Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Partitioning general discussion

In complete analogy to the general discussion of the transition state theory, h E) already represents the restricted partition sum (2.55), if the energy is understood as an order parameter... [Pg.61]

Emulsion polymerization has proved more difficult. N " Many of the issues discussed under NMP (Section 9.3.6.6) also apply to ATRP in emulsion. The system is made more complex by both activation and deactivation steps being bimolecular. There is both an activator (Mtn) and a deactivator (ML 1) that may partition into the aqueous phase, although the deactivator is generally more water-soluble than the activator because of its higher oxidation state. Like NMP, successful emulsion ATRP requires conditions where there is no discrete monomer droplet phase and a mechanism to remove excess deactivator built up in the particle phase as a consequence of the persistent radical effect.210 214 Reverse ATRP (Section 9.4,1,2) with water soluble dialky 1 diazcncs is the preferred initiation method/87,28 ... [Pg.498]

The theory and development of a solvent-extraction scheme for polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is described. The use of y-cyclodextrin (CDx) as an aqueous phase modifier makes this scheme unique since it allows for the extraction of PAHs from ether to the aqueous phase. Generally, the extraction of PAHS into water is not feasible due to the low solubility of these compounds in aqueous media. Water-soluble cyclodextrins, which act as hosts in the formation of inclusion complexes, promote this type of extraction by partitioning PAHs into the aqueous phase through the formation of complexes. The stereoselective nature of CDx inclusion-complex formation enhances the separation of different sized PAH molecules present in a mixture. For example, perylene is extracted into the aqueous phase from an organic phase anthracene-perylene mixture in the presence of CDx modifier. Extraction results for a variety of PAHs are presented, and the potential of this method for separation of more complex mixtures is discussed. [Pg.167]

Two macromolecular computational problems are considered (i) the atomistic modeling of bulk condensed polymer phases and their inherent non-vectorizability, and (ii) the determination of the partition coefficient of polymer chains between bulk solution and cylindrical pores. In connection with the atomistic modeling problem, an algorithm is introduced and discussed (Modified Superbox Algorithm) for the efficient determination of significantly interacting atom pairs in systems with spatially periodic boundaries of the shape of a general parallelepiped (triclinic systems). [Pg.162]

In mixtures containing high lipid water ratios, HC1 will appreciably partition into solutions with pH <2.5, as will KOH when pH >11.5 [162,284]. General box diagrams reflecting these caveats have been discussed [275]. [Pg.45]

Figures 7.31a-c clearly show that after some critical soy content in dodecane, Pe values decrease with increasing soy, for both sink and sinkless conditions. [This is not due to a neglect of membrane retention, as partly may be the case in Fig. 7.23 permeabilities here have been calculated with Eq. (7.21).] Section 7.6 discusses the Kubinyi bilinear model (Fig. 7.19d) in terms of a three-compartment system water, oil of moderate lipophilicity, and oil of high lipophilicity. Since lipo-some(phospholipid)-water partition coefficients (Chapter 5) are generally higher than alkane-water partition coefficients (Chapter 4) for drug-like molecules, soy lecithin may be assumed to be more lipophilic than dodecane. It appears that the increase in soy concentration in dodecane can be treated by the Kubinyi analysis. In the original analysis [23], two different lipid phases are selected at a fixed ratio (e.g., Fig. 7.20), and different molecules are picked over a range of lipophilicities. Figures 7.31a-c clearly show that after some critical soy content in dodecane, Pe values decrease with increasing soy, for both sink and sinkless conditions. [This is not due to a neglect of membrane retention, as partly may be the case in Fig. 7.23 permeabilities here have been calculated with Eq. (7.21).] Section 7.6 discusses the Kubinyi bilinear model (Fig. 7.19d) in terms of a three-compartment system water, oil of moderate lipophilicity, and oil of high lipophilicity. Since lipo-some(phospholipid)-water partition coefficients (Chapter 5) are generally higher than alkane-water partition coefficients (Chapter 4) for drug-like molecules, soy lecithin may be assumed to be more lipophilic than dodecane. It appears that the increase in soy concentration in dodecane can be treated by the Kubinyi analysis. In the original analysis [23], two different lipid phases are selected at a fixed ratio (e.g., Fig. 7.20), and different molecules are picked over a range of lipophilicities.
Two classes of mathematical models have been developed those which are specific and attempt to describe the transport and degradation of a chemical in a particular situation and those which are general or "evaluative" and attempt to generally classify the behavior of chemicals in a hypothetical environment. The type of modeling discussed here, equilibrium partitioning models, fall into the latter category. Such models attempt, with a minimum of information, to predict expected environmental distribution patterns of a compound and thereby identify which environmental compartments will be of primary concern. [Pg.106]

However, since and -5 asymptote to the same function, one might approximate (U) = S dJ) in (3.57) so that the acceptance probability is a constant.3 The procedure allows trial swaps to be accepted with 100% probability. This general parallel processing scheme, in which the macrostate range is divided into windows and configuration swaps are permitted, is not limited to density-of-states simulations or the WL algorithm in particular. Alternate partition functions can be calculated in this way, such as from previous discussions, and the parallel implementation is also feasible for the multicanonical approach [34] and transition-matrix calculations [35],... [Pg.104]

Return now to the assertions of the Introduction. The explanation of assertion (1) was pointed out previously. Assertion (2), that the PDT is a practical computational tool, was the subject of Sect. 9.2.3. See especially the discussion "the general computational tricks work for the PDT also, emphasizing the general statistical methods of stratification and importance weighting, and their correspondence to the natural theoretical analyses of the PDT partition function. [Pg.347]


See other pages where Partitioning general discussion is mentioned: [Pg.1327]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.1710]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.602]    [Pg.1704]    [Pg.1067]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.1153]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.1132]    [Pg.578]    [Pg.687]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.659]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.681]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.686]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.14]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.428 ]




SEARCH



General discussion

Partition coefficients General discussion

Partitioning generalized

© 2024 chempedia.info