Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Peak difference plot

The even spacing is dramatically revealed by the "Peak Difference Plot" shown in Figure 6. This was developed by plotting differences between significant clusterings or gaps in 22 Peak Number Plots based on both human and insect evaluations, and counting the number of such differences in each 3 cm- interval. [Pg.132]

Figure 6. The Peak difference plot is derived in the same way as the Peak number... Figure 6. The Peak difference plot is derived in the same way as the Peak number...
Figure 7 shows the results for the corrected peak area plotted against injection time for the HC, LC, and non-HC and LC species called non-main species. The corrected peak area values are used because they compensate for velocity differences between species of different molecular size as they pass through the detector. These results demonstrate that the reduced CE-SDS method has a wide injection linearity range (5—40 s at —5kV) for the HC, LC, and non-main species. [Pg.364]

The difference plot for the second mutation shows two things first, the negative peak at residue 3 0 indicates a des tabilizing mutation, and second, the other peaks show that this mutation also affects long-range interactions. [Pg.166]

In recent years the application of electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry, quadrupole time-of-flight (QqTOF) mass spectrometry, and Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) are used for further structural characterization of DOM (Kujawinski et al., 2002 Kim et al., 2003 Stenson et al., 2003 Koch et al., 2005 Tremblay et al., 2007 Reemtsma et al., 2008). MS/MS capabilities provide the screening for selected ions, and FT-ICR allows exact molecular formula determination for selected peaks. In addition, SEC can be coupled to ESI and FTICR-MS to study different DOM fractions. Homologous series of structures can be revealed, and many pairs of peaks differ by the exact masses of -H2, -O, or -CH2. Several thousand molecular formulas in the mass range of up to more than 600 Da can be identified and reproduced in element ratio plots (O/C versus H/C plots). Limitations of ESI used by SEC-MS are shown by These and Reemtsma (2003). [Pg.384]

Profile and difference plot for Na-A zeolite at 603 K. The short vertical markers below the pattern represent allowed reflections. Background intensities were about 400 at 9°, 300 at 14°, 200 at 24°, 100 at 45° and 50 at 100°. Small regions in the vicinity of 61°, 72° and 1110 were excluded because of overlap with A1 peaks from the sample holder. [Pg.154]

For example, a 21-mer oligonucleotide specific sequence for Chlamydia trachomatis [33] was immobilized onto a carbon screen-printed electrode surface. The daunomycin signal for the different concentrations of the target sequence is shown in Fig. 5a the increasing area of the daunomycin peak is plotted as a function of the complementary oligonucleotide concentration. [Pg.37]

The structures of the a and P forms remain somewhat enigmatic (Paulus el al. 1989), at least in the open literature. Leusen (1996) has claimed that computational methods for generating possible structures and subsequent comparison with X-ray powder diffraction patterns have been used to produce all three of the quinacridone structures, in the correct stability order. However, details are still to be published (Leusen et al. 1996). Lincke and Finzel (1996) published a proposed structure of the a-form from a powder pattern that was computed by generating the structure by perturbing the known y structure (Potts et al. 1994). However, the rather high R-factor (20.6 per cent) and the presence of quite a few peaks on the final difference plot, raise some doubts as to the correctness of this proposed structure. [Pg.263]

Modem pRS systems are accompanied with powerful spectral acquisition and analysis software, which enables the creation of ID (cross section), 2D, and 3D maps of various features from the ID, 2D, or 3D array of spatially resolved Raman spectra. Various features that can be routinely mapped include intensity variations of specific peaks (by plotting the user-defined peak intensity or integrated area under the peak), intensity ratio of two different bands, peak position (by user-defined peak fitting routines such as Gaussian, Lorentzian), and peak widths. The obtained images can be further processed to highlight the spatial variations of the acquired spectra. For example. Boolean maps, which present a binary... [Pg.419]

As indicated in Figure 4.9, one strong peak in the middle (around 36.3°) had been overlooked during the automatic search. Its absence is easily detected from the analysis of the difference plot. The peak was included into the next step and the result is shown in Figure 4.10. [Pg.364]

The difference plots in Figure 4.11 and Figure 4.12 point to the presence of two broad peaks near 35 and 41° 20. The overall improvement after these peaks were included in the fit is shown in Figure 4.13. We note that absolute differences between the observed and calculated profiles in the vicinities of strong reflections are usually greater when compared to those in the background and weak peaks regions. However, relative variances (AYi/Y,) do not differ substantially. [Pg.366]

Figure 6.40. The observed (circles) and calculated (lines) intensities in a fragment of powder diffraction pattern of GdsSi4. The calculated intensity has been normalized to match the observed profile. Peak shape, background and lattice parameters employed to compute the calculated profile have been obtained by a full pattern decomposition of the observed data using Le Bail s technique, as shown in Figure 6.39. Note, that the difference plot has been compressed ten-fold for clarity. Figure 6.40. The observed (circles) and calculated (lines) intensities in a fragment of powder diffraction pattern of GdsSi4. The calculated intensity has been normalized to match the observed profile. Peak shape, background and lattice parameters employed to compute the calculated profile have been obtained by a full pattern decomposition of the observed data using Le Bail s technique, as shown in Figure 6.39. Note, that the difference plot has been compressed ten-fold for clarity.
To separate kinetic and resistive effects, one can perform experiments at variable scan rate and at different concentrations of electroactive species. As a result, the peak potential separation increases on increasing v and the concentration of the depolarizer, allowing for estimation of the uncompensated resistance from the slope of the peak potential separation versus peak current plot for different analyte concentrations at a given potential scan rate (DuVall and McGreery, 1999, 2000) using the relationship ... [Pg.17]

Note that differences between the positions of the peaks in the peak number plots are plotted as dots, and the number of dots appearing in each 3-cm interval are counted and plotted. The striking periodicity thereby revealed is interpreted as showing that the frequency sensitivities of the various biological receptors are evenly spaced. [Pg.133]

To demonstrate the increased level of detail that is available because parent molecules can be detected without fragmentation for individual (k, 1) combinations, we have plotted the relative abimdances in a different way. Figure 11.11 shows relative peak integrals plotted in a grid of k and 1. [Pg.550]

Measurements at different heating rates may lead to different amounts of instrument-lag, i.e., the temperature marked on the DSC trace can only be compared to a calibration of equal heating rate and baseline deflection. A simple lag correction makes use of the slope of the indium melting peak when plotted vs. sample temperature as a correction to vertical lines on the temperature axis, hi some commercial DSCs this lag correction is included in the analysis program. It must be considered, however, that different samples have different thermal conductivities and thermal resistances so that different lags are produced as shown, for example, in Fig. 4.94, for an analysis with TMDSC. [Pg.340]

There is an issue as to how sugar concentration is expressed. If it is expressed relative to a fixed starch/water ratio, then the sugar may exert its effect by competing for the water in a non-ideal way. Consequently, different plots may produce different conclusions [16]. In a thorough examination of this issue [17], it was concluded that sugars, on keeping the total solid/liquid ratio constant, increase both the onset and the peak temperatures but have little effect on the end temperature. Hence, they sharpen the transition. [Pg.339]


See other pages where Peak difference plot is mentioned: [Pg.133]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.686]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.519]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.1930]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.133 ]




SEARCH



Difference plots

Peak difference

© 2024 chempedia.info