamic tests are employed to evaluate the adhesion strength of cord-mbber composites. The major static tests used in tire industry are H-adhesion, 90/180° peel test, tire cord adhesion test (TCAT) and co-axial shear pull-out test (CSPT). Although these methods are... 

Peel Strength. Samples were prepared by cutting 2.5" (63.5 mm) wide radial sections, bead to bead. The sample was then sectioned into two 1.25" (31.75 mm) radial strips, which were each cut circumferentially at the centerline of the tread resulting in four test specimens (2-SS and 2-OSS). Each sample was cut with a razor knife for a length of 1" (25.4 mm) from the skim end of the test strip, midway between the belts, to facilitate gripping the ends in the T-2000 stress-strain tester jaws. The sides of each specimen were scored midway between the belts, to a depth of 1/8" (3.175 mm) radially from the end of the gripping surface to the end of belt 2 in the shoulder area, providing a 1" wide peel section. The peel test was performed at 2"/min (50.8 mm/min) at 24°C. 

The interaction of two substrates, the bond strength of adhesives are frequently measured by the peel test [76]. The results can often be related to the reversible work of adhesion. Due to its physical nature such a measurement is impossible to carry out for particulate filled polymers. Even interfacial shear strength widely applied for the characterization of matrix/fiber adhesion cannot be used in particulate filled polymers. Interfacial adhesion of the components is usually deduced indirectly from the mechanical properties of composites with the help of models describing composition dependence. Such models must also take into account interfacial interactions. 

In the literature, there are several reports that examine the role of conventional fillers like carbon black on the autohesive tack (uncured adhesion between a similar pair of elastomers) [225]. It has been shown that the incorporation of carbon black at very high concentration (>30 phr) can increase the autohesive tack of natural and butyl rubber [225]. Very recently, for the first time, Kumar et al. [164] reported the effect of NA nanoclay (at relatively very low concentration) on the autohesive tack of BIMS rubber by a 180° peel test. XRD and AFM show intercalated morphology of nanoclay in the BIMS rubber matrix. However, the autohesive tack strength dramatically increases with nanoclay concentration up to 8 phr, beyond which it apparently reaches a plateau at 16 phr of nanoclay concentration (see Fig. 36). For example, the tack strength of 16 phr of nanoclay-loaded sample is nearly 158% higher than the tack strength of neat BIMS rubber. The force versus, distance curves from the peel tests for selected samples are shown in Fig. 37. 

When using peel tests on such products as belts to separate the plies, it can be difficult to obtain interfacial failure. Loha et al47 successfully used test pieces including a perforated metal sheet at the interface to measure rubber to rubber adhesion strength. 

Figure 6. Influence of EME co-polymer coupling agent mercaptoester unit concentation on (a) the dry peel strength and (b) the time in 57 C water until the presence of visible corrosion products was observed for epoxy/steel peel test panels. From ref. 6.

Figure 10. Peel strength durability in a 5TC condensing humidity of acetone-degreased and EME 67 (67 wt% mercaptoester unit copolymer) coupling agent treated 1010 carbon steel/epoxy peel test panels. The epoxy top-coat formulation is given in Appendix 4.

Peel strength by 90° peel test on 5 mm wide strips at a rate of 5 mm/min, as per ASTM D-903-49-1978. 

Adhesion strength of polymeric coatings using 180° peel test... 

---