Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Particular bimolecular reaction

We want to study a very important and interesting reaction model which takes place on a lattice. The particular reaction scheme reads as follows  [Pg.527]

The most prominent feature of the original ZGB-model (k = 0, D — 0) is the existence of kinetic phase transitions. Denoting the mole fraction of CO in the gas phase by Vco (and therefore Y02 = 1 — Tco) one finds a reactive interval 0.395 0.005 — y Vco V2 = 0.525 0.005 [2] in which both particle types are coexisting on the surface. For Fco V and for Fco yi the surface is completely covered by O2 or CO, respectively. The phase transitions are found to be of the second order at y and of the first order at yi. [Pg.528]

If one allows CO to diffuse (by the nearest neighbour hopping - equation (9.1.43)), which is a very common process at the normal temperatures of the CO oxidation, the value of j/2 is increased and reaches the stoichiometric value of 2/3 in the limit of an infinite diffusion rate [3]. Because of the irreversible character of the model (9.1.39) to (9.1.41) a completely covered surface (by one kind of species) means that the system can not escape from this absorbing state and therefore no further reactions can take place. In terms of the catalyzed CO oxidation, this is a state which describes a poisoned catalyst. The value of y2 = 2/3 is in agreement with experimental observations [14]. [Pg.528]

The additional aspect of CO desorption, equation (9.1.42), leads to the disappearance of the CO-poisoned state [15] because at every value of Ico adsorbed CO molecules are able to leave the surface. [Pg.528]

In this Section we want to introduce a stochastic model for the ZGB-model with diffusion in which reaction occurs between the nearest neighbours with an infinite reaction rate. This model shows many similarities to our previous model discussed above. Here we want to study only the new and different aspects. For more detail of the previous model see therefore Section 9.1.1. In addition we study the effect introduced by desorption and the segregation. [Pg.529]


These apply to a bimolecular reaction in which two reactant molecules become a single particle in the transition state. It is evident from Eqs. (6-20) and (6-21) that a change in concentration scale will result in a change in the magnitude of AG. An Arrhenius plot is, in effect, a plot of AG against 1/T. Because a change in concentration scale alters the intercept but not the slope of an Arrhenius plot, we conclude that the values of AG and A, but not of A//, depend upon the concentration scale employed for the expression of reactant concentrations. We, therefore, wish to know which concentration scale is the preferred one in the context of mechanistic interpretation, particularly of AS values. [Pg.254]

From the above discussion, it is obvious that response time of a system and its sensitivity are intrinsically linked. In fact they have a reciprocal relationship. As sensitivity increases it is possible to look at bimolecular reactions of species at lower and lower concentrations. In these circumstances the requirements on the response time for a system will get less and less. Of course, there are limits to how far this can be pushed, particularly with time resolved IR measurements in solutions, where absorption by the solvent is significant. Also, as indicated previously, coordination of a nascent photofragment by solvent molecules can occur on an exceedingly rapid timescale (15). Additionally, as the concentration of added reactant is diminished, reactions with impurities in the solvent or with small concentrations of atmospheric gases become a problem. Nevertheless, over a wide range of concentration there is a trade-off between minimum detectable signal and timescale. [Pg.287]

The exploitation of the reactivity of molecular crystals lies close to the origins of crystal engineering and is at the heart of the pioneering work of Schmidt [47a]. The idea is that of organizing molecules in the solid state using the principles of molecular recognition and self-assembly. Successful results have been obtained with bimolecular reactions, particularly [2+2] photoreactivity and cyclisation [47b,c]. Another important area is that of host-guest chemistry. [Pg.29]

Characterization of ion structures by bimolecular reactions, in which an ion is allowed to react with a neutral gas of known structure and the ionic products are analysed by mass spectrometry, depends on isomeric species having distinctive reactivities which reflect the functional group(s) that are present. This method is conceptually analogous to the use of structure-specific test reagents in classical solution chemistry. Sometimes a group may be transferred to a particular ion from the gas (methylene transfer is commonly encountered) on other occasions, hydrogen transfer is monitored. The latter is conveniently combined with isotopic labelling. [Pg.210]

As mentioned earlier, practically all reactions are initiated by bimolecular collisions however, certain bimolecular reactions exhibit first-order kinetics. Whether a reaction is first- or second-order is particularly important in combustion because of the presence of large radicals that decompose into a stable species and a smaller radical (primarily the hydrogen atom). A prominent combustion example is the decay of a paraffinic radical to an olefin and an H atom. The order of such reactions, and hence the appropriate rate constant expression, can change with the pressure. Thus, the rate expression developed from one pressure and temperature range may not be applicable to another range. This question of order was first addressed by Lindemann [4], who proposed that first-order processes occur as a result of a two-step reaction sequence in which the reacting molecule is activated by collisional processes, after which the activated species decomposes to products. Similarly, the activated molecule could be deactivated by another collision before it decomposes. If A is considered the reactant molecule and M its nonreacting collision partner, the Lindemann scheme can be represented as follows ... [Pg.57]

Pulse-radiolysis experiments allow an examination of the first steps in the decay of radical-cations. Solutions of the radical-cation in the region of 10 M are generated. Bimolecular reactions between species at this level of concentration proceed relatively slowly and this simplifies interpretation of the experimental data. Particularly, electron transfer between radical-cations and radical species derived from them is not observed during the experiment. [Pg.189]

