Party Resolutions

Acceptance or rejection of action items—right of review by each party, resolution of disagreements... 

Within the domain of VAPP/RAPP, a fundamental principle was established the complete dependence of the literary field on the field of power. This was sanctioned by a 1925 Party resolution, its publication affirming the Party s first open interference in the artistic field. The tribunes from which this document was issued were the most peremptory Party voices Pravda (Truth), on i July i 1925, and Izvestiia (News), in no. 25-26, 1925. The resolution resulted from a request made by the proletarian journal Na postu, clamouring for more Party support and for a dominant position for proletarian writers in Soviet cultural life. The Party answered by refnsing to ally itself with any specific group but the publication of a document concerning literary politics was a political act that started a new chapter in Soviet cultural life, which would thereafter see the Party as a main source of creative inspiration. 

Party resolutions, they were also featuring extracts of the First Congress of the Union of Soviet Writers, thus consolidating the aesthetic of Socialist Realism. 

Incident Investigation Major incidents Near-miss reporting Follow-up and resolution Communication Incident recording Third-party participation as needed... 

Protocol. In 1997, prior to President Clinton s acceptance of the Kyoto Protocol, U.S. Senate Resolution 98, the Byrd-Hcgcl resolution, which was passed by a vote of ninety-five to zero, imposes specific requirements that must be met before the Kyoto Protocol can be ratified. The resolution calls for a specific timeline and commitments by developing countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and evidence that adoption of the Kyoto Protocol would not result in serious harm to the U.S. economy. In addition, the Fifth Conference of the Parties (1999) failed to resolve numerous outstanding issues held over from the previous conference, and put off critical decision making until the Sixth Conference of the Parties in The Ffague, Netherlands, in November 2000. 

Incident Investigation—In assessing this element, consideration must be given to major incidents, near-miss reporting, follow-up and resolution, communications, incident recording, and third-party participation as needed. 

The laboratory shall have a policy and procedure for the resolution of complaints received from clients or other parties. Records shall be maintained of all complaints and of the investigations and corrective actions taken by the laboratory. The laboratory shall have a policy and procedmes that shall be implemented when any aspect of its testing and/or calibration work, or the results of this work, do not coirform to "... 

Reinforcing your resolution to achieve your purpose, for example, talking with like-minded people, giving presentations about your project to interested parties, exuding enthusiasm for what you are doing - all steps that will help you sustain your traction . 

The constructive ambiguities in Annex 2C may be definitively settled only under the AUSFTA dispute resolution chapter 21, by an unelected panel of three nominated trade lawyers (Article 21.7). Perhaps of great importance for the PBS in this context is Article 21.2(c). This is what is known in international trade law as an NVNB clause. NVNB provisions allow dispute resolution proceedings to be commenced where only the "spirit" of the treaty had been broken or, more technically, the "legitimate expectations" have been nullified or impaired (no technical violation) by a "measure" of the other party. 

After perceptual convergence on this second party s view, a series of questions can then be asked to identify the differences between the two individuals. This series can be followed by a series of more specific questions to see whether there is any room for maneuver or compromise. The progression from open-ended, to confinnatory, to increasingly directed questions moves the parties from conflict toward points of agreement and possible compromise, and closer to the resolution of the conflict. If the conflict cannot be resolved, at least the parties will know that it was not for lack of understanding but rather because of truly irreconcilable differences. 

According to the Directive Art. 21 No. 2, a competent authority shall be appointed to achieve a rapid resolution of disputes arising between undertakings in connection with negotiations for third party access. Disputes on denial of access are especially mentioned. The authority shall be independent of the parties . Member States can make use of existing bodies, for instance, competition authorities or national courts.11 However, if the State in question is an important player in the gas market, the demand for impartiality indicates that the dispute authority shall be administratively independent of the state authorities. 

If any subsection of the data documentation (Section 2) is incomplete or if any deviation from the listed acceptance criteria is deemed unacceptable by the signatories, then this document cannot be approved. If it cannot be approved, timely activity closure is recommended and will require that all outstanding issues are resolved to the satisfaction of the quality representative or document termination with a cover note explaining the reasons for the termination. In either case, the parties who approved the unexecuted protocol must approve the resolution and/or the termination. Approval of all protocol explanations is required prior to the approval of a revised protocol generated to accomplish similar objectives. 

Inevitably there will be some contractual situations where disputes arise due to some perceived or real default on the part of one of the parties. When there is no clear path to a resolution through negotiation because the disagreement is sufficiently intractable, one recourse is to arbitration. In most contracts the potential for such a deadlock is recognized by a clause which is inserted to specify both the authority which under whose jurisdiction the arbitration will be heard, the location of the hearings, in which language they will be heard and under the laws of which country. 

The phase II or formal OOS investigation should take a multidisciplinary approach and include such functional areas as quality, production, research and development, regulatory affairs, compliance, engineering, quality control, and/or any other party that can constructively assist in rapid resolution of the failure. ... 

Thus, in respect to the five stereogenic centers, our analysis showed the Newton-Roberts approach to give the most rigorous control of the stereochemistry hence it is this route that we chose, initially for exploration and subsequently for development and manufacture. This route was also well-aligned with the available technology base developed within Chirotech. We were confident that we would be able to develop an enzymatic resolution approach for the co-chain, scale up the classical resolution approach to the bicyclo[3.2.0]hept-2-en-6-one synthon, and finally develop the cuprate addition for large-scale operation. Moreover, we were comfortable that the route could be developed without any issue of third-party intellectual property. 

On occasion a discussion will require an objective and impartial mediator, who would not favor either party but propose a resolution that is based on the most prudent and practical approach. 

There may also be legal obligations associated with the review results. A properly administered process safety management program will help minimize legal exposures. All recommendations produced by the study should be circulated in draft form to all interested parties within the company. The report should be consistent with other hazard assessment reports, and there should be a follow up procedure to manage recommendations in a timely and effective manner. All steps in the process should fully document the resolution path for each recommendation. 

---