Literature on reactions involving micellar counterions is particularly rich and for good reasons. The local concentration of counterions in the micellar Stern region is extremely high compared to typical aqueous solutions. As a result, bimolecular reactions involving bases such as hydroxide and acetate or oxidants such as perchlorate can be accelerated significantly by using these as a counterion for cationic surfactants. Discussion here will be restricted to a selected number of relatively recent examples of particular interest. This should not, however, distract from the merit of many of the other publications in this field. [Pg.26]

Bimolecular reactions having more products than the single species produced from a condensation are also possible, and their rate laws are constructed and measured in a fashion analogous to Eqs. (15.12) and (15.13). Note that the special case of a bimolecular reaction involving two molecules of the same reactant has a rate law that is particularly simple to integrate and work with. [Pg.522]

In this section we shall present a few of the elementary type reactions that have been solved exactly. By elementary we mean unimolecular and bimolecular reactions, and simple extensions of them. In a more classical stochastic context, these reactions may be thought of as birth and death processes, unimolecular reactions being linear birth and death processes and bimolecular being quadratic. These reactions may be described by a finite or infinite set of states, (x), each member of which corresponds to a specified number of some given type of molecule in the system. One then describes a set of transition probabilities of going from state x to x — i, which in unimolecular reactions depend linearly upon x and in bimolecular reactions depend quadratically upon x. The simplest example is that of the unimolecular irreversible decay of A into B, which occurs particularly in radioactive decay processes. This process seems to have been first studied in a chemical context by Bartholomay.6... [Pg.157]

Within the last 15 years, the field of chemical kinetics, particularly gas phase kinetics, has undergone considerable change. One might almost be tempted to term this revolutionary. The nature of this change is that a large body of quantitative data has been accumulated about elementary unimolecular reactions and bimolecular reactions involving radicals,... [Pg.147]

Thus it is possible to study the hydrolysis reactions of esters under conditions where the substrate is completely protonated. The properties of the protonated ester, however, are more conveniently examined using more strongly acidic media, in the absence of water, where bimolecular reactions are reduced to insignificance. At sufficiently low temperatures under these conditions the rates of exchange of the added protons are slow, and the detailed structures of protonated carboxylic acids and esters can be investigated, particularly by proton nmr techniques. [Pg.59]

In particular, it is useful to define the critical point through F(nc) = 0 (the stationary state). Since multicomponent chemical systems often reveal quite complicated types of motion, we restrict ourselves in this preliminary treatment to the stable stationary states, which are approached by the system without oscillations in time. To illustrate this point, we mention the simplest reversible and irreversible bimolecular reactions like A+A —> B, A+B -y B, A + B —> C. The difference of densities rj t) = n(t) — nc can be used as the redefined order parameter 77 (Fig. 1.6). For the bimolecular processes the... [Pg.10]

A new principal element of the Waite-Leibfried theory compared to the Smoluchowski approach is the relation between the effective reaction rate K(t) and the intermediate order parameter x = Xab (r,i). In its turn, the Smoluchowski approach is just an heuristic attempt to describe the simplest irreversible bimolecular reactions A + B- B,A + B- B and A + B -> 0 and cannot be extended for more complicated reactions. The Waite-Leibfried approach is not limited by these simple reactions only it could be applied to the reversible reactions and reaction chains. However, in the latter case the particular linearity in the joint correlation function x = Xab (r, ) does not always mean linearity of equations since additional non-linearity caused by particle densities can arise. [Pg.44]

Chapter 5 deals with derivation of the basic equations of the fluctuation-controlled kinetics, applied mainly to the particular bimolecular A + B 0 reaction. The transition to the simplified treatment of the density fluctuation spectrum is achieved by means of the Kirkwood superposition approximation. Its accuracy is estimated by means of a comparison of analytical results for some test problems of the chemical kinetics with the relevant computer simulations. Their good agreement permits us to establish in the next Chapters the range of the applicability of the traditional Waite-Leibfried approach. [Pg.50]

Lastly, we would like to mention here results of the two kinds of large-scale computer simulations of diffusion-controlled bimolecular reactions [33, 48], In the former paper [48] reactions were simulated using random walks on a d-dimensional (1 to 4) hypercubic lattice with the imposed periodic boundary conditions. In the particular case of the A + B - 0 reaction, D = Dq and nA(0) = nB(0), the critical exponents 0.26 0.01 0.50 0.02 and 0.89 0.02 were obtained for d = 1 to 3 respectively. The theoretical value of a = 0.75 expected for d = 3 was not achieved due to cluster size effects. The result for d = 4, a = 1.02 0.02, confirms that this is a marginal dimension. However, in the case of the A + B — B reaction with DB = 0, the asymptotic longtime behaviour, equation (2.1.106), was not achieved at all - even at very long reaction times of 105 Monte Carlo steps, which were sufficient for all other kinds of bimolecular reactions simulated. It was concluded that in practice this theoretically derived asymptotics is hardly accessible. [Pg.353]

A number of quite different techniques have been presented in the last few years for studying self-organisation phenomena in the bimolecular reactions in condensed matter. At present those are covered in the review article [49] and Proceedings of the conference [50] only we discuss their advantages and shortcomings, and the principal approximations involved (in particular, that by Kirkwood). Where possible, analytical results are compared with computer simulations, since very limited experimental data are known at present in this field. Those that do exist are also considered and the conditions for the experimental observation of cooperative effects under study are predicted theoretically. We hope that this book may stimulate new experimental studies in this very important field. [Pg.618]


See other pages where Particular bimolecular reaction is mentioned: [Pg.646]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.646]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.646]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.646]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.874]    [Pg.883]    [Pg.2116]    [Pg.2593]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.795]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.262]   


SEARCH



Particular

Particular Reactions

© 2024 chempedia.